Another British world? Tamils, empire and mobility

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article addresses a need for refinement and greater conceptual clarity about non-white British identity in the British Empire and its aftermath, by focussing on the Tamils of Jaffna in northern Ceylon (Sri Lanka). Tamils from socially and intellectually elite backgrounds exemplify the nuances of a particular type of non-white ‘British’ identity, which are explored here as variously functional, ascribed, and emotional. ‘Functional’ refers to modes of identification in which Tamils attempted to call on a British moral and intellectual heritage in order to achieve political goals. By contrast, ‘ascribed’ denotes a Britishness that was imposed on Tamils by other colonial subjects as a result of their perceived affiliation with British authority and power. Finally, ‘emotional’ identification with Britishness refers to residual or outmoded forms of attachment to a shared imperial identity, which were expressed by Tamils in the aftermath of the British Empire. While Tamils never simply self-identified as ‘British’, this article considers how Tamils were able to define themselves - and were identified by others - as such. What emerges from this enquiry is a broader and more nuanced conception of Britishness, which centrally positions colonial transitions in the formation of post-colonial identities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)74-87
Number of pages14
JournalBritain and the World
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Mar 1

Fingerprint

Britishness
British Empire
Emotion
Colonies
Sri Lanka
Ceylon
Clarity
Authority
Heritage
Conception
Elites

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • History

Cite this

@article{6e22e79486f14bc6a8be5a8dd2526ee2,
title = "Another British world? Tamils, empire and mobility",
abstract = "This article addresses a need for refinement and greater conceptual clarity about non-white British identity in the British Empire and its aftermath, by focussing on the Tamils of Jaffna in northern Ceylon (Sri Lanka). Tamils from socially and intellectually elite backgrounds exemplify the nuances of a particular type of non-white ‘British’ identity, which are explored here as variously functional, ascribed, and emotional. ‘Functional’ refers to modes of identification in which Tamils attempted to call on a British moral and intellectual heritage in order to achieve political goals. By contrast, ‘ascribed’ denotes a Britishness that was imposed on Tamils by other colonial subjects as a result of their perceived affiliation with British authority and power. Finally, ‘emotional’ identification with Britishness refers to residual or outmoded forms of attachment to a shared imperial identity, which were expressed by Tamils in the aftermath of the British Empire. While Tamils never simply self-identified as ‘British’, this article considers how Tamils were able to define themselves - and were identified by others - as such. What emerges from this enquiry is a broader and more nuanced conception of Britishness, which centrally positions colonial transitions in the formation of post-colonial identities.",
author = "Ratnapalan, {Laavanyan Michael}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3366/brw.2017.0260",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "74--87",
journal = "Britain and the World",
issn = "2043-8567",
publisher = "Edinburgh University Press",
number = "1",

}

Another British world? Tamils, empire and mobility. / Ratnapalan, Laavanyan Michael.

In: Britain and the World, Vol. 10, No. 1, 01.03.2017, p. 74-87.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Another British world? Tamils, empire and mobility

AU - Ratnapalan, Laavanyan Michael

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - This article addresses a need for refinement and greater conceptual clarity about non-white British identity in the British Empire and its aftermath, by focussing on the Tamils of Jaffna in northern Ceylon (Sri Lanka). Tamils from socially and intellectually elite backgrounds exemplify the nuances of a particular type of non-white ‘British’ identity, which are explored here as variously functional, ascribed, and emotional. ‘Functional’ refers to modes of identification in which Tamils attempted to call on a British moral and intellectual heritage in order to achieve political goals. By contrast, ‘ascribed’ denotes a Britishness that was imposed on Tamils by other colonial subjects as a result of their perceived affiliation with British authority and power. Finally, ‘emotional’ identification with Britishness refers to residual or outmoded forms of attachment to a shared imperial identity, which were expressed by Tamils in the aftermath of the British Empire. While Tamils never simply self-identified as ‘British’, this article considers how Tamils were able to define themselves - and were identified by others - as such. What emerges from this enquiry is a broader and more nuanced conception of Britishness, which centrally positions colonial transitions in the formation of post-colonial identities.

AB - This article addresses a need for refinement and greater conceptual clarity about non-white British identity in the British Empire and its aftermath, by focussing on the Tamils of Jaffna in northern Ceylon (Sri Lanka). Tamils from socially and intellectually elite backgrounds exemplify the nuances of a particular type of non-white ‘British’ identity, which are explored here as variously functional, ascribed, and emotional. ‘Functional’ refers to modes of identification in which Tamils attempted to call on a British moral and intellectual heritage in order to achieve political goals. By contrast, ‘ascribed’ denotes a Britishness that was imposed on Tamils by other colonial subjects as a result of their perceived affiliation with British authority and power. Finally, ‘emotional’ identification with Britishness refers to residual or outmoded forms of attachment to a shared imperial identity, which were expressed by Tamils in the aftermath of the British Empire. While Tamils never simply self-identified as ‘British’, this article considers how Tamils were able to define themselves - and were identified by others - as such. What emerges from this enquiry is a broader and more nuanced conception of Britishness, which centrally positions colonial transitions in the formation of post-colonial identities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012117582&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85012117582&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3366/brw.2017.0260

DO - 10.3366/brw.2017.0260

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85012117582

VL - 10

SP - 74

EP - 87

JO - Britain and the World

JF - Britain and the World

SN - 2043-8567

IS - 1

ER -