An ERP study of plural attraction in attachment ambiguity resolution

Evidence for retrieval interference

Eun-Kyung Lee, Susan M. Garnsey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The memory retrieval processes involved in subject-verb agreement processing in sentence comprehension were examined by recording event-related brain potentials (ERPs) while people read temporarily ambiguous relative clause structures such as The reporter shocked the advisor(s) of the politician(s) who was/were at the meeting. When the relative clause verb was singular, forcing attachment to whichever of the nouns was also singular, the presence of a nearby plural attractor noun created greater interference in the process of retrieving the verb's subject from the memory representation of the sentence so far, revealed by an increased frontal negativity when the attractor noun was plural compared to when it was singular. Crucially, attraction effects did not interact with attachment type. The data suggest that plural attraction effects may arise from retrieval interference in grammatical sentences. The data also suggest that interference from plural attractor nouns in agreement processing is just another instance of the retrieval interference effects that arise whenever it becomes necessary to search the memory representation of a sentence so far to form dependency relationships among the words in the sentence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Neurolinguistics
Volume36
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Nov 1

Fingerprint

Evoked Potentials
interference
brain
event
Brain
evidence
reporter
recording
politician
comprehension
Event-related Brain Potentials
Attraction
Nouns
Interference
Ambiguity Resolution
Attractor
Verbs
Relative Clauses

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

@article{1dd3c5ec298a4c22826f8a172cb3cfd9,
title = "An ERP study of plural attraction in attachment ambiguity resolution: Evidence for retrieval interference",
abstract = "The memory retrieval processes involved in subject-verb agreement processing in sentence comprehension were examined by recording event-related brain potentials (ERPs) while people read temporarily ambiguous relative clause structures such as The reporter shocked the advisor(s) of the politician(s) who was/were at the meeting. When the relative clause verb was singular, forcing attachment to whichever of the nouns was also singular, the presence of a nearby plural attractor noun created greater interference in the process of retrieving the verb's subject from the memory representation of the sentence so far, revealed by an increased frontal negativity when the attractor noun was plural compared to when it was singular. Crucially, attraction effects did not interact with attachment type. The data suggest that plural attraction effects may arise from retrieval interference in grammatical sentences. The data also suggest that interference from plural attractor nouns in agreement processing is just another instance of the retrieval interference effects that arise whenever it becomes necessary to search the memory representation of a sentence so far to form dependency relationships among the words in the sentence.",
author = "Eun-Kyung Lee and Garnsey, {Susan M.}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jneuroling.2015.04.004",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "Journal of Neurolinguistics",
issn = "0911-6044",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

An ERP study of plural attraction in attachment ambiguity resolution : Evidence for retrieval interference. / Lee, Eun-Kyung; Garnsey, Susan M.

In: Journal of Neurolinguistics, Vol. 36, 01.11.2015, p. 1-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An ERP study of plural attraction in attachment ambiguity resolution

T2 - Evidence for retrieval interference

AU - Lee, Eun-Kyung

AU - Garnsey, Susan M.

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - The memory retrieval processes involved in subject-verb agreement processing in sentence comprehension were examined by recording event-related brain potentials (ERPs) while people read temporarily ambiguous relative clause structures such as The reporter shocked the advisor(s) of the politician(s) who was/were at the meeting. When the relative clause verb was singular, forcing attachment to whichever of the nouns was also singular, the presence of a nearby plural attractor noun created greater interference in the process of retrieving the verb's subject from the memory representation of the sentence so far, revealed by an increased frontal negativity when the attractor noun was plural compared to when it was singular. Crucially, attraction effects did not interact with attachment type. The data suggest that plural attraction effects may arise from retrieval interference in grammatical sentences. The data also suggest that interference from plural attractor nouns in agreement processing is just another instance of the retrieval interference effects that arise whenever it becomes necessary to search the memory representation of a sentence so far to form dependency relationships among the words in the sentence.

AB - The memory retrieval processes involved in subject-verb agreement processing in sentence comprehension were examined by recording event-related brain potentials (ERPs) while people read temporarily ambiguous relative clause structures such as The reporter shocked the advisor(s) of the politician(s) who was/were at the meeting. When the relative clause verb was singular, forcing attachment to whichever of the nouns was also singular, the presence of a nearby plural attractor noun created greater interference in the process of retrieving the verb's subject from the memory representation of the sentence so far, revealed by an increased frontal negativity when the attractor noun was plural compared to when it was singular. Crucially, attraction effects did not interact with attachment type. The data suggest that plural attraction effects may arise from retrieval interference in grammatical sentences. The data also suggest that interference from plural attractor nouns in agreement processing is just another instance of the retrieval interference effects that arise whenever it becomes necessary to search the memory representation of a sentence so far to form dependency relationships among the words in the sentence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929395130&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929395130&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2015.04.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2015.04.004

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - Journal of Neurolinguistics

JF - Journal of Neurolinguistics

SN - 0911-6044

ER -