A randomized Phase 2 study to compare erlotinib with or without bevacizumab in previously untreated patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation

Youngjoo Lee, Hye Ryun Kim, Min Hee Hong, Ki Hyeong Lee, Keon Uk Park, Geon Kook Lee, Hyae Young Kim, Soo Hyun Lee, Kun Young Lim, Sung Jin Yoon, Byoung Chul Cho, Ji Youn Han

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: This study evaluated whether an addition of bevacizumab to erlotinib improves clinical outcomes in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: This is an open-label, multicenter, randomized Phase 2 study in South Korea. Chemonaïve patients with Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC with EGFR 19 deletion or L858R mutation were eligible. Asymptomatic brain metastasis (BM) was enrolled without local treatment. Patients received either erlotinib plus bevacizumab or erlotinib. Results: Between December 2016 and March 2019, 127 patients were randomly assigned to receive erlotinib plus bevacizumab (n = 64) or erlotinib (n = 63). Fifty-nine (46.5%) patients had baseline BM. Fewer patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab arm received radiotherapy for BM than in the erlotinib arm (10.3% vs. 40.0%). A trend toward longer progression-free survival (PFS) was observed in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab arm compared with the erlotinib alone arm; however, it was not statistically significant (median PFS, 17.5 months vs. 12.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.51–1.08; p =.119). The unplanned subgroup analysis showed a longer PFS with erlotinib plus bevacizumab in patients with BM (median PFS, 18.6 months vs. 10.3 months; HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31–0.95; p =.032). Grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 56.6% of the erlotinib plus bevacizumab arm and 20.6% of the erlotinib arm. Conclusions: Although it was not statistically significant, a trend to improvement in PFS was observed in patients with erlotinib plus bevacizumab compared to erlotinib alone. Plain Language Summary: A randomized Phase 2 study compared erlotinib with or without bevacizumab in previously untreated patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation. The erlotinib plus bevacizumab failed to improve median progression-free survival compared with the erlotinib alone. However, the progression-free survival benefit from erlotinib plus bevacizumab was found in patients with brain metastasis with no severe hemorrhagic adverse effects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)405-414
Number of pages10
JournalCancer
Volume129
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023 Feb 1

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We thank the patients and their families who participated in the study. The study was supported partly by a National Cancer Center Research Grant (2210551‐1) and Roche Korea Inc.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A randomized Phase 2 study to compare erlotinib with or without bevacizumab in previously untreated patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this