A scalable and adaptive method for finding semantically equivalent cue words of uncertainty

Chaomei Chen, Min Song, Go Eun Heo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Scientific knowledge is constantly subject to a variety of changes due to new discoveries, alternative interpretations, and fresh perspectives. Understanding uncertainties associated with various stages of scientific inquiries is an integral part of scientists’ domain expertise and it serves as the core of their meta-knowledge of science. Despite the growing interest in areas such as computational linguistics, systematically characterizing and tracking the epistemic status of scientific claims and their evolution in scientific disciplines remains a challenge. We present a unifying framework for the study of uncertainties explicitly and implicitly conveyed in scientific publications. The framework aims to accommodate a wide range of uncertainty types, from speculations to inconsistencies and controversies. We introduce a scalable and adaptive method to recognize semantically equivalent cues of uncertainty across different fields of research and accommodate individual analysts’ unique perspectives. We demonstrate how the new method can be used to expand a small seed list of uncertainty cue words and how the validity of the expanded candidate cue words is verified. We visualize the mixture of the original and expanded uncertainty cue words to reveal the diversity of expressions of uncertainty. These cue words offer a novel resource for the study of uncertainty in scientific assertions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)158-180
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Informetrics
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Feb 1

Fingerprint

uncertainty
Computational linguistics
computational linguistics
scientific discipline
Uncertainty
speculation
Seed
expertise
candidacy
interpretation
science
resources
knowledge

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

@article{7093aaeb836c4068b4858d37b2a5b664,
title = "A scalable and adaptive method for finding semantically equivalent cue words of uncertainty",
abstract = "Scientific knowledge is constantly subject to a variety of changes due to new discoveries, alternative interpretations, and fresh perspectives. Understanding uncertainties associated with various stages of scientific inquiries is an integral part of scientists’ domain expertise and it serves as the core of their meta-knowledge of science. Despite the growing interest in areas such as computational linguistics, systematically characterizing and tracking the epistemic status of scientific claims and their evolution in scientific disciplines remains a challenge. We present a unifying framework for the study of uncertainties explicitly and implicitly conveyed in scientific publications. The framework aims to accommodate a wide range of uncertainty types, from speculations to inconsistencies and controversies. We introduce a scalable and adaptive method to recognize semantically equivalent cues of uncertainty across different fields of research and accommodate individual analysts’ unique perspectives. We demonstrate how the new method can be used to expand a small seed list of uncertainty cue words and how the validity of the expanded candidate cue words is verified. We visualize the mixture of the original and expanded uncertainty cue words to reveal the diversity of expressions of uncertainty. These cue words offer a novel resource for the study of uncertainty in scientific assertions.",
author = "Chaomei Chen and Min Song and Heo, {Go Eun}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.joi.2017.12.004",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "158--180",
journal = "Journal of Informetrics",
issn = "1751-1577",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

A scalable and adaptive method for finding semantically equivalent cue words of uncertainty. / Chen, Chaomei; Song, Min; Heo, Go Eun.

In: Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.02.2018, p. 158-180.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A scalable and adaptive method for finding semantically equivalent cue words of uncertainty

AU - Chen, Chaomei

AU - Song, Min

AU - Heo, Go Eun

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Scientific knowledge is constantly subject to a variety of changes due to new discoveries, alternative interpretations, and fresh perspectives. Understanding uncertainties associated with various stages of scientific inquiries is an integral part of scientists’ domain expertise and it serves as the core of their meta-knowledge of science. Despite the growing interest in areas such as computational linguistics, systematically characterizing and tracking the epistemic status of scientific claims and their evolution in scientific disciplines remains a challenge. We present a unifying framework for the study of uncertainties explicitly and implicitly conveyed in scientific publications. The framework aims to accommodate a wide range of uncertainty types, from speculations to inconsistencies and controversies. We introduce a scalable and adaptive method to recognize semantically equivalent cues of uncertainty across different fields of research and accommodate individual analysts’ unique perspectives. We demonstrate how the new method can be used to expand a small seed list of uncertainty cue words and how the validity of the expanded candidate cue words is verified. We visualize the mixture of the original and expanded uncertainty cue words to reveal the diversity of expressions of uncertainty. These cue words offer a novel resource for the study of uncertainty in scientific assertions.

AB - Scientific knowledge is constantly subject to a variety of changes due to new discoveries, alternative interpretations, and fresh perspectives. Understanding uncertainties associated with various stages of scientific inquiries is an integral part of scientists’ domain expertise and it serves as the core of their meta-knowledge of science. Despite the growing interest in areas such as computational linguistics, systematically characterizing and tracking the epistemic status of scientific claims and their evolution in scientific disciplines remains a challenge. We present a unifying framework for the study of uncertainties explicitly and implicitly conveyed in scientific publications. The framework aims to accommodate a wide range of uncertainty types, from speculations to inconsistencies and controversies. We introduce a scalable and adaptive method to recognize semantically equivalent cues of uncertainty across different fields of research and accommodate individual analysts’ unique perspectives. We demonstrate how the new method can be used to expand a small seed list of uncertainty cue words and how the validity of the expanded candidate cue words is verified. We visualize the mixture of the original and expanded uncertainty cue words to reveal the diversity of expressions of uncertainty. These cue words offer a novel resource for the study of uncertainty in scientific assertions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039869492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85039869492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.joi.2017.12.004

DO - 10.1016/j.joi.2017.12.004

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 158

EP - 180

JO - Journal of Informetrics

JF - Journal of Informetrics

SN - 1751-1577

IS - 1

ER -