A panel data analysis of the impacts of institutional differences on local governments' budgetary decisions

Soojin Kim, Tae Ho Eom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study provides empirical evidence on how institutional differences influence school budget decisions by using panel data from 178 K-12 New Jersey school districts for the period 1996 to 2007. The findings obtained by the Newey-West model, correcting heteroskedasticity and serial correlation, support our hypothesis that school districts with elected school boards (Type II districts) are more likely to be effective at lowering school spending than ones with appointed school boards (Type I districts). Viewing school systems through the lens of new institutional economics, this study argues that institutional differences in governance are critical in leading to differences in budgetary decisions by affecting incentive structures faced by public officials, along with transaction costs and agency costs. Points for practitioners: To date, the issue of the impact of institutional differences on local budgetary decisions has been an ongoing topic of debate among many scholars and practitioners in the public administration field. This implies that as an effective incentive structure as well as constraint mechanism, direct electoral institutions in school districts can be a valuable tool to control growing education spending by placing clear accountability on school boards in shaping school budget decisions. Policy makers should consider feasible strategies accompanied by institutional changes in a situation in which local governments are challenged to manage their budget effectively under fiscal stress.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)559-579
Number of pages21
JournalInternational Review of Administrative Sciences
Volume82
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Sep 1

Fingerprint

data analysis
school
district
budget
incentive
institutional economics
transaction costs
institutional change
school system
public administration
governance
responsibility
costs
evidence
education

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration

Cite this

@article{8630200465f34ddb9615c66c7c5e5e46,
title = "A panel data analysis of the impacts of institutional differences on local governments' budgetary decisions",
abstract = "This study provides empirical evidence on how institutional differences influence school budget decisions by using panel data from 178 K-12 New Jersey school districts for the period 1996 to 2007. The findings obtained by the Newey-West model, correcting heteroskedasticity and serial correlation, support our hypothesis that school districts with elected school boards (Type II districts) are more likely to be effective at lowering school spending than ones with appointed school boards (Type I districts). Viewing school systems through the lens of new institutional economics, this study argues that institutional differences in governance are critical in leading to differences in budgetary decisions by affecting incentive structures faced by public officials, along with transaction costs and agency costs. Points for practitioners: To date, the issue of the impact of institutional differences on local budgetary decisions has been an ongoing topic of debate among many scholars and practitioners in the public administration field. This implies that as an effective incentive structure as well as constraint mechanism, direct electoral institutions in school districts can be a valuable tool to control growing education spending by placing clear accountability on school boards in shaping school budget decisions. Policy makers should consider feasible strategies accompanied by institutional changes in a situation in which local governments are challenged to manage their budget effectively under fiscal stress.",
author = "Soojin Kim and Eom, {Tae Ho}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0020852314564306",
language = "English",
volume = "82",
pages = "559--579",
journal = "International Review of Administrative Sciences",
issn = "0020-8523",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

A panel data analysis of the impacts of institutional differences on local governments' budgetary decisions. / Kim, Soojin; Eom, Tae Ho.

In: International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 82, No. 3, 01.09.2016, p. 559-579.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A panel data analysis of the impacts of institutional differences on local governments' budgetary decisions

AU - Kim, Soojin

AU - Eom, Tae Ho

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - This study provides empirical evidence on how institutional differences influence school budget decisions by using panel data from 178 K-12 New Jersey school districts for the period 1996 to 2007. The findings obtained by the Newey-West model, correcting heteroskedasticity and serial correlation, support our hypothesis that school districts with elected school boards (Type II districts) are more likely to be effective at lowering school spending than ones with appointed school boards (Type I districts). Viewing school systems through the lens of new institutional economics, this study argues that institutional differences in governance are critical in leading to differences in budgetary decisions by affecting incentive structures faced by public officials, along with transaction costs and agency costs. Points for practitioners: To date, the issue of the impact of institutional differences on local budgetary decisions has been an ongoing topic of debate among many scholars and practitioners in the public administration field. This implies that as an effective incentive structure as well as constraint mechanism, direct electoral institutions in school districts can be a valuable tool to control growing education spending by placing clear accountability on school boards in shaping school budget decisions. Policy makers should consider feasible strategies accompanied by institutional changes in a situation in which local governments are challenged to manage their budget effectively under fiscal stress.

AB - This study provides empirical evidence on how institutional differences influence school budget decisions by using panel data from 178 K-12 New Jersey school districts for the period 1996 to 2007. The findings obtained by the Newey-West model, correcting heteroskedasticity and serial correlation, support our hypothesis that school districts with elected school boards (Type II districts) are more likely to be effective at lowering school spending than ones with appointed school boards (Type I districts). Viewing school systems through the lens of new institutional economics, this study argues that institutional differences in governance are critical in leading to differences in budgetary decisions by affecting incentive structures faced by public officials, along with transaction costs and agency costs. Points for practitioners: To date, the issue of the impact of institutional differences on local budgetary decisions has been an ongoing topic of debate among many scholars and practitioners in the public administration field. This implies that as an effective incentive structure as well as constraint mechanism, direct electoral institutions in school districts can be a valuable tool to control growing education spending by placing clear accountability on school boards in shaping school budget decisions. Policy makers should consider feasible strategies accompanied by institutional changes in a situation in which local governments are challenged to manage their budget effectively under fiscal stress.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983734662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983734662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0020852314564306

DO - 10.1177/0020852314564306

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84983734662

VL - 82

SP - 559

EP - 579

JO - International Review of Administrative Sciences

JF - International Review of Administrative Sciences

SN - 0020-8523

IS - 3

ER -