A validation study of the Korean version of the swallowing-quality of life scale

Ja Young Kim, Deog Yong Kim, Hyang Hee Kim, Sung-Rae Cho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Although impairment of the swallowing function is a troublesome symptom in the general population, until recently, there has been no instrument for evaluating dysphagia. The aim of this work is to study the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Swallowing-Quality of Life questionnaire (K-SWAL-QOL). Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 53 patients, who are clinically diagnosed as neurological or mechanical oropharyngeal dysphagia and have shown consistent symptoms of dysphagia during at least 6 months, was conducted. Fifty-three healthy age matched controls were recruited to evaluate the validity and reliability of K-SWAL-QOL. Among the participants of this study, 5 patients and 5 healthy controls were randomly chosen for the test-retest reliability. Results: Reliability was estimated using tests of internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The K-SWAL-QOL was able to differentiate between dysphagic and nondysphagic patients. Construct validity was validated through a factor analysis. The psychometric properties of the K-SWAL-QOL were found to be largely similar to those of the original SWAL-QOL; however, 10 factors are clustered by 7 factors (Mental Health, Social Functioning, Eating Related, General Health, Communication, Burden, and Food Selection). A correlation study of the total score between the K-SWAL-QOL and the SF-36 (The Short Form-36), which is a widely used generic questionnaire for measuring health-related QOL, showed no significant results. Conclusion: K-SWAL-QOL is found to be a clinically valid and reliable tool for assessing the quality of life among Korean individuals with dysphagia. We expect that K-SWAL-QOL will contribute to improve the quality of life for Korean patients with dysphagia in the future.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)341-347
Number of pages7
JournalCommunication Sciences and Disorders
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Validation Studies
Deglutition
quality of life
Quality of Life
Deglutition Disorders
Health
questionnaire
Reproducibility of Results
Factor analysis
Psychometrics
psychometrics
Health Communication
Food Preferences
Communication
Surveys and Questionnaires
construct validity
health
eating behavior
Statistical Factor Analysis
factor analysis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Kim, Ja Young ; Kim, Deog Yong ; Kim, Hyang Hee ; Cho, Sung-Rae. / A validation study of the Korean version of the swallowing-quality of life scale. In: Communication Sciences and Disorders. 2013 ; Vol. 18, No. 3. pp. 341-347.
@article{f901e96e8ae7421fb75c60b8070b17dc,
title = "A validation study of the Korean version of the swallowing-quality of life scale",
abstract = "Objectives: Although impairment of the swallowing function is a troublesome symptom in the general population, until recently, there has been no instrument for evaluating dysphagia. The aim of this work is to study the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Swallowing-Quality of Life questionnaire (K-SWAL-QOL). Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 53 patients, who are clinically diagnosed as neurological or mechanical oropharyngeal dysphagia and have shown consistent symptoms of dysphagia during at least 6 months, was conducted. Fifty-three healthy age matched controls were recruited to evaluate the validity and reliability of K-SWAL-QOL. Among the participants of this study, 5 patients and 5 healthy controls were randomly chosen for the test-retest reliability. Results: Reliability was estimated using tests of internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The K-SWAL-QOL was able to differentiate between dysphagic and nondysphagic patients. Construct validity was validated through a factor analysis. The psychometric properties of the K-SWAL-QOL were found to be largely similar to those of the original SWAL-QOL; however, 10 factors are clustered by 7 factors (Mental Health, Social Functioning, Eating Related, General Health, Communication, Burden, and Food Selection). A correlation study of the total score between the K-SWAL-QOL and the SF-36 (The Short Form-36), which is a widely used generic questionnaire for measuring health-related QOL, showed no significant results. Conclusion: K-SWAL-QOL is found to be a clinically valid and reliable tool for assessing the quality of life among Korean individuals with dysphagia. We expect that K-SWAL-QOL will contribute to improve the quality of life for Korean patients with dysphagia in the future.",
author = "Kim, {Ja Young} and Kim, {Deog Yong} and Kim, {Hyang Hee} and Sung-Rae Cho",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.12963/csd.13038",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "341--347",
journal = "Communication Sciences and Disorders",
issn = "2288-1328",
publisher = "The Korean Academy of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology (KASA)",
number = "3",

}

A validation study of the Korean version of the swallowing-quality of life scale. / Kim, Ja Young; Kim, Deog Yong; Kim, Hyang Hee; Cho, Sung-Rae.

In: Communication Sciences and Disorders, Vol. 18, No. 3, 01.01.2013, p. 341-347.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A validation study of the Korean version of the swallowing-quality of life scale

AU - Kim, Ja Young

AU - Kim, Deog Yong

AU - Kim, Hyang Hee

AU - Cho, Sung-Rae

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Objectives: Although impairment of the swallowing function is a troublesome symptom in the general population, until recently, there has been no instrument for evaluating dysphagia. The aim of this work is to study the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Swallowing-Quality of Life questionnaire (K-SWAL-QOL). Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 53 patients, who are clinically diagnosed as neurological or mechanical oropharyngeal dysphagia and have shown consistent symptoms of dysphagia during at least 6 months, was conducted. Fifty-three healthy age matched controls were recruited to evaluate the validity and reliability of K-SWAL-QOL. Among the participants of this study, 5 patients and 5 healthy controls were randomly chosen for the test-retest reliability. Results: Reliability was estimated using tests of internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The K-SWAL-QOL was able to differentiate between dysphagic and nondysphagic patients. Construct validity was validated through a factor analysis. The psychometric properties of the K-SWAL-QOL were found to be largely similar to those of the original SWAL-QOL; however, 10 factors are clustered by 7 factors (Mental Health, Social Functioning, Eating Related, General Health, Communication, Burden, and Food Selection). A correlation study of the total score between the K-SWAL-QOL and the SF-36 (The Short Form-36), which is a widely used generic questionnaire for measuring health-related QOL, showed no significant results. Conclusion: K-SWAL-QOL is found to be a clinically valid and reliable tool for assessing the quality of life among Korean individuals with dysphagia. We expect that K-SWAL-QOL will contribute to improve the quality of life for Korean patients with dysphagia in the future.

AB - Objectives: Although impairment of the swallowing function is a troublesome symptom in the general population, until recently, there has been no instrument for evaluating dysphagia. The aim of this work is to study the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Swallowing-Quality of Life questionnaire (K-SWAL-QOL). Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 53 patients, who are clinically diagnosed as neurological or mechanical oropharyngeal dysphagia and have shown consistent symptoms of dysphagia during at least 6 months, was conducted. Fifty-three healthy age matched controls were recruited to evaluate the validity and reliability of K-SWAL-QOL. Among the participants of this study, 5 patients and 5 healthy controls were randomly chosen for the test-retest reliability. Results: Reliability was estimated using tests of internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The K-SWAL-QOL was able to differentiate between dysphagic and nondysphagic patients. Construct validity was validated through a factor analysis. The psychometric properties of the K-SWAL-QOL were found to be largely similar to those of the original SWAL-QOL; however, 10 factors are clustered by 7 factors (Mental Health, Social Functioning, Eating Related, General Health, Communication, Burden, and Food Selection). A correlation study of the total score between the K-SWAL-QOL and the SF-36 (The Short Form-36), which is a widely used generic questionnaire for measuring health-related QOL, showed no significant results. Conclusion: K-SWAL-QOL is found to be a clinically valid and reliable tool for assessing the quality of life among Korean individuals with dysphagia. We expect that K-SWAL-QOL will contribute to improve the quality of life for Korean patients with dysphagia in the future.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955320913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955320913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.12963/csd.13038

DO - 10.12963/csd.13038

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84955320913

VL - 18

SP - 341

EP - 347

JO - Communication Sciences and Disorders

JF - Communication Sciences and Disorders

SN - 2288-1328

IS - 3

ER -