A sexual health care attitude scale for nurses: Development and psychometric evaluation

Sue Kim, Hee Sun Kang, Jung Hee Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Oncology nurses should possess a high level of sensitivity while dealing with patients' sexual health needs. However, sexual health care is still inadequately addressed because of barriers such as conservative beliefs and incorrect assumptions regarding sexual issues. Most scales for measuring attitude toward sexual health care were insufficient to establish the instrument's validity and did not focus on oncology nurses. Aims and objective: The purpose of this study was to develop a scale considering cultural contexts to investigate nurses' attitude toward sexual health care in patients suffering from cancer. Design: This study was designed for scale development. Methods: A preliminary version of the instrument was developed through a literature review and interviews with 10 oncology nurses; this version consisted of 42 items rated on a 3-point scale. Eight experts reviewed the questionnaire for content validity and consolidated 36 items. Data were collected from 342 oncology nurses in Korea. Exploratory factor analysis was performed, and reliability was assessed using Cronbach α values. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to test the concurrent validity. Results: Exploratory factor analysis revealed 17 items (4 factors), which account for 70.49% of the total variance. The 4 factors were (1) discomfort in providing sexual health care (7 items), (2) feeling uncertain about patient's acceptance (4 items), (3) afraid of colleagues' negative response (3 items), and (4) lack of environmental support (3 items). Correlation of the sub-factors ranged from 0.35 to 0.63. The Cronbach α value was 0.92. Significant negative correlations were found between the attitude toward sexual health care and the Sexuality Attitudes and Belief Survey (r= -0.57, p< 0.001). Conclusion: The scale of attitude toward sexual health care showed validity and reliability in evaluating the attitude of oncology nurses toward sexual health care and can be used to identify attitudinal barriers in nurses as well as to develop and test educational interventions for the improvement of sexual health care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1522-1532
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Nursing Studies
Volume48
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Attitude to Health
Reproductive Health
Psychometrics
Nurses
Delivery of Health Care
Statistical Factor Analysis
Sexuality
Korea
Reproducibility of Results
Emotions
Interviews

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

@article{1d6184a8348b4c648c7914723a82430f,
title = "A sexual health care attitude scale for nurses: Development and psychometric evaluation",
abstract = "Background: Oncology nurses should possess a high level of sensitivity while dealing with patients' sexual health needs. However, sexual health care is still inadequately addressed because of barriers such as conservative beliefs and incorrect assumptions regarding sexual issues. Most scales for measuring attitude toward sexual health care were insufficient to establish the instrument's validity and did not focus on oncology nurses. Aims and objective: The purpose of this study was to develop a scale considering cultural contexts to investigate nurses' attitude toward sexual health care in patients suffering from cancer. Design: This study was designed for scale development. Methods: A preliminary version of the instrument was developed through a literature review and interviews with 10 oncology nurses; this version consisted of 42 items rated on a 3-point scale. Eight experts reviewed the questionnaire for content validity and consolidated 36 items. Data were collected from 342 oncology nurses in Korea. Exploratory factor analysis was performed, and reliability was assessed using Cronbach α values. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to test the concurrent validity. Results: Exploratory factor analysis revealed 17 items (4 factors), which account for 70.49{\%} of the total variance. The 4 factors were (1) discomfort in providing sexual health care (7 items), (2) feeling uncertain about patient's acceptance (4 items), (3) afraid of colleagues' negative response (3 items), and (4) lack of environmental support (3 items). Correlation of the sub-factors ranged from 0.35 to 0.63. The Cronbach α value was 0.92. Significant negative correlations were found between the attitude toward sexual health care and the Sexuality Attitudes and Belief Survey (r= -0.57, p< 0.001). Conclusion: The scale of attitude toward sexual health care showed validity and reliability in evaluating the attitude of oncology nurses toward sexual health care and can be used to identify attitudinal barriers in nurses as well as to develop and test educational interventions for the improvement of sexual health care.",
author = "Sue Kim and Kang, {Hee Sun} and Kim, {Jung Hee}",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.06.008",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "1522--1532",
journal = "International Journal of Nursing Studies",
issn = "0020-7489",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "12",

}

A sexual health care attitude scale for nurses : Development and psychometric evaluation. / Kim, Sue; Kang, Hee Sun; Kim, Jung Hee.

In: International Journal of Nursing Studies, Vol. 48, No. 12, 01.12.2011, p. 1522-1532.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A sexual health care attitude scale for nurses

T2 - Development and psychometric evaluation

AU - Kim, Sue

AU - Kang, Hee Sun

AU - Kim, Jung Hee

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - Background: Oncology nurses should possess a high level of sensitivity while dealing with patients' sexual health needs. However, sexual health care is still inadequately addressed because of barriers such as conservative beliefs and incorrect assumptions regarding sexual issues. Most scales for measuring attitude toward sexual health care were insufficient to establish the instrument's validity and did not focus on oncology nurses. Aims and objective: The purpose of this study was to develop a scale considering cultural contexts to investigate nurses' attitude toward sexual health care in patients suffering from cancer. Design: This study was designed for scale development. Methods: A preliminary version of the instrument was developed through a literature review and interviews with 10 oncology nurses; this version consisted of 42 items rated on a 3-point scale. Eight experts reviewed the questionnaire for content validity and consolidated 36 items. Data were collected from 342 oncology nurses in Korea. Exploratory factor analysis was performed, and reliability was assessed using Cronbach α values. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to test the concurrent validity. Results: Exploratory factor analysis revealed 17 items (4 factors), which account for 70.49% of the total variance. The 4 factors were (1) discomfort in providing sexual health care (7 items), (2) feeling uncertain about patient's acceptance (4 items), (3) afraid of colleagues' negative response (3 items), and (4) lack of environmental support (3 items). Correlation of the sub-factors ranged from 0.35 to 0.63. The Cronbach α value was 0.92. Significant negative correlations were found between the attitude toward sexual health care and the Sexuality Attitudes and Belief Survey (r= -0.57, p< 0.001). Conclusion: The scale of attitude toward sexual health care showed validity and reliability in evaluating the attitude of oncology nurses toward sexual health care and can be used to identify attitudinal barriers in nurses as well as to develop and test educational interventions for the improvement of sexual health care.

AB - Background: Oncology nurses should possess a high level of sensitivity while dealing with patients' sexual health needs. However, sexual health care is still inadequately addressed because of barriers such as conservative beliefs and incorrect assumptions regarding sexual issues. Most scales for measuring attitude toward sexual health care were insufficient to establish the instrument's validity and did not focus on oncology nurses. Aims and objective: The purpose of this study was to develop a scale considering cultural contexts to investigate nurses' attitude toward sexual health care in patients suffering from cancer. Design: This study was designed for scale development. Methods: A preliminary version of the instrument was developed through a literature review and interviews with 10 oncology nurses; this version consisted of 42 items rated on a 3-point scale. Eight experts reviewed the questionnaire for content validity and consolidated 36 items. Data were collected from 342 oncology nurses in Korea. Exploratory factor analysis was performed, and reliability was assessed using Cronbach α values. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to test the concurrent validity. Results: Exploratory factor analysis revealed 17 items (4 factors), which account for 70.49% of the total variance. The 4 factors were (1) discomfort in providing sexual health care (7 items), (2) feeling uncertain about patient's acceptance (4 items), (3) afraid of colleagues' negative response (3 items), and (4) lack of environmental support (3 items). Correlation of the sub-factors ranged from 0.35 to 0.63. The Cronbach α value was 0.92. Significant negative correlations were found between the attitude toward sexual health care and the Sexuality Attitudes and Belief Survey (r= -0.57, p< 0.001). Conclusion: The scale of attitude toward sexual health care showed validity and reliability in evaluating the attitude of oncology nurses toward sexual health care and can be used to identify attitudinal barriers in nurses as well as to develop and test educational interventions for the improvement of sexual health care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=81855167048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=81855167048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.06.008

DO - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.06.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 21855066

AN - SCOPUS:81855167048

VL - 48

SP - 1522

EP - 1532

JO - International Journal of Nursing Studies

JF - International Journal of Nursing Studies

SN - 0020-7489

IS - 12

ER -