Agreement between monthly precipitation estimates from TRMM satellite, NCEP reanalysis, and merged gauge-satellite analysis

Dong Bin Shin, Ju Hye Kim, Hyo Jin Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Global monthly precipitation is a critical element in understanding variability of the Earth's climate including changes in the hydrological cycle associated with global warming. The NCEP reanalysis (R1), GPCP, CMAP, and TMPA precipitation data sets are often used in climate studies. This study compares the data sets (R1, GPCP, CMAP, and TMPA) with the TRMM precipitation data sets derived from the TRMM precipitation radar (TPR), microwave imager (TMI), and combined algorithm (TCA) for 11 years (1998-2008) over the satellite's domain (40°S-40°N). The domain precipitation estimates from seven data sets range from 2.44 to 3.38 mm d-1 over the ocean and from 1.98 to 2.83 mm d-1 over land. The regional differences between the TPR and the other data sets are analyzed by a paired t test. Particularly, statistically significant differences between TPR and GPCP and between TPR and CMAP are found in most oceanic regions and in some land areas. In general, there exists substantial disagreement in precipitation intensities from the precipitation data sets. Therefore, significant consideration is given to the uncertainties in the data sets prior to applying the results to climate studies such as estimations of the global hydrological budget analyses. Meanwhile, the anomalies from all the data sets agree relatively well in their variability patterns. It is also found that the dominant mode of interannual variability which is associated with the ENSO pattern is clearly demonstrated by all precipitation data sets. These results suggest that all considered precipitation data sets may produce similar results when they are used for climate variability analyses on annual to interannual time scales.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberD16105
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Volume116
Issue number16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Jan 1

Fingerprint

TRMM satellite
radar
TRMM
gauges
Gages
gauge
Radar
Satellites
estimates
climate
hydrologic cycle
Global warming
Image sensors
Climate change
global warming
uncertainty
oceans
Earth (planet)
Microwaves
climate change

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geophysics
  • Forestry
  • Oceanography
  • Aquatic Science
  • Ecology
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Soil Science
  • Geochemistry and Petrology
  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Space and Planetary Science
  • Palaeontology

Cite this

@article{5e48eac464a94e429cccfc9264ba9790,
title = "Agreement between monthly precipitation estimates from TRMM satellite, NCEP reanalysis, and merged gauge-satellite analysis",
abstract = "Global monthly precipitation is a critical element in understanding variability of the Earth's climate including changes in the hydrological cycle associated with global warming. The NCEP reanalysis (R1), GPCP, CMAP, and TMPA precipitation data sets are often used in climate studies. This study compares the data sets (R1, GPCP, CMAP, and TMPA) with the TRMM precipitation data sets derived from the TRMM precipitation radar (TPR), microwave imager (TMI), and combined algorithm (TCA) for 11 years (1998-2008) over the satellite's domain (40°S-40°N). The domain precipitation estimates from seven data sets range from 2.44 to 3.38 mm d-1 over the ocean and from 1.98 to 2.83 mm d-1 over land. The regional differences between the TPR and the other data sets are analyzed by a paired t test. Particularly, statistically significant differences between TPR and GPCP and between TPR and CMAP are found in most oceanic regions and in some land areas. In general, there exists substantial disagreement in precipitation intensities from the precipitation data sets. Therefore, significant consideration is given to the uncertainties in the data sets prior to applying the results to climate studies such as estimations of the global hydrological budget analyses. Meanwhile, the anomalies from all the data sets agree relatively well in their variability patterns. It is also found that the dominant mode of interannual variability which is associated with the ENSO pattern is clearly demonstrated by all precipitation data sets. These results suggest that all considered precipitation data sets may produce similar results when they are used for climate variability analyses on annual to interannual time scales.",
author = "Shin, {Dong Bin} and Kim, {Ju Hye} and Park, {Hyo Jin}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1029/2010JD015483",
language = "English",
volume = "116",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface",
issn = "2169-897X",
number = "16",

}

Agreement between monthly precipitation estimates from TRMM satellite, NCEP reanalysis, and merged gauge-satellite analysis. / Shin, Dong Bin; Kim, Ju Hye; Park, Hyo Jin.

In: Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Vol. 116, No. 16, D16105, 01.01.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Agreement between monthly precipitation estimates from TRMM satellite, NCEP reanalysis, and merged gauge-satellite analysis

AU - Shin, Dong Bin

AU - Kim, Ju Hye

AU - Park, Hyo Jin

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Global monthly precipitation is a critical element in understanding variability of the Earth's climate including changes in the hydrological cycle associated with global warming. The NCEP reanalysis (R1), GPCP, CMAP, and TMPA precipitation data sets are often used in climate studies. This study compares the data sets (R1, GPCP, CMAP, and TMPA) with the TRMM precipitation data sets derived from the TRMM precipitation radar (TPR), microwave imager (TMI), and combined algorithm (TCA) for 11 years (1998-2008) over the satellite's domain (40°S-40°N). The domain precipitation estimates from seven data sets range from 2.44 to 3.38 mm d-1 over the ocean and from 1.98 to 2.83 mm d-1 over land. The regional differences between the TPR and the other data sets are analyzed by a paired t test. Particularly, statistically significant differences between TPR and GPCP and between TPR and CMAP are found in most oceanic regions and in some land areas. In general, there exists substantial disagreement in precipitation intensities from the precipitation data sets. Therefore, significant consideration is given to the uncertainties in the data sets prior to applying the results to climate studies such as estimations of the global hydrological budget analyses. Meanwhile, the anomalies from all the data sets agree relatively well in their variability patterns. It is also found that the dominant mode of interannual variability which is associated with the ENSO pattern is clearly demonstrated by all precipitation data sets. These results suggest that all considered precipitation data sets may produce similar results when they are used for climate variability analyses on annual to interannual time scales.

AB - Global monthly precipitation is a critical element in understanding variability of the Earth's climate including changes in the hydrological cycle associated with global warming. The NCEP reanalysis (R1), GPCP, CMAP, and TMPA precipitation data sets are often used in climate studies. This study compares the data sets (R1, GPCP, CMAP, and TMPA) with the TRMM precipitation data sets derived from the TRMM precipitation radar (TPR), microwave imager (TMI), and combined algorithm (TCA) for 11 years (1998-2008) over the satellite's domain (40°S-40°N). The domain precipitation estimates from seven data sets range from 2.44 to 3.38 mm d-1 over the ocean and from 1.98 to 2.83 mm d-1 over land. The regional differences between the TPR and the other data sets are analyzed by a paired t test. Particularly, statistically significant differences between TPR and GPCP and between TPR and CMAP are found in most oceanic regions and in some land areas. In general, there exists substantial disagreement in precipitation intensities from the precipitation data sets. Therefore, significant consideration is given to the uncertainties in the data sets prior to applying the results to climate studies such as estimations of the global hydrological budget analyses. Meanwhile, the anomalies from all the data sets agree relatively well in their variability patterns. It is also found that the dominant mode of interannual variability which is associated with the ENSO pattern is clearly demonstrated by all precipitation data sets. These results suggest that all considered precipitation data sets may produce similar results when they are used for climate variability analyses on annual to interannual time scales.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052276443&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052276443&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1029/2010JD015483

DO - 10.1029/2010JD015483

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:80052276443

VL - 116

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface

SN - 2169-897X

IS - 16

M1 - D16105

ER -