Another weakness of "determinacy" as a selection criterion for rational expectations models

Seonghoon Cho; Bennett T. McCallum

doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2009.03.005

Another weakness of "determinacy" as a selection criterion for rational expectations models

Seonghoon Cho, Bennett T. McCallum

Department of Economics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper argues against determinacy as a guide to interpret rational expectations solutions, using an example in which a determinate solution exists but differs sharply in dynamic behavior from that implied by the model considered on a sector-by-sector basis.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	17-19
Number of pages	3
Journal	Economics Letters
Volume	104
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2009.03.005
Publication status	Published - 2009 Jul

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Finance
Economics and Econometrics

Access to Document

10.1016/j.econlet.2009.03.005

Cite this

@article{2da0cf66c8894b6f8391f6c7cc7f81ab,

title = "Another weakness of {"}determinacy{"} as a selection criterion for rational expectations models",

abstract = "This paper argues against determinacy as a guide to interpret rational expectations solutions, using an example in which a determinate solution exists but differs sharply in dynamic behavior from that implied by the model considered on a sector-by-sector basis.",

author = "Seonghoon Cho and McCallum, {Bennett T.}",

year = "2009",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1016/j.econlet.2009.03.005",

language = "English",

volume = "104",

pages = "17--19",

journal = "Economics Letters",

issn = "0165-1765",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Another weakness of "determinacy" as a selection criterion for rational expectations models

AU - Cho, Seonghoon

AU - McCallum, Bennett T.

PY - 2009/7

Y1 - 2009/7

N2 - This paper argues against determinacy as a guide to interpret rational expectations solutions, using an example in which a determinate solution exists but differs sharply in dynamic behavior from that implied by the model considered on a sector-by-sector basis.

AB - This paper argues against determinacy as a guide to interpret rational expectations solutions, using an example in which a determinate solution exists but differs sharply in dynamic behavior from that implied by the model considered on a sector-by-sector basis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67349160956&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67349160956&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.econlet.2009.03.005

DO - 10.1016/j.econlet.2009.03.005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:67349160956

VL - 104

SP - 17

EP - 19

JO - Economics Letters

JF - Economics Letters

SN - 0165-1765

IS - 1

ER -

Another weakness of "determinacy" as a selection criterion for rational expectations models

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this