Abstract
An econometric model is presented to compare the cost-effectiveness of two alternative procedures, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease. This study utilizes the MIMIC (multiple indicator multiple cause) health model in a simultaneous equation system to analyse Emery Angioplasty Surgery Trial (EAST) data. This method eliminates the possibility of endogeneity bias, which may have affected the results of previous cost-effectiveness analyses on this topic. The empirical results indicate that neither procedure proves more cost-effective at 3 year follow-up.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 613-623 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Health Economics |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Publication status | Published - 1997 Nov 1 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Health Policy
Cite this
}
A study on the cost-effectiveness of coronary revascularization : Introducing the simultaneous mimic health status model. / Lee, Jae Sang; Bailey, Martin J.; Jeong, Jinook; Mauldin, Patrick D.; Weintraub, William S.
In: Health Economics, Vol. 6, No. 6, 01.11.1997, p. 613-623.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - A study on the cost-effectiveness of coronary revascularization
T2 - Introducing the simultaneous mimic health status model
AU - Lee, Jae Sang
AU - Bailey, Martin J.
AU - Jeong, Jinook
AU - Mauldin, Patrick D.
AU - Weintraub, William S.
PY - 1997/11/1
Y1 - 1997/11/1
N2 - An econometric model is presented to compare the cost-effectiveness of two alternative procedures, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease. This study utilizes the MIMIC (multiple indicator multiple cause) health model in a simultaneous equation system to analyse Emery Angioplasty Surgery Trial (EAST) data. This method eliminates the possibility of endogeneity bias, which may have affected the results of previous cost-effectiveness analyses on this topic. The empirical results indicate that neither procedure proves more cost-effective at 3 year follow-up.
AB - An econometric model is presented to compare the cost-effectiveness of two alternative procedures, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease. This study utilizes the MIMIC (multiple indicator multiple cause) health model in a simultaneous equation system to analyse Emery Angioplasty Surgery Trial (EAST) data. This method eliminates the possibility of endogeneity bias, which may have affected the results of previous cost-effectiveness analyses on this topic. The empirical results indicate that neither procedure proves more cost-effective at 3 year follow-up.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031435792&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031435792&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 9466143
AN - SCOPUS:0031435792
VL - 6
SP - 613
EP - 623
JO - Health Economics
JF - Health Economics
SN - 1057-9230
IS - 6
ER -