A multiple outcome model to assess cost-effectiveness: Results from the Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial (EAST)

Patrick D. Mauldin, William S. Weintraub, Jinook Jeong, Edmund R. Becker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper is an empirical analysis comparing coronary angioplasty (PTCA) to coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) as an initial form of therapy for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. The paper presents a model which relates multiple patient descriptors to multiple patient outcomes for 392 randomized patients to determine which procedure offers more units of quality health increase per unit increase in cost (proxy for resource utilization). The results indicate that at three year follow-up, there is no difference in cost-effectiveness between the two alternative therapies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-23
Number of pages21
JournalBiometrical Journal
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1999 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Angioplasty
Multiple Outcomes
Cost-effectiveness
Surgery
Therapy
Coronary Angioplasty
Coronary Artery Disease
Unit
Coronary Artery
Empirical Analysis
Descriptors
Health
Resources
Alternatives
Costs
Model

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty

Cite this

Mauldin, Patrick D. ; Weintraub, William S. ; Jeong, Jinook ; Becker, Edmund R. / A multiple outcome model to assess cost-effectiveness : Results from the Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial (EAST). In: Biometrical Journal. 1999 ; Vol. 41, No. 1. pp. 3-23.
@article{26e169285bc4494e90739853077ca62c,
title = "A multiple outcome model to assess cost-effectiveness: Results from the Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial (EAST)",
abstract = "This paper is an empirical analysis comparing coronary angioplasty (PTCA) to coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) as an initial form of therapy for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. The paper presents a model which relates multiple patient descriptors to multiple patient outcomes for 392 randomized patients to determine which procedure offers more units of quality health increase per unit increase in cost (proxy for resource utilization). The results indicate that at three year follow-up, there is no difference in cost-effectiveness between the two alternative therapies.",
author = "Mauldin, {Patrick D.} and Weintraub, {William S.} and Jinook Jeong and Becker, {Edmund R.}",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/(SICI)1521-4036(199903)41:1<3::AID-BIMJ3>3.0.CO;2-S",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "3--23",
journal = "Biometrical Journal",
issn = "0323-3847",
publisher = "Wiley-VCH Verlag",
number = "1",

}

A multiple outcome model to assess cost-effectiveness : Results from the Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial (EAST). / Mauldin, Patrick D.; Weintraub, William S.; Jeong, Jinook; Becker, Edmund R.

In: Biometrical Journal, Vol. 41, No. 1, 01.01.1999, p. 3-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A multiple outcome model to assess cost-effectiveness

T2 - Results from the Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial (EAST)

AU - Mauldin, Patrick D.

AU - Weintraub, William S.

AU - Jeong, Jinook

AU - Becker, Edmund R.

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

N2 - This paper is an empirical analysis comparing coronary angioplasty (PTCA) to coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) as an initial form of therapy for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. The paper presents a model which relates multiple patient descriptors to multiple patient outcomes for 392 randomized patients to determine which procedure offers more units of quality health increase per unit increase in cost (proxy for resource utilization). The results indicate that at three year follow-up, there is no difference in cost-effectiveness between the two alternative therapies.

AB - This paper is an empirical analysis comparing coronary angioplasty (PTCA) to coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) as an initial form of therapy for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. The paper presents a model which relates multiple patient descriptors to multiple patient outcomes for 392 randomized patients to determine which procedure offers more units of quality health increase per unit increase in cost (proxy for resource utilization). The results indicate that at three year follow-up, there is no difference in cost-effectiveness between the two alternative therapies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033476545&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033476545&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4036(199903)41:1<3::AID-BIMJ3>3.0.CO;2-S

DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4036(199903)41:1<3::AID-BIMJ3>3.0.CO;2-S

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033476545

VL - 41

SP - 3

EP - 23

JO - Biometrical Journal

JF - Biometrical Journal

SN - 0323-3847

IS - 1

ER -