A retrospective case series evaluating the outcome of implants with low primary stability

Kwan Joo Lee, Jae Kook Cha, Ignacio Sanz-Martin, Mariano Sanz, Ui-Won Jung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: There is a need of more studies on whether low primary implant stability would negatively influence the success of implant therapy. Therefore, this retrospective study analyses outcomes of implants placed with low primary stability and factors that may be related to implant failures. Material and methods: This retrospective study included 156 patients, restored with 169 implants that presented manual rotation within an observed follow-up time of a minimum of 34 days and a maximum of 9.28 years. Descriptive statistics, survival analyses (life tables and Kaplan–Meier estimates) and radiographic assessment based on marginal bone level measurements were performed. This original study was adherent to STROBE guidelines. Results: Seven implants failed in seven patients, rendering cumulative survival rates of 94.74% (95% CI: 89.11–97.50) and 94.33% (95% CI: 88.30–97.30) at implant and patient levels, respectively. Kaplan–Meier estimates showed implant loss was found only in advanced surgery group (7 implant loss in 82 implants) when compared with simple surgery group (no implant loss in 87 implants; p = 0.005). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this retrospective study, implant placement with low primary stability might not negatively affect either the survival rates or marginal bone level changes of implants provided that a protected and unloaded healing is guaranteed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)861-871
Number of pages11
JournalClinical Oral Implants Research
Volume30
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Sep 1

Fingerprint

Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
Bone and Bones
Life Tables
Survival Analysis
Guidelines
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

Lee, Kwan Joo ; Cha, Jae Kook ; Sanz-Martin, Ignacio ; Sanz, Mariano ; Jung, Ui-Won. / A retrospective case series evaluating the outcome of implants with low primary stability. In: Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2019 ; Vol. 30, No. 9. pp. 861-871.
@article{80d3977c4da743318d9acbe4c7f266d3,
title = "A retrospective case series evaluating the outcome of implants with low primary stability",
abstract = "Objectives: There is a need of more studies on whether low primary implant stability would negatively influence the success of implant therapy. Therefore, this retrospective study analyses outcomes of implants placed with low primary stability and factors that may be related to implant failures. Material and methods: This retrospective study included 156 patients, restored with 169 implants that presented manual rotation within an observed follow-up time of a minimum of 34 days and a maximum of 9.28 years. Descriptive statistics, survival analyses (life tables and Kaplan–Meier estimates) and radiographic assessment based on marginal bone level measurements were performed. This original study was adherent to STROBE guidelines. Results: Seven implants failed in seven patients, rendering cumulative survival rates of 94.74{\%} (95{\%} CI: 89.11–97.50) and 94.33{\%} (95{\%} CI: 88.30–97.30) at implant and patient levels, respectively. Kaplan–Meier estimates showed implant loss was found only in advanced surgery group (7 implant loss in 82 implants) when compared with simple surgery group (no implant loss in 87 implants; p = 0.005). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this retrospective study, implant placement with low primary stability might not negatively affect either the survival rates or marginal bone level changes of implants provided that a protected and unloaded healing is guaranteed.",
author = "Lee, {Kwan Joo} and Cha, {Jae Kook} and Ignacio Sanz-Martin and Mariano Sanz and Ui-Won Jung",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/clr.13491",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "861--871",
journal = "Clinical Oral Implants Research",
issn = "0905-7161",
publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",
number = "9",

}

A retrospective case series evaluating the outcome of implants with low primary stability. / Lee, Kwan Joo; Cha, Jae Kook; Sanz-Martin, Ignacio; Sanz, Mariano; Jung, Ui-Won.

In: Clinical Oral Implants Research, Vol. 30, No. 9, 01.09.2019, p. 861-871.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A retrospective case series evaluating the outcome of implants with low primary stability

AU - Lee, Kwan Joo

AU - Cha, Jae Kook

AU - Sanz-Martin, Ignacio

AU - Sanz, Mariano

AU - Jung, Ui-Won

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - Objectives: There is a need of more studies on whether low primary implant stability would negatively influence the success of implant therapy. Therefore, this retrospective study analyses outcomes of implants placed with low primary stability and factors that may be related to implant failures. Material and methods: This retrospective study included 156 patients, restored with 169 implants that presented manual rotation within an observed follow-up time of a minimum of 34 days and a maximum of 9.28 years. Descriptive statistics, survival analyses (life tables and Kaplan–Meier estimates) and radiographic assessment based on marginal bone level measurements were performed. This original study was adherent to STROBE guidelines. Results: Seven implants failed in seven patients, rendering cumulative survival rates of 94.74% (95% CI: 89.11–97.50) and 94.33% (95% CI: 88.30–97.30) at implant and patient levels, respectively. Kaplan–Meier estimates showed implant loss was found only in advanced surgery group (7 implant loss in 82 implants) when compared with simple surgery group (no implant loss in 87 implants; p = 0.005). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this retrospective study, implant placement with low primary stability might not negatively affect either the survival rates or marginal bone level changes of implants provided that a protected and unloaded healing is guaranteed.

AB - Objectives: There is a need of more studies on whether low primary implant stability would negatively influence the success of implant therapy. Therefore, this retrospective study analyses outcomes of implants placed with low primary stability and factors that may be related to implant failures. Material and methods: This retrospective study included 156 patients, restored with 169 implants that presented manual rotation within an observed follow-up time of a minimum of 34 days and a maximum of 9.28 years. Descriptive statistics, survival analyses (life tables and Kaplan–Meier estimates) and radiographic assessment based on marginal bone level measurements were performed. This original study was adherent to STROBE guidelines. Results: Seven implants failed in seven patients, rendering cumulative survival rates of 94.74% (95% CI: 89.11–97.50) and 94.33% (95% CI: 88.30–97.30) at implant and patient levels, respectively. Kaplan–Meier estimates showed implant loss was found only in advanced surgery group (7 implant loss in 82 implants) when compared with simple surgery group (no implant loss in 87 implants; p = 0.005). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this retrospective study, implant placement with low primary stability might not negatively affect either the survival rates or marginal bone level changes of implants provided that a protected and unloaded healing is guaranteed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068070887&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068070887&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/clr.13491

DO - 10.1111/clr.13491

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 861

EP - 871

JO - Clinical Oral Implants Research

JF - Clinical Oral Implants Research

SN - 0905-7161

IS - 9

ER -