An assessment of sampling, preservation, and analytical procedures for arsenic speciation in potentially contaminated waters

Youn Tae Kim, Hyeon Yoon, Cheolho Yoon, Nam Chil Woo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study was undertaken to ascertain optimal methods of sampling, preserving, separating, and analyzing arsenic species in potentially contaminated waters. Arsenic species are readily transformed in nature by slight changes in conditions. Each species has a different toxicity and mobility. The conventional field sampling method using filters of 0.45 μm in size could overestimate the dissolved arsenic concentrations, as passing suspended particles that can act as a sink or source of arsenic depending on the site condition. For arsenic species in neutral pH and iron-poor waters, the precipitation can be stable for up to 3 days without any treatment, but for longer periods, a preservative, such as phosphoric acid, is required. Also, the analytical procedure must be selected carefully because the levels and hydride generation efficiencies of arsenic in different species can vary, even for the same amount of arsenic. For arsenic speciation in samples that also include organic species, a hybrid high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) gave the best resolution and lowest detection limits. However, the procedure using a solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridge can be used economically and conveniently for analyzing samples containing only inorganic arsenic species, such as groundwater, especially that related to mine activity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)337-346
Number of pages10
JournalEnvironmental Geochemistry and Health
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007 Aug 1

Fingerprint

Arsenic
arsenic
Sampling
Water
sampling
water
Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
preservative
Solid Phase Extraction
Groundwater
High performance liquid chromatography
Phosphoric acid
Hydrides
Toxicity
Limit of Detection
liquid chromatography
Mass Spectrometry
Iron
mass spectrometry
High Pressure Liquid Chromatography

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Geochemistry and Petrology

Cite this

@article{a92f3fe28bed414cb3a42d797569b79d,
title = "An assessment of sampling, preservation, and analytical procedures for arsenic speciation in potentially contaminated waters",
abstract = "This study was undertaken to ascertain optimal methods of sampling, preserving, separating, and analyzing arsenic species in potentially contaminated waters. Arsenic species are readily transformed in nature by slight changes in conditions. Each species has a different toxicity and mobility. The conventional field sampling method using filters of 0.45 μm in size could overestimate the dissolved arsenic concentrations, as passing suspended particles that can act as a sink or source of arsenic depending on the site condition. For arsenic species in neutral pH and iron-poor waters, the precipitation can be stable for up to 3 days without any treatment, but for longer periods, a preservative, such as phosphoric acid, is required. Also, the analytical procedure must be selected carefully because the levels and hydride generation efficiencies of arsenic in different species can vary, even for the same amount of arsenic. For arsenic speciation in samples that also include organic species, a hybrid high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) gave the best resolution and lowest detection limits. However, the procedure using a solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridge can be used economically and conveniently for analyzing samples containing only inorganic arsenic species, such as groundwater, especially that related to mine activity.",
author = "Kim, {Youn Tae} and Hyeon Yoon and Cheolho Yoon and Woo, {Nam Chil}",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10653-007-9091-3",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "337--346",
journal = "Environmental Geochemistry and Health",
issn = "0269-4042",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

An assessment of sampling, preservation, and analytical procedures for arsenic speciation in potentially contaminated waters. / Kim, Youn Tae; Yoon, Hyeon; Yoon, Cheolho; Woo, Nam Chil.

In: Environmental Geochemistry and Health, Vol. 29, No. 4, 01.08.2007, p. 337-346.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An assessment of sampling, preservation, and analytical procedures for arsenic speciation in potentially contaminated waters

AU - Kim, Youn Tae

AU - Yoon, Hyeon

AU - Yoon, Cheolho

AU - Woo, Nam Chil

PY - 2007/8/1

Y1 - 2007/8/1

N2 - This study was undertaken to ascertain optimal methods of sampling, preserving, separating, and analyzing arsenic species in potentially contaminated waters. Arsenic species are readily transformed in nature by slight changes in conditions. Each species has a different toxicity and mobility. The conventional field sampling method using filters of 0.45 μm in size could overestimate the dissolved arsenic concentrations, as passing suspended particles that can act as a sink or source of arsenic depending on the site condition. For arsenic species in neutral pH and iron-poor waters, the precipitation can be stable for up to 3 days without any treatment, but for longer periods, a preservative, such as phosphoric acid, is required. Also, the analytical procedure must be selected carefully because the levels and hydride generation efficiencies of arsenic in different species can vary, even for the same amount of arsenic. For arsenic speciation in samples that also include organic species, a hybrid high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) gave the best resolution and lowest detection limits. However, the procedure using a solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridge can be used economically and conveniently for analyzing samples containing only inorganic arsenic species, such as groundwater, especially that related to mine activity.

AB - This study was undertaken to ascertain optimal methods of sampling, preserving, separating, and analyzing arsenic species in potentially contaminated waters. Arsenic species are readily transformed in nature by slight changes in conditions. Each species has a different toxicity and mobility. The conventional field sampling method using filters of 0.45 μm in size could overestimate the dissolved arsenic concentrations, as passing suspended particles that can act as a sink or source of arsenic depending on the site condition. For arsenic species in neutral pH and iron-poor waters, the precipitation can be stable for up to 3 days without any treatment, but for longer periods, a preservative, such as phosphoric acid, is required. Also, the analytical procedure must be selected carefully because the levels and hydride generation efficiencies of arsenic in different species can vary, even for the same amount of arsenic. For arsenic speciation in samples that also include organic species, a hybrid high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) gave the best resolution and lowest detection limits. However, the procedure using a solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridge can be used economically and conveniently for analyzing samples containing only inorganic arsenic species, such as groundwater, especially that related to mine activity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547221509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547221509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10653-007-9091-3

DO - 10.1007/s10653-007-9091-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 17505895

AN - SCOPUS:34547221509

VL - 29

SP - 337

EP - 346

JO - Environmental Geochemistry and Health

JF - Environmental Geochemistry and Health

SN - 0269-4042

IS - 4

ER -