Analogical and Category-Based Inference: A Theoretical Integration With Bayesian Causal Models

Keith J. Holyoak, Hee Seung Lee, Hongjing Lu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A fundamental issue for theories of human induction is to specify constraints on potential inferences. For inferences based on shared category membership, an analogy, and/or a relational schema, it appears that the basic goal of induction is to make accurate and goal-relevant inferences that are sensitive to uncertainty. People can use source information at various levels of abstraction (including both specific instances and more general categories), coupled with prior causal knowledge, to build a causal model for a target situation, which in turn constrains inferences about the target. We propose a computational theory in the framework of Bayesian inference and test its predictions (parameter-free for the cases we consider) in a series of experiments in which people were asked to assess the probabilities of various causal predictions and attributions about a target on the basis of source knowledge about generative and preventive causes. The theory proved successful in accounting for systematic patterns of judgments about interrelated types of causal inferences, including evidence that analogical inferences are partially dissociable from overall mapping quality.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)702-727
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume139
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Nov 1

Fingerprint

Uncertainty

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)
  • Developmental Neuroscience

Cite this

@article{2be69b74a8cc4e7399f030b7e3c5a561,
title = "Analogical and Category-Based Inference: A Theoretical Integration With Bayesian Causal Models",
abstract = "A fundamental issue for theories of human induction is to specify constraints on potential inferences. For inferences based on shared category membership, an analogy, and/or a relational schema, it appears that the basic goal of induction is to make accurate and goal-relevant inferences that are sensitive to uncertainty. People can use source information at various levels of abstraction (including both specific instances and more general categories), coupled with prior causal knowledge, to build a causal model for a target situation, which in turn constrains inferences about the target. We propose a computational theory in the framework of Bayesian inference and test its predictions (parameter-free for the cases we consider) in a series of experiments in which people were asked to assess the probabilities of various causal predictions and attributions about a target on the basis of source knowledge about generative and preventive causes. The theory proved successful in accounting for systematic patterns of judgments about interrelated types of causal inferences, including evidence that analogical inferences are partially dissociable from overall mapping quality.",
author = "Holyoak, {Keith J.} and Lee, {Hee Seung} and Hongjing Lu",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/a0020488",
language = "English",
volume = "139",
pages = "702--727",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: General",
issn = "0096-3445",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Analogical and Category-Based Inference : A Theoretical Integration With Bayesian Causal Models. / Holyoak, Keith J.; Lee, Hee Seung; Lu, Hongjing.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 139, No. 4, 01.11.2010, p. 702-727.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analogical and Category-Based Inference

T2 - A Theoretical Integration With Bayesian Causal Models

AU - Holyoak, Keith J.

AU - Lee, Hee Seung

AU - Lu, Hongjing

PY - 2010/11/1

Y1 - 2010/11/1

N2 - A fundamental issue for theories of human induction is to specify constraints on potential inferences. For inferences based on shared category membership, an analogy, and/or a relational schema, it appears that the basic goal of induction is to make accurate and goal-relevant inferences that are sensitive to uncertainty. People can use source information at various levels of abstraction (including both specific instances and more general categories), coupled with prior causal knowledge, to build a causal model for a target situation, which in turn constrains inferences about the target. We propose a computational theory in the framework of Bayesian inference and test its predictions (parameter-free for the cases we consider) in a series of experiments in which people were asked to assess the probabilities of various causal predictions and attributions about a target on the basis of source knowledge about generative and preventive causes. The theory proved successful in accounting for systematic patterns of judgments about interrelated types of causal inferences, including evidence that analogical inferences are partially dissociable from overall mapping quality.

AB - A fundamental issue for theories of human induction is to specify constraints on potential inferences. For inferences based on shared category membership, an analogy, and/or a relational schema, it appears that the basic goal of induction is to make accurate and goal-relevant inferences that are sensitive to uncertainty. People can use source information at various levels of abstraction (including both specific instances and more general categories), coupled with prior causal knowledge, to build a causal model for a target situation, which in turn constrains inferences about the target. We propose a computational theory in the framework of Bayesian inference and test its predictions (parameter-free for the cases we consider) in a series of experiments in which people were asked to assess the probabilities of various causal predictions and attributions about a target on the basis of source knowledge about generative and preventive causes. The theory proved successful in accounting for systematic patterns of judgments about interrelated types of causal inferences, including evidence that analogical inferences are partially dissociable from overall mapping quality.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78349262693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78349262693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0020488

DO - 10.1037/a0020488

M3 - Article

C2 - 21038985

AN - SCOPUS:78349262693

VL - 139

SP - 702

EP - 727

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

SN - 0096-3445

IS - 4

ER -