Acquiescence and Resistance in Disconfirming Responses to Polar Questions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Here I examine three forms of disconfirming responses to polar questions in Korean conversation: type-conforming “no” responses, direct nonconforming responses such as repetitions of the question with negation, and nondirect nonconforming responses such as replacements. The use of these forms tends to be different depending on the particular form of question. When questions are in unmarked form with no interrogative endings, indexing a knowing stance, type-conforming responses accept the question and the questioner's epistemic stance. Both direct and nondirect nonconforming responses, by contrast, resist the question's constraints and the knowing stance taken by the questioner. When questions are marked with interrogative endings, encoding an unknowing stance, “no” responses resist the questioner's epistemic stance, treating the matter at hand as already known. Direct nonconforming responses depart from the terms and constraints of the question, whereas nondirect nonconforming responses provide new information addressed to the question's agenda, accepting the questioner's unknowing stance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)124-142
Number of pages19
JournalDiscourse Processes
Volume54
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Feb 17

Fingerprint

indexing
conversation
Polar Questions
Stance
Interrogatives

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{6af702ce770c4c87b48d977dc31ce29e,
title = "Acquiescence and Resistance in Disconfirming Responses to Polar Questions",
abstract = "Here I examine three forms of disconfirming responses to polar questions in Korean conversation: type-conforming “no” responses, direct nonconforming responses such as repetitions of the question with negation, and nondirect nonconforming responses such as replacements. The use of these forms tends to be different depending on the particular form of question. When questions are in unmarked form with no interrogative endings, indexing a knowing stance, type-conforming responses accept the question and the questioner's epistemic stance. Both direct and nondirect nonconforming responses, by contrast, resist the question's constraints and the knowing stance taken by the questioner. When questions are marked with interrogative endings, encoding an unknowing stance, “no” responses resist the questioner's epistemic stance, treating the matter at hand as already known. Direct nonconforming responses depart from the terms and constraints of the question, whereas nondirect nonconforming responses provide new information addressed to the question's agenda, accepting the questioner's unknowing stance.",
author = "Seung-Hee Lee",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1080/0163853X.2015.1101329",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "124--142",
journal = "Discourse Processes",
issn = "0163-853X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Acquiescence and Resistance in Disconfirming Responses to Polar Questions. / Lee, Seung-Hee.

In: Discourse Processes, Vol. 54, No. 2, 17.02.2017, p. 124-142.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acquiescence and Resistance in Disconfirming Responses to Polar Questions

AU - Lee, Seung-Hee

PY - 2017/2/17

Y1 - 2017/2/17

N2 - Here I examine three forms of disconfirming responses to polar questions in Korean conversation: type-conforming “no” responses, direct nonconforming responses such as repetitions of the question with negation, and nondirect nonconforming responses such as replacements. The use of these forms tends to be different depending on the particular form of question. When questions are in unmarked form with no interrogative endings, indexing a knowing stance, type-conforming responses accept the question and the questioner's epistemic stance. Both direct and nondirect nonconforming responses, by contrast, resist the question's constraints and the knowing stance taken by the questioner. When questions are marked with interrogative endings, encoding an unknowing stance, “no” responses resist the questioner's epistemic stance, treating the matter at hand as already known. Direct nonconforming responses depart from the terms and constraints of the question, whereas nondirect nonconforming responses provide new information addressed to the question's agenda, accepting the questioner's unknowing stance.

AB - Here I examine three forms of disconfirming responses to polar questions in Korean conversation: type-conforming “no” responses, direct nonconforming responses such as repetitions of the question with negation, and nondirect nonconforming responses such as replacements. The use of these forms tends to be different depending on the particular form of question. When questions are in unmarked form with no interrogative endings, indexing a knowing stance, type-conforming responses accept the question and the questioner's epistemic stance. Both direct and nondirect nonconforming responses, by contrast, resist the question's constraints and the knowing stance taken by the questioner. When questions are marked with interrogative endings, encoding an unknowing stance, “no” responses resist the questioner's epistemic stance, treating the matter at hand as already known. Direct nonconforming responses depart from the terms and constraints of the question, whereas nondirect nonconforming responses provide new information addressed to the question's agenda, accepting the questioner's unknowing stance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84980417134&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84980417134&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0163853X.2015.1101329

DO - 10.1080/0163853X.2015.1101329

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84980417134

VL - 54

SP - 124

EP - 142

JO - Discourse Processes

JF - Discourse Processes

SN - 0163-853X

IS - 2

ER -