TY - JOUR
T1 - A multicenter, randomized, and double-blind phase IV clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combinations of amlodipine orotate/valsartan 5/160mg versus valsartan/ hydrochlorothiazide 160/12.5mg in patients with essential hypertension uncontrolled by valsartan 160mg monotherapy
AU - Ahn, Youngkeun
AU - Kim, Yongcheol
AU - Chang, Kiyuk
AU - Kim, Weon
AU - Rhee, Moo Yong
AU - Cha, Kwang Soo
AU - Hyon, Min Su
AU - Shim, Chi Young
AU - Lee, Sung Yun
AU - Kim, Doo Il
AU - Kim, Sang Wook
AU - Lim, Sang Wook
AU - Han, Kyoo Rok
AU - Jo, Sang Ho
AU - Lee, Nae Hee
AU - Kwan, Jun
AU - Ahn, Taehoon
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding/support: This research was sponsored by Dong-A ST Co Ltd, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
PY - 2018/9
Y1 - 2018/9
N2 - Background: To determine whether the effectiveness and safety of fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) of amlodipine orotate/ valsartan (AML/VAL) 5/160 mg are noninferior to those of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (VAL/HCTZ) 160/12.5 mg in hypertensive patients with inadequate response to valsartan 160 mg monotherapy. Methods: This 8-week, active-controlled, parallel-group, fixed-dose, multicenter, double-blind randomized controlled, and noninferiority trial was conducted at 17 cardiovascular centers in the Republic of Korea. Eligible patients had mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (msDBP) ≥90 mm Hg despite monotherapy with valsartan 160 mg for 4 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with AML/VAL 5/160 mg FDC (AML/VAL) group or VAL/HCTZ 160/12.5 mg FDC (VAL/HCTZ) group once daily for 8 weeks. A total of 238 patients were enrolled (AML/VAL group, n = 121; VAL/HCTZ group, n = 117), of whom 228 completed the study. Results: At 8 weeks after randomization, msDBP was significantly decreased in both groups (9.44 ± 0.69 mm Hg in the AML/VAL group and 7.47 ± 0.71 mm Hg in the VAL/HCTZ group, both P < .001 vs baseline). Between group difference was 1.96 ± 1.00 mm Hg, indicating that AML/VAL 5/160 mg FDC was not inferior to VAL/HCTZ 160/12.5 mg FDC at primary efficacy endpoint. Control rate of BP defined as the percentage of patients achieving mean sitting SBP (msSBP) <140 mm Hg or msDBP <90 mm Hg (target BP) from baseline to week 8 was significantly higher in the AML/VAL group than that in the VAL/HCTZ group (84.3% [n = 102] in the AML/VAL group vs 71.3% [n = 82] in the VAL/HCTZ group, P = .016). At 8 weeks after randomization, mean uric acid level was significantly increased in the VAL/HCTZ group compared to that at baseline (0.64 ± 0.08 mg/dL; P < .001). However, it was slightly decreased from baseline in the AML/VAL group (0.12 ± 0.08 mg/dL; P = .085). The intergroup difference was significant (P < .001). Conclusion: The effectiveness and safety AML/VAL 5/160mg FDC are noninferior to those of VAL/HCTZ 160/12.5mg FDC in patients with hypertension inadequately controlled by valsartan 160mg monotherapy.
AB - Background: To determine whether the effectiveness and safety of fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) of amlodipine orotate/ valsartan (AML/VAL) 5/160 mg are noninferior to those of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (VAL/HCTZ) 160/12.5 mg in hypertensive patients with inadequate response to valsartan 160 mg monotherapy. Methods: This 8-week, active-controlled, parallel-group, fixed-dose, multicenter, double-blind randomized controlled, and noninferiority trial was conducted at 17 cardiovascular centers in the Republic of Korea. Eligible patients had mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (msDBP) ≥90 mm Hg despite monotherapy with valsartan 160 mg for 4 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with AML/VAL 5/160 mg FDC (AML/VAL) group or VAL/HCTZ 160/12.5 mg FDC (VAL/HCTZ) group once daily for 8 weeks. A total of 238 patients were enrolled (AML/VAL group, n = 121; VAL/HCTZ group, n = 117), of whom 228 completed the study. Results: At 8 weeks after randomization, msDBP was significantly decreased in both groups (9.44 ± 0.69 mm Hg in the AML/VAL group and 7.47 ± 0.71 mm Hg in the VAL/HCTZ group, both P < .001 vs baseline). Between group difference was 1.96 ± 1.00 mm Hg, indicating that AML/VAL 5/160 mg FDC was not inferior to VAL/HCTZ 160/12.5 mg FDC at primary efficacy endpoint. Control rate of BP defined as the percentage of patients achieving mean sitting SBP (msSBP) <140 mm Hg or msDBP <90 mm Hg (target BP) from baseline to week 8 was significantly higher in the AML/VAL group than that in the VAL/HCTZ group (84.3% [n = 102] in the AML/VAL group vs 71.3% [n = 82] in the VAL/HCTZ group, P = .016). At 8 weeks after randomization, mean uric acid level was significantly increased in the VAL/HCTZ group compared to that at baseline (0.64 ± 0.08 mg/dL; P < .001). However, it was slightly decreased from baseline in the AML/VAL group (0.12 ± 0.08 mg/dL; P = .085). The intergroup difference was significant (P < .001). Conclusion: The effectiveness and safety AML/VAL 5/160mg FDC are noninferior to those of VAL/HCTZ 160/12.5mg FDC in patients with hypertension inadequately controlled by valsartan 160mg monotherapy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053726602&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053726602&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MD.0000000000012329
DO - 10.1097/MD.0000000000012329
M3 - Article
C2 - 30212981
AN - SCOPUS:85053726602
SN - 0025-7974
VL - 97
JO - Medicine (United States)
JF - Medicine (United States)
IS - 37
M1 - e12329
ER -