A Pluralist Reconstruction of Confucian Democracy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, I attempt to revamp Confucian democracy, which is originally presented as the communitarian corrective and cultural alternative to Western liberal democracy, into a robust democratic political theory and practice that is plausible in the societal context of pluralism. In order to do so, I first investigate the core tenets of value pluralism with reference to William Galston's political theory, which gives full attention to the intrinsic value of diversity and human plurality particularly in the modern democratic context. I then construct a political theory of Confucian pluralist democracy by critically engaging with two dominant versions of Confucian democracy-Confucian communitarian democracy and Confucian meritocratic democracy. My key argument is threefold: (1) the unity in Confucian democracy should be interpreted not as moral unity but as constitutional unity; (2) Confucian virtues should be differentiated (or pluralized) between moral virtues and civic virtues; (3) in Confucian democracy minorities have the constitutional right to contest public norms in civil society.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)315-336
Number of pages22
JournalDao
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Jul 16

Fingerprint

Confucian
Democracy
Pluralist
Unity
Political Theory
Communitarian
Revamp
Value Pluralism
Moral Virtue
Civil Society
Liberal Democracy
Pluralism
Civic Virtue
Minorities
Plurality
Intrinsic Value
Tenets
Contests

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy

Cite this

Kim, Sungmoon. / A Pluralist Reconstruction of Confucian Democracy. In: Dao. 2012 ; Vol. 11, No. 3. pp. 315-336.
@article{18ccb0fdc58e4b36b85710894b44a3ac,
title = "A Pluralist Reconstruction of Confucian Democracy",
abstract = "In this paper, I attempt to revamp Confucian democracy, which is originally presented as the communitarian corrective and cultural alternative to Western liberal democracy, into a robust democratic political theory and practice that is plausible in the societal context of pluralism. In order to do so, I first investigate the core tenets of value pluralism with reference to William Galston's political theory, which gives full attention to the intrinsic value of diversity and human plurality particularly in the modern democratic context. I then construct a political theory of Confucian pluralist democracy by critically engaging with two dominant versions of Confucian democracy-Confucian communitarian democracy and Confucian meritocratic democracy. My key argument is threefold: (1) the unity in Confucian democracy should be interpreted not as moral unity but as constitutional unity; (2) Confucian virtues should be differentiated (or pluralized) between moral virtues and civic virtues; (3) in Confucian democracy minorities have the constitutional right to contest public norms in civil society.",
author = "Sungmoon Kim",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1007/s11712-012-9289-7",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "315--336",
journal = "Dao",
issn = "1540-3009",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

A Pluralist Reconstruction of Confucian Democracy. / Kim, Sungmoon.

In: Dao, Vol. 11, No. 3, 16.07.2012, p. 315-336.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Pluralist Reconstruction of Confucian Democracy

AU - Kim, Sungmoon

PY - 2012/7/16

Y1 - 2012/7/16

N2 - In this paper, I attempt to revamp Confucian democracy, which is originally presented as the communitarian corrective and cultural alternative to Western liberal democracy, into a robust democratic political theory and practice that is plausible in the societal context of pluralism. In order to do so, I first investigate the core tenets of value pluralism with reference to William Galston's political theory, which gives full attention to the intrinsic value of diversity and human plurality particularly in the modern democratic context. I then construct a political theory of Confucian pluralist democracy by critically engaging with two dominant versions of Confucian democracy-Confucian communitarian democracy and Confucian meritocratic democracy. My key argument is threefold: (1) the unity in Confucian democracy should be interpreted not as moral unity but as constitutional unity; (2) Confucian virtues should be differentiated (or pluralized) between moral virtues and civic virtues; (3) in Confucian democracy minorities have the constitutional right to contest public norms in civil society.

AB - In this paper, I attempt to revamp Confucian democracy, which is originally presented as the communitarian corrective and cultural alternative to Western liberal democracy, into a robust democratic political theory and practice that is plausible in the societal context of pluralism. In order to do so, I first investigate the core tenets of value pluralism with reference to William Galston's political theory, which gives full attention to the intrinsic value of diversity and human plurality particularly in the modern democratic context. I then construct a political theory of Confucian pluralist democracy by critically engaging with two dominant versions of Confucian democracy-Confucian communitarian democracy and Confucian meritocratic democracy. My key argument is threefold: (1) the unity in Confucian democracy should be interpreted not as moral unity but as constitutional unity; (2) Confucian virtues should be differentiated (or pluralized) between moral virtues and civic virtues; (3) in Confucian democracy minorities have the constitutional right to contest public norms in civil society.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867092531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867092531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11712-012-9289-7

DO - 10.1007/s11712-012-9289-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84867092531

VL - 11

SP - 315

EP - 336

JO - Dao

JF - Dao

SN - 1540-3009

IS - 3

ER -