3R phase of MoS2 and WS2 outperforms the corresponding 2H phase for hydrogen evolution

Rou Jun Toh; Zdeněk Sofer; Jan Luxa; David Sedmidubský; Martin Pumera

doi:10.1039/c6cc09952a

3R phase of MoS₂ and WS₂ outperforms the corresponding 2H phase for hydrogen evolution

Rou Jun Toh, Zdeněk Sofer, Jan Luxa, David Sedmidubský, Martin Pumera

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Herein, we compare the bulk, 2H and 3R phases of two most prevalent TMD materials: MoS₂ and WS₂. The 3R phase outperforms its 2H phase counterpart in hydrogen evolution reaction catalysis and is even comparable with the exfoliated, 1T phase in the case of MoS₂

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	3054-3057
Number of pages	4
Journal	Chemical Communications
Volume	53
Issue number	21
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cc09952a
Publication status	Published - 2017 Jan 1

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Catalysis
Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
Ceramics and Composites
Chemistry(all)
Surfaces, Coatings and Films
Metals and Alloys
Materials Chemistry

Access to Document

10.1039/c6cc09952a

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of '3R phase of MoS<sub>2</sub> and WS<sub>2</sub> outperforms the corresponding 2H phase for hydrogen evolution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Toh, R. J., Sofer, Z., Luxa, J., Sedmidubský, D., & Pumera, M. (2017). 3R phase of MoS₂ and WS₂ outperforms the corresponding 2H phase for hydrogen evolution. Chemical Communications, 53(21), 3054-3057. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cc09952a

@article{ba04fa9bb4b7434a99d948bd2834ed53,

title = "3R phase of MoS2 and WS2 outperforms the corresponding 2H phase for hydrogen evolution",

abstract = "Herein, we compare the bulk, 2H and 3R phases of two most prevalent TMD materials: MoS2 and WS2. The 3R phase outperforms its 2H phase counterpart in hydrogen evolution reaction catalysis and is even comparable with the exfoliated, 1T phase in the case of MoS2",

author = "Toh, {Rou Jun} and Zden{\v e}k Sofer and Jan Luxa and David Sedmidubsk{\'y} and Martin Pumera",

year = "2017",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1039/c6cc09952a",

language = "English",

volume = "53",

pages = "3054--3057",

journal = "Chemical Communications",

issn = "1359-7345",

publisher = "Royal Society of Chemistry",

number = "21",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 3R phase of MoS2 and WS2 outperforms the corresponding 2H phase for hydrogen evolution

AU - Toh, Rou Jun

AU - Sofer, Zdeněk

AU - Luxa, Jan

AU - Sedmidubský, David

AU - Pumera, Martin

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Herein, we compare the bulk, 2H and 3R phases of two most prevalent TMD materials: MoS2 and WS2. The 3R phase outperforms its 2H phase counterpart in hydrogen evolution reaction catalysis and is even comparable with the exfoliated, 1T phase in the case of MoS2

AB - Herein, we compare the bulk, 2H and 3R phases of two most prevalent TMD materials: MoS2 and WS2. The 3R phase outperforms its 2H phase counterpart in hydrogen evolution reaction catalysis and is even comparable with the exfoliated, 1T phase in the case of MoS2

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015035759&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015035759&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1039/c6cc09952a

DO - 10.1039/c6cc09952a

M3 - Article

C2 - 28239725

AN - SCOPUS:85015035759

VL - 53

SP - 3054

EP - 3057

JO - Chemical Communications

JF - Chemical Communications

SN - 1359-7345

IS - 21

ER -