An integrated assessment of the environmental, human health, and economic impacts based on life cycle assessment: A case study of the concrete and steel sumps

Kwangbok Jeong, Changyoon Ji, Hyunjung Kim, Taehoon Hong, Kyuman Cho, Jaewook Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The sustainable building materials and construction methods have been recently highlighted to reduce the environmental and human health impacts. The steel sump is regarded as a suitable alternative to the concrete sump as it has a lower economic impact, but further research on its environmental and human health impacts has yet to be conducted. Thus, this study conducted an integrated assessment of the environmental, human health, and economic impacts of the concrete and steel sumps using life cycle assessment. When the environmental, human health, and economic impacts are considered at the same time, the installation scenarios of the steel sump were superior to those of the concrete sump by 11.35–152.24%. Especially, SS-3 (i.e., installation scenarios #3 of steel sump) has 93.04 and 89.18% lower environmental and human health impacts, respectively, as well as an 81.47% lower construction cost compared to CS-3 (i.e., installation scenarios #3 of concrete sump). This is because the differences in the building material and the practical construction method used determine the environmental, human health, and economic impacts of the sump. The results will help designers or construction managers determine the installation scenario of the sump by considering its environmental, human health, and economic impacts.

Original languageEnglish
Article number118032
JournalJournal of Cleaner Production
Volume239
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Dec 1

Fingerprint

health impact
economic impact
Life cycle
life cycle
steel
Health
Concretes
Economics
Steel
construction method
building construction
human health
Economic impact
Life cycle assessment
Human health
Health impact
Integrated assessment
Managers
Scenarios
cost

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

@article{9b42eef0926f4d6ba8db8bb58020f6da,
title = "An integrated assessment of the environmental, human health, and economic impacts based on life cycle assessment: A case study of the concrete and steel sumps",
abstract = "The sustainable building materials and construction methods have been recently highlighted to reduce the environmental and human health impacts. The steel sump is regarded as a suitable alternative to the concrete sump as it has a lower economic impact, but further research on its environmental and human health impacts has yet to be conducted. Thus, this study conducted an integrated assessment of the environmental, human health, and economic impacts of the concrete and steel sumps using life cycle assessment. When the environmental, human health, and economic impacts are considered at the same time, the installation scenarios of the steel sump were superior to those of the concrete sump by 11.35–152.24{\%}. Especially, SS-3 (i.e., installation scenarios #3 of steel sump) has 93.04 and 89.18{\%} lower environmental and human health impacts, respectively, as well as an 81.47{\%} lower construction cost compared to CS-3 (i.e., installation scenarios #3 of concrete sump). This is because the differences in the building material and the practical construction method used determine the environmental, human health, and economic impacts of the sump. The results will help designers or construction managers determine the installation scenario of the sump by considering its environmental, human health, and economic impacts.",
author = "Kwangbok Jeong and Changyoon Ji and Hyunjung Kim and Taehoon Hong and Kyuman Cho and Jaewook Lee",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118032",
language = "English",
volume = "239",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

An integrated assessment of the environmental, human health, and economic impacts based on life cycle assessment : A case study of the concrete and steel sumps. / Jeong, Kwangbok; Ji, Changyoon; Kim, Hyunjung; Hong, Taehoon; Cho, Kyuman; Lee, Jaewook.

In: Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 239, 118032, 01.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An integrated assessment of the environmental, human health, and economic impacts based on life cycle assessment

T2 - A case study of the concrete and steel sumps

AU - Jeong, Kwangbok

AU - Ji, Changyoon

AU - Kim, Hyunjung

AU - Hong, Taehoon

AU - Cho, Kyuman

AU - Lee, Jaewook

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - The sustainable building materials and construction methods have been recently highlighted to reduce the environmental and human health impacts. The steel sump is regarded as a suitable alternative to the concrete sump as it has a lower economic impact, but further research on its environmental and human health impacts has yet to be conducted. Thus, this study conducted an integrated assessment of the environmental, human health, and economic impacts of the concrete and steel sumps using life cycle assessment. When the environmental, human health, and economic impacts are considered at the same time, the installation scenarios of the steel sump were superior to those of the concrete sump by 11.35–152.24%. Especially, SS-3 (i.e., installation scenarios #3 of steel sump) has 93.04 and 89.18% lower environmental and human health impacts, respectively, as well as an 81.47% lower construction cost compared to CS-3 (i.e., installation scenarios #3 of concrete sump). This is because the differences in the building material and the practical construction method used determine the environmental, human health, and economic impacts of the sump. The results will help designers or construction managers determine the installation scenario of the sump by considering its environmental, human health, and economic impacts.

AB - The sustainable building materials and construction methods have been recently highlighted to reduce the environmental and human health impacts. The steel sump is regarded as a suitable alternative to the concrete sump as it has a lower economic impact, but further research on its environmental and human health impacts has yet to be conducted. Thus, this study conducted an integrated assessment of the environmental, human health, and economic impacts of the concrete and steel sumps using life cycle assessment. When the environmental, human health, and economic impacts are considered at the same time, the installation scenarios of the steel sump were superior to those of the concrete sump by 11.35–152.24%. Especially, SS-3 (i.e., installation scenarios #3 of steel sump) has 93.04 and 89.18% lower environmental and human health impacts, respectively, as well as an 81.47% lower construction cost compared to CS-3 (i.e., installation scenarios #3 of concrete sump). This is because the differences in the building material and the practical construction method used determine the environmental, human health, and economic impacts of the sump. The results will help designers or construction managers determine the installation scenario of the sump by considering its environmental, human health, and economic impacts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070843170&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070843170&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118032

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118032

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85070843170

VL - 239

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

M1 - 118032

ER -