A comparison of nickel-titanium rotary instruments manufactured using different methods and cross-sectional areas: ability to resist cyclic fatigue

So Ram Oh, Seok Woo Chang, Yoon Lee, Yu Gu, Won Jun Son, Woocheol Lee, Seung Ho Baek, Kwang Shik Bae, Gi Woon Choi, Sang Min Lim, Kee Yeon Kum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study examined the effect of the manufacturing methods (ground, electropolished, and twisted) and the cross-sectional area (CSA) of nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary instruments on their cyclic fatigue resistance. Study design: A total of 80 NiTi rotary instruments (ISO 25/.06 taper) from 4 brands (K3, ProFile, RaCe, and TF) were rotated in a simulated root canal with pecking motion until fracture. The number of cycles to failure (NCF) was calculated. The CSA at 3 mm from the tip of new instruments of each brand was calculated. The correlation between the CSA and NCF was evaluated. All fractured surfaces were analyzed using a scanning electron microscope to determine the fracture mode. Results: The TF instruments were the most resistant to fatigue failure. The resistance to cyclic failure increased with decreasing CSA. All fractured surfaces showed the coexistence of ductile and brittle properties. Conclusion: The CSA had a significant effect on the fatigue resistance of NiTi rotary instruments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)622-628
Number of pages7
JournalOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology
Volume109
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Apr

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Supported by the 2008 SNUDH research fund (4-2008-0023).

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Oral Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Dentistry(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of nickel-titanium rotary instruments manufactured using different methods and cross-sectional areas: ability to resist cyclic fatigue'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this