An empirical analysis of issues and trends in manufacturing productivity through a 30-year literature review

C. H. Lee, C. S. Leem

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper analysed the keywords in manufacturing productivity-related studies over the last 30 years to consider the change in the concept of ‘productivity’, a longstanding and important factor in studies about manufacturing. After first identifying 110,269 keywords in related research through 11,237 academic papers, we narrowed them down to 97 in nine categories by applying certain criteria. Most of the previous studies dealt with productivity in the context of corporate data; but this study investigated the change in the concept of manufacturing productivity by analysing the keywords of many studies of this concept. We classified the 30 years from 1980 to 2009 into five eras of productivity, according to their representative characteristics, using the analysed keywords. We expect that this study will serve as a practical guideline for managers in industry, and as an academic foundation for future research into productivity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)147-159
Number of pages13
JournalSouth African Journal of Industrial Engineering
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Productivity
Managers
Industry

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

@article{6433bead8e724a388b1b9f8798999c31,
title = "An empirical analysis of issues and trends in manufacturing productivity through a 30-year literature review",
abstract = "This paper analysed the keywords in manufacturing productivity-related studies over the last 30 years to consider the change in the concept of ‘productivity’, a longstanding and important factor in studies about manufacturing. After first identifying 110,269 keywords in related research through 11,237 academic papers, we narrowed them down to 97 in nine categories by applying certain criteria. Most of the previous studies dealt with productivity in the context of corporate data; but this study investigated the change in the concept of manufacturing productivity by analysing the keywords of many studies of this concept. We classified the 30 years from 1980 to 2009 into five eras of productivity, according to their representative characteristics, using the analysed keywords. We expect that this study will serve as a practical guideline for managers in industry, and as an academic foundation for future research into productivity.",
author = "Lee, {C. H.} and Leem, {C. S.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7166/27-2-1363",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "147--159",
journal = "South African Journal of Industrial Engineering",
issn = "1012-277X",
publisher = "South African Institute of Industrial Engineers",
number = "2",

}

An empirical analysis of issues and trends in manufacturing productivity through a 30-year literature review. / Lee, C. H.; Leem, C. S.

In: South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, Vol. 27, No. 2, 01.01.2016, p. 147-159.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - An empirical analysis of issues and trends in manufacturing productivity through a 30-year literature review

AU - Lee, C. H.

AU - Leem, C. S.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - This paper analysed the keywords in manufacturing productivity-related studies over the last 30 years to consider the change in the concept of ‘productivity’, a longstanding and important factor in studies about manufacturing. After first identifying 110,269 keywords in related research through 11,237 academic papers, we narrowed them down to 97 in nine categories by applying certain criteria. Most of the previous studies dealt with productivity in the context of corporate data; but this study investigated the change in the concept of manufacturing productivity by analysing the keywords of many studies of this concept. We classified the 30 years from 1980 to 2009 into five eras of productivity, according to their representative characteristics, using the analysed keywords. We expect that this study will serve as a practical guideline for managers in industry, and as an academic foundation for future research into productivity.

AB - This paper analysed the keywords in manufacturing productivity-related studies over the last 30 years to consider the change in the concept of ‘productivity’, a longstanding and important factor in studies about manufacturing. After first identifying 110,269 keywords in related research through 11,237 academic papers, we narrowed them down to 97 in nine categories by applying certain criteria. Most of the previous studies dealt with productivity in the context of corporate data; but this study investigated the change in the concept of manufacturing productivity by analysing the keywords of many studies of this concept. We classified the 30 years from 1980 to 2009 into five eras of productivity, according to their representative characteristics, using the analysed keywords. We expect that this study will serve as a practical guideline for managers in industry, and as an academic foundation for future research into productivity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983649245&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983649245&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7166/27-2-1363

DO - 10.7166/27-2-1363

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84983649245

VL - 27

SP - 147

EP - 159

JO - South African Journal of Industrial Engineering

JF - South African Journal of Industrial Engineering

SN - 1012-277X

IS - 2

ER -