A double-voiced reading of romans 13:1-7 in light of the imperial cult

Sung Uk Lim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Drawing on Mikhail Bakhtin’s theory of double-voicedness and James Scott’s theory of public and hidden transcripts, this essay investigates the colonial context of Romans 13:1-7 with particular attention to the Roman imperial cult. It is my contention that Paul attempts to persuade the audience to resist the imperial cult, whilst negotiating colonial power and authority. It is assumed that colonial discourse is, by nature, a double-voiced discourse in that the public transcript of the dominant and the hidden transcript of the suppressed coexist in a continued state of internal tension and conflict. Seen in this light, Paul as a colonised subject parodies the public transcript of the elites in his own hidden transcript. However, Paul’s doubled-voiced discourse finally turns out to be subversive against the dominant culture by suggesting that ultimate honour, fear, and authority should not be due to the rulers of the Roman Empire but to God.

Original languageEnglish
JournalHTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies
Volume71
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Authority
Imperial Cult
Discourse
Ruler
Parody
Colonial Discourse
Deity
Dominant Culture
Colonial Power
Colonies
Roman Empire
Mikhail Bakhtin
Elites

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Religious studies

Cite this

@article{59c011e56b4348809f67b0468fe13a96,
title = "A double-voiced reading of romans 13:1-7 in light of the imperial cult",
abstract = "Drawing on Mikhail Bakhtin’s theory of double-voicedness and James Scott’s theory of public and hidden transcripts, this essay investigates the colonial context of Romans 13:1-7 with particular attention to the Roman imperial cult. It is my contention that Paul attempts to persuade the audience to resist the imperial cult, whilst negotiating colonial power and authority. It is assumed that colonial discourse is, by nature, a double-voiced discourse in that the public transcript of the dominant and the hidden transcript of the suppressed coexist in a continued state of internal tension and conflict. Seen in this light, Paul as a colonised subject parodies the public transcript of the elites in his own hidden transcript. However, Paul’s doubled-voiced discourse finally turns out to be subversive against the dominant culture by suggesting that ultimate honour, fear, and authority should not be due to the rulers of the Roman Empire but to God.",
author = "Lim, {Sung Uk}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4102/hts.v71i1.2475",
language = "English",
volume = "71",
journal = "HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies",
issn = "0259-9422",
publisher = "OpenJournals Publishing AOSIS (Pty) Ltd",
number = "1",

}

A double-voiced reading of romans 13:1-7 in light of the imperial cult. / Lim, Sung Uk.

In: HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, Vol. 71, No. 1, 01.01.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A double-voiced reading of romans 13:1-7 in light of the imperial cult

AU - Lim, Sung Uk

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Drawing on Mikhail Bakhtin’s theory of double-voicedness and James Scott’s theory of public and hidden transcripts, this essay investigates the colonial context of Romans 13:1-7 with particular attention to the Roman imperial cult. It is my contention that Paul attempts to persuade the audience to resist the imperial cult, whilst negotiating colonial power and authority. It is assumed that colonial discourse is, by nature, a double-voiced discourse in that the public transcript of the dominant and the hidden transcript of the suppressed coexist in a continued state of internal tension and conflict. Seen in this light, Paul as a colonised subject parodies the public transcript of the elites in his own hidden transcript. However, Paul’s doubled-voiced discourse finally turns out to be subversive against the dominant culture by suggesting that ultimate honour, fear, and authority should not be due to the rulers of the Roman Empire but to God.

AB - Drawing on Mikhail Bakhtin’s theory of double-voicedness and James Scott’s theory of public and hidden transcripts, this essay investigates the colonial context of Romans 13:1-7 with particular attention to the Roman imperial cult. It is my contention that Paul attempts to persuade the audience to resist the imperial cult, whilst negotiating colonial power and authority. It is assumed that colonial discourse is, by nature, a double-voiced discourse in that the public transcript of the dominant and the hidden transcript of the suppressed coexist in a continued state of internal tension and conflict. Seen in this light, Paul as a colonised subject parodies the public transcript of the elites in his own hidden transcript. However, Paul’s doubled-voiced discourse finally turns out to be subversive against the dominant culture by suggesting that ultimate honour, fear, and authority should not be due to the rulers of the Roman Empire but to God.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937694030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937694030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4102/hts.v71i1.2475

DO - 10.4102/hts.v71i1.2475

M3 - Article

VL - 71

JO - HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies

JF - HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies

SN - 0259-9422

IS - 1

ER -