Analysis of surgical approaches to skull base tumors involving the pterygopalatine and infratemporal fossa

Hyo Jin Chung, In Seok Moon, Hyung Ju Cho, Chang Hoon Kim, Salma Saud Al Sharhan, Jung Hyun Chang, Joo Heon Yoon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Selecting an appropriate surgical approach for resection of huge skull base tumors involving pterygopalatine and infratemporal fossa is challenging because of their rarity and high possibility of vital anatomical structure injuries. To suggest the guidance of selecting the appropriate approach by analyzing outcomes and satisfactions of known surgical approaches with our previous experience, the authors retrospectively analyzed skull base tumor cases experienced for 24 years, and condensed to 4 well-known surgical approaches: maxillary swing, infratemporal fossa type C, transzygomatic, and a combined transzygomatic-midfacial degloving approach: to review indications, advantages, and limitations of these approaches. Maxillary swing approach was useful in largesized tumors as it provided wide surgical field; however, inevitable facial scar was the main drawbacks, especially in adolescents. Infratemporal fossa approach type C was helpful in the involvement of vital vascular structures; however, long incision scar with temporal area depression and permanent conductive hearing loss were the factors of patients' dissatisfaction. Transzygomatic approach could be the good alternative to the infratemporal fossa approach type C; however, en bloc tumor resection was impossible due to its limited operative space. To overcome limitations of these approaches, transzygomatic approach was combined with midfacial degloving approach, and it enabled lateral and anterior access without prominent facial scar and/or deformity while providing wide surgical space. Based on our 24 years of surgical experience in managing huge skull base tumors, the authors recommend the combined transzygomatic-midfacial degloving approach, which enables complete resection with short postoperative healing periods and no disfiguring facial incisions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)589-595
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Craniofacial Surgery
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Mar 1

Fingerprint

Pterygopalatine Fossa
Skull Base
Cicatrix
Neoplasms
Conductive Hearing Loss
Postoperative Period
Blood Vessels
Depression
Wounds and Injuries

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Chung, Hyo Jin ; Moon, In Seok ; Cho, Hyung Ju ; Kim, Chang Hoon ; Al Sharhan, Salma Saud ; Chang, Jung Hyun ; Yoon, Joo Heon. / Analysis of surgical approaches to skull base tumors involving the pterygopalatine and infratemporal fossa. In: Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2019 ; Vol. 30, No. 2. pp. 589-595.
@article{e12b4b63c8414f27867278842e915a3b,
title = "Analysis of surgical approaches to skull base tumors involving the pterygopalatine and infratemporal fossa",
abstract = "Selecting an appropriate surgical approach for resection of huge skull base tumors involving pterygopalatine and infratemporal fossa is challenging because of their rarity and high possibility of vital anatomical structure injuries. To suggest the guidance of selecting the appropriate approach by analyzing outcomes and satisfactions of known surgical approaches with our previous experience, the authors retrospectively analyzed skull base tumor cases experienced for 24 years, and condensed to 4 well-known surgical approaches: maxillary swing, infratemporal fossa type C, transzygomatic, and a combined transzygomatic-midfacial degloving approach: to review indications, advantages, and limitations of these approaches. Maxillary swing approach was useful in largesized tumors as it provided wide surgical field; however, inevitable facial scar was the main drawbacks, especially in adolescents. Infratemporal fossa approach type C was helpful in the involvement of vital vascular structures; however, long incision scar with temporal area depression and permanent conductive hearing loss were the factors of patients' dissatisfaction. Transzygomatic approach could be the good alternative to the infratemporal fossa approach type C; however, en bloc tumor resection was impossible due to its limited operative space. To overcome limitations of these approaches, transzygomatic approach was combined with midfacial degloving approach, and it enabled lateral and anterior access without prominent facial scar and/or deformity while providing wide surgical space. Based on our 24 years of surgical experience in managing huge skull base tumors, the authors recommend the combined transzygomatic-midfacial degloving approach, which enables complete resection with short postoperative healing periods and no disfiguring facial incisions.",
author = "Chung, {Hyo Jin} and Moon, {In Seok} and Cho, {Hyung Ju} and Kim, {Chang Hoon} and {Al Sharhan}, {Salma Saud} and Chang, {Jung Hyun} and Yoon, {Joo Heon}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SCS.0000000000005108",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "589--595",
journal = "Journal of Craniofacial Surgery",
issn = "1049-2275",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

Analysis of surgical approaches to skull base tumors involving the pterygopalatine and infratemporal fossa. / Chung, Hyo Jin; Moon, In Seok; Cho, Hyung Ju; Kim, Chang Hoon; Al Sharhan, Salma Saud; Chang, Jung Hyun; Yoon, Joo Heon.

In: Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, Vol. 30, No. 2, 01.03.2019, p. 589-595.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of surgical approaches to skull base tumors involving the pterygopalatine and infratemporal fossa

AU - Chung, Hyo Jin

AU - Moon, In Seok

AU - Cho, Hyung Ju

AU - Kim, Chang Hoon

AU - Al Sharhan, Salma Saud

AU - Chang, Jung Hyun

AU - Yoon, Joo Heon

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Selecting an appropriate surgical approach for resection of huge skull base tumors involving pterygopalatine and infratemporal fossa is challenging because of their rarity and high possibility of vital anatomical structure injuries. To suggest the guidance of selecting the appropriate approach by analyzing outcomes and satisfactions of known surgical approaches with our previous experience, the authors retrospectively analyzed skull base tumor cases experienced for 24 years, and condensed to 4 well-known surgical approaches: maxillary swing, infratemporal fossa type C, transzygomatic, and a combined transzygomatic-midfacial degloving approach: to review indications, advantages, and limitations of these approaches. Maxillary swing approach was useful in largesized tumors as it provided wide surgical field; however, inevitable facial scar was the main drawbacks, especially in adolescents. Infratemporal fossa approach type C was helpful in the involvement of vital vascular structures; however, long incision scar with temporal area depression and permanent conductive hearing loss were the factors of patients' dissatisfaction. Transzygomatic approach could be the good alternative to the infratemporal fossa approach type C; however, en bloc tumor resection was impossible due to its limited operative space. To overcome limitations of these approaches, transzygomatic approach was combined with midfacial degloving approach, and it enabled lateral and anterior access without prominent facial scar and/or deformity while providing wide surgical space. Based on our 24 years of surgical experience in managing huge skull base tumors, the authors recommend the combined transzygomatic-midfacial degloving approach, which enables complete resection with short postoperative healing periods and no disfiguring facial incisions.

AB - Selecting an appropriate surgical approach for resection of huge skull base tumors involving pterygopalatine and infratemporal fossa is challenging because of their rarity and high possibility of vital anatomical structure injuries. To suggest the guidance of selecting the appropriate approach by analyzing outcomes and satisfactions of known surgical approaches with our previous experience, the authors retrospectively analyzed skull base tumor cases experienced for 24 years, and condensed to 4 well-known surgical approaches: maxillary swing, infratemporal fossa type C, transzygomatic, and a combined transzygomatic-midfacial degloving approach: to review indications, advantages, and limitations of these approaches. Maxillary swing approach was useful in largesized tumors as it provided wide surgical field; however, inevitable facial scar was the main drawbacks, especially in adolescents. Infratemporal fossa approach type C was helpful in the involvement of vital vascular structures; however, long incision scar with temporal area depression and permanent conductive hearing loss were the factors of patients' dissatisfaction. Transzygomatic approach could be the good alternative to the infratemporal fossa approach type C; however, en bloc tumor resection was impossible due to its limited operative space. To overcome limitations of these approaches, transzygomatic approach was combined with midfacial degloving approach, and it enabled lateral and anterior access without prominent facial scar and/or deformity while providing wide surgical space. Based on our 24 years of surgical experience in managing huge skull base tumors, the authors recommend the combined transzygomatic-midfacial degloving approach, which enables complete resection with short postoperative healing periods and no disfiguring facial incisions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067309762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067309762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005108

DO - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005108

M3 - Article

C2 - 30640855

AN - SCOPUS:85067309762

VL - 30

SP - 589

EP - 595

JO - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

JF - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

SN - 1049-2275

IS - 2

ER -