Additional targeted biopsy in clinically suspected prostate cancer: Prospective randomized comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and sonoelastography guidance

Jieun Koh; Dae Chul Jung; Young Taik Oh; Moon Gyu Yoo; Songmi Noh; Kyung Hwa Han; Koon Ho Rha; Young Deuk Choi; Sung Joon Hong

doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.06.024

Additional targeted biopsy in clinically suspected prostate cancer: Prospective randomized comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and sonoelastography guidance

Jieun Koh, Dae Chul Jung, Young Taik Oh, Moon Gyu Yoo, Songmi Noh, Kyung Hwa Han, Koon Ho Rha, Young Deuk Choi, Sung Joon Hong

Department of Urology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Our aim was to improve the detection of prostate cancer by evaluating whether contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) or sonoelastography (SE) is more helpful in guiding targeted biopsy (TB) performed before systematic biopsy (SB). A total of 52 patients suspected of having prostate cancer were prospectively included and randomly assigned to either the CEUS or SE group. Different, independent radiologists performed TB and twelve-core SB. Within each group, cancer detection rates based on core number were compared between SB and TB. We evaluated the effect of TB on core-based cancer detection rates between the CEUS and SE groups. Cancer detection was higher in overall TB cores 16.4% (28/171) than SB cores 11.4% (71/624) in both groups. In the SE group, TB cores revealed higher cancer detection than did SB cores from 4.49% (14/312) to 12.86% (9/70) (p = 0.01). Compared with CEUS, SE may improve detection rates when considering additional TB guidance methods.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	2836-2841
Number of pages	6
Journal	Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume	41
Issue number	11
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.06.024
Publication status	Published - 2015 Nov

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This study was financially supported by the “Dongwha Holdings” Faculty Research Assistance Program of Yonsei University College of Medicine for 2012 (6-2012-0098). D.C.J. was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (Grant NRF-2012 R1 A1 A1042668).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
Biophysics
Acoustics and Ultrasonics

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.06.024

Cite this

Koh, J., Jung, D. C., Oh, Y. T., Yoo, M. G., Noh, S., Han, K. H., Rha, K. H., Choi, Y. D., & Hong, S. J. (2015). Additional targeted biopsy in clinically suspected prostate cancer: Prospective randomized comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and sonoelastography guidance. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 41(11), 2836-2841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.06.024

Koh, Jieun ; Jung, Dae Chul ; Oh, Young Taik ; Yoo, Moon Gyu ; Noh, Songmi ; Han, Kyung Hwa ; Rha, Koon Ho ; Choi, Young Deuk ; Hong, Sung Joon. / Additional targeted biopsy in clinically suspected prostate cancer : Prospective randomized comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and sonoelastography guidance. In: Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2015 ; Vol. 41, No. 11. pp. 2836-2841.

@article{d59e234a1c514aad92ad0070e909ed54,

title = "Additional targeted biopsy in clinically suspected prostate cancer: Prospective randomized comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and sonoelastography guidance",

abstract = "Our aim was to improve the detection of prostate cancer by evaluating whether contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) or sonoelastography (SE) is more helpful in guiding targeted biopsy (TB) performed before systematic biopsy (SB). A total of 52 patients suspected of having prostate cancer were prospectively included and randomly assigned to either the CEUS or SE group. Different, independent radiologists performed TB and twelve-core SB. Within each group, cancer detection rates based on core number were compared between SB and TB. We evaluated the effect of TB on core-based cancer detection rates between the CEUS and SE groups. Cancer detection was higher in overall TB cores 16.4% (28/171) than SB cores 11.4% (71/624) in both groups. In the SE group, TB cores revealed higher cancer detection than did SB cores from 4.49% (14/312) to 12.86% (9/70) (p = 0.01). Compared with CEUS, SE may improve detection rates when considering additional TB guidance methods.",

author = "Jieun Koh and Jung, {Dae Chul} and Oh, {Young Taik} and Yoo, {Moon Gyu} and Songmi Noh and Han, {Kyung Hwa} and Rha, {Koon Ho} and Choi, {Young Deuk} and Hong, {Sung Joon}",

note = "Funding Information: This study was financially supported by the “Dongwha Holdings” Faculty Research Assistance Program of Yonsei University College of Medicine for 2012 (6-2012-0098). D.C.J. was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (Grant NRF-2012 R1 A1 A1042668). Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2015 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.",

year = "2015",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.06.024",

language = "English",

volume = "41",

pages = "2836--2841",

journal = "Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology",

issn = "0301-5629",

publisher = "Elsevier USA",

number = "11",

}

Koh, J, Jung, DC, Oh, YT, Yoo, MG, Noh, S, Han, KH, Rha, KH , Choi, YD & Hong, SJ 2015, 'Additional targeted biopsy in clinically suspected prostate cancer: Prospective randomized comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and sonoelastography guidance', Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 2836-2841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.06.024

Additional targeted biopsy in clinically suspected prostate cancer : Prospective randomized comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and sonoelastography guidance. / Koh, Jieun; Jung, Dae Chul; Oh, Young Taik; Yoo, Moon Gyu; Noh, Songmi; Han, Kyung Hwa; Rha, Koon Ho ; Choi, Young Deuk; Hong, Sung Joon.

In: Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 41, No. 11, 11.2015, p. 2836-2841.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Additional targeted biopsy in clinically suspected prostate cancer

T2 - Prospective randomized comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and sonoelastography guidance

AU - Koh, Jieun

AU - Jung, Dae Chul

AU - Oh, Young Taik

AU - Yoo, Moon Gyu

AU - Noh, Songmi

AU - Han, Kyung Hwa

AU - Rha, Koon Ho

AU - Choi, Young Deuk

AU - Hong, Sung Joon

N1 - Funding Information: This study was financially supported by the “Dongwha Holdings” Faculty Research Assistance Program of Yonsei University College of Medicine for 2012 (6-2012-0098). D.C.J. was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (Grant NRF-2012 R1 A1 A1042668). Publisher Copyright: © 2015 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.

PY - 2015/11

Y1 - 2015/11

N2 - Our aim was to improve the detection of prostate cancer by evaluating whether contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) or sonoelastography (SE) is more helpful in guiding targeted biopsy (TB) performed before systematic biopsy (SB). A total of 52 patients suspected of having prostate cancer were prospectively included and randomly assigned to either the CEUS or SE group. Different, independent radiologists performed TB and twelve-core SB. Within each group, cancer detection rates based on core number were compared between SB and TB. We evaluated the effect of TB on core-based cancer detection rates between the CEUS and SE groups. Cancer detection was higher in overall TB cores 16.4% (28/171) than SB cores 11.4% (71/624) in both groups. In the SE group, TB cores revealed higher cancer detection than did SB cores from 4.49% (14/312) to 12.86% (9/70) (p = 0.01). Compared with CEUS, SE may improve detection rates when considering additional TB guidance methods.

AB - Our aim was to improve the detection of prostate cancer by evaluating whether contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) or sonoelastography (SE) is more helpful in guiding targeted biopsy (TB) performed before systematic biopsy (SB). A total of 52 patients suspected of having prostate cancer were prospectively included and randomly assigned to either the CEUS or SE group. Different, independent radiologists performed TB and twelve-core SB. Within each group, cancer detection rates based on core number were compared between SB and TB. We evaluated the effect of TB on core-based cancer detection rates between the CEUS and SE groups. Cancer detection was higher in overall TB cores 16.4% (28/171) than SB cores 11.4% (71/624) in both groups. In the SE group, TB cores revealed higher cancer detection than did SB cores from 4.49% (14/312) to 12.86% (9/70) (p = 0.01). Compared with CEUS, SE may improve detection rates when considering additional TB guidance methods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943580847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84943580847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.06.024

DO - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.06.024

M3 - Article

C2 - 26298036

AN - SCOPUS:84943580847

VL - 41

SP - 2836

EP - 2841

JO - Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

JF - Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

SN - 0301-5629

IS - 11

ER -

Additional targeted biopsy in clinically suspected prostate cancer: Prospective randomized comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and sonoelastography guidance

Abstract

Bibliographical note

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this