Analyzing Disaster Loss Trends: A Comparison of Normalization Methodologies in South Korea

Donghyun Choi, David Oliver Kasdan, Dong Keun Yoon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Increasing concern for climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction is driving the need for more accurate and sophisticated tools of analysis to protect populations. Standards of analysis that can normalize measurements under various contexts are particularly valuable in the global arena of disaster management. One concern that may benefit from normalizing is the analysis of disaster loss trends. Previous studies have used a combination of inflation, wealth, and societal factors in their normalization of disaster loss methodologies. This study examines the various normalization methods in previous research and applies a selection of eight formulae to 50 years of disaster data in South Korea. The results show both decreasing and increasing trends in disaster damage losses based on the methods, but there are curious biases under the results that may be artifacts of Korea's unique experiences in economic development. The conclusion discusses how the case of Korea may help to clarify the optimal normalization methodology for other countries.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)859-870
Number of pages12
JournalRisk Analysis
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Apr 1

Fingerprint

Republic of Korea
Disasters
Korea
Economic Development
Climate Change
Economic Inflation
Risk Reduction Behavior
Climate change
Artifacts
Economics
Research
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Choi, Donghyun ; Kasdan, David Oliver ; Yoon, Dong Keun. / Analyzing Disaster Loss Trends : A Comparison of Normalization Methodologies in South Korea. In: Risk Analysis. 2019 ; Vol. 39, No. 4. pp. 859-870.
@article{a6ba825d3b5d4ff984d8832b91f2b918,
title = "Analyzing Disaster Loss Trends: A Comparison of Normalization Methodologies in South Korea",
abstract = "Increasing concern for climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction is driving the need for more accurate and sophisticated tools of analysis to protect populations. Standards of analysis that can normalize measurements under various contexts are particularly valuable in the global arena of disaster management. One concern that may benefit from normalizing is the analysis of disaster loss trends. Previous studies have used a combination of inflation, wealth, and societal factors in their normalization of disaster loss methodologies. This study examines the various normalization methods in previous research and applies a selection of eight formulae to 50 years of disaster data in South Korea. The results show both decreasing and increasing trends in disaster damage losses based on the methods, but there are curious biases under the results that may be artifacts of Korea's unique experiences in economic development. The conclusion discusses how the case of Korea may help to clarify the optimal normalization methodology for other countries.",
author = "Donghyun Choi and Kasdan, {David Oliver} and Yoon, {Dong Keun}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/risa.13208",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "859--870",
journal = "Risk Analysis",
issn = "0272-4332",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Analyzing Disaster Loss Trends : A Comparison of Normalization Methodologies in South Korea. / Choi, Donghyun; Kasdan, David Oliver; Yoon, Dong Keun.

In: Risk Analysis, Vol. 39, No. 4, 01.04.2019, p. 859-870.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analyzing Disaster Loss Trends

T2 - A Comparison of Normalization Methodologies in South Korea

AU - Choi, Donghyun

AU - Kasdan, David Oliver

AU - Yoon, Dong Keun

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Increasing concern for climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction is driving the need for more accurate and sophisticated tools of analysis to protect populations. Standards of analysis that can normalize measurements under various contexts are particularly valuable in the global arena of disaster management. One concern that may benefit from normalizing is the analysis of disaster loss trends. Previous studies have used a combination of inflation, wealth, and societal factors in their normalization of disaster loss methodologies. This study examines the various normalization methods in previous research and applies a selection of eight formulae to 50 years of disaster data in South Korea. The results show both decreasing and increasing trends in disaster damage losses based on the methods, but there are curious biases under the results that may be artifacts of Korea's unique experiences in economic development. The conclusion discusses how the case of Korea may help to clarify the optimal normalization methodology for other countries.

AB - Increasing concern for climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction is driving the need for more accurate and sophisticated tools of analysis to protect populations. Standards of analysis that can normalize measurements under various contexts are particularly valuable in the global arena of disaster management. One concern that may benefit from normalizing is the analysis of disaster loss trends. Previous studies have used a combination of inflation, wealth, and societal factors in their normalization of disaster loss methodologies. This study examines the various normalization methods in previous research and applies a selection of eight formulae to 50 years of disaster data in South Korea. The results show both decreasing and increasing trends in disaster damage losses based on the methods, but there are curious biases under the results that may be artifacts of Korea's unique experiences in economic development. The conclusion discusses how the case of Korea may help to clarify the optimal normalization methodology for other countries.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054502105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054502105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/risa.13208

DO - 10.1111/risa.13208

M3 - Article

C2 - 30286528

AN - SCOPUS:85054502105

VL - 39

SP - 859

EP - 870

JO - Risk Analysis

JF - Risk Analysis

SN - 0272-4332

IS - 4

ER -