Antecedents of convergence and divergence in strategic positioning: The effects of performance and aspiration on the direction of strategic change

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper investigates drivers of convergence and divergence in strategic positioning in terms of resource-allocation decisions. The study, based on the behavioral theory of the firm, suggests two unexplored kinked-curve relationships between performance gaps and strategic convergence-divergence. First, the study suggests a negative relationship between a focal firm's performance relative to aspiration levels and strategic convergence-divergence, where the slope is steeper when performance is above the aspiration level. Second, it suggests a positive relationship between a target firm's performance relative to a focal firm's performance and strategic convergence-divergence, where the slope is steeper when a target firm's performance is below a focal firm's performance. Empirical analysis of dyad-level data in the U.S. food processing industry reveals that the direction of a firm's strategic change is shaped by its aspiration level, its performance level, and the performance gap between it and the firm it selects as a model. This study contributes to the current literature by offering preliminary indications of when and how a firm moves closer to or further away from other competing firms in its strategic position.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)386-402
Number of pages17
JournalOrganization Science
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007 May 1

Fingerprint

Food processing
Resource allocation
Industry
Strategic positioning
Aspiration
Strategic change
Divergence
Firm performance
Aspiration Level

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Strategy and Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

@article{5a6543727ae74cafbb1fdb18c1600209,
title = "Antecedents of convergence and divergence in strategic positioning: The effects of performance and aspiration on the direction of strategic change",
abstract = "This paper investigates drivers of convergence and divergence in strategic positioning in terms of resource-allocation decisions. The study, based on the behavioral theory of the firm, suggests two unexplored kinked-curve relationships between performance gaps and strategic convergence-divergence. First, the study suggests a negative relationship between a focal firm's performance relative to aspiration levels and strategic convergence-divergence, where the slope is steeper when performance is above the aspiration level. Second, it suggests a positive relationship between a target firm's performance relative to a focal firm's performance and strategic convergence-divergence, where the slope is steeper when a target firm's performance is below a focal firm's performance. Empirical analysis of dyad-level data in the U.S. food processing industry reveals that the direction of a firm's strategic change is shaped by its aspiration level, its performance level, and the performance gap between it and the firm it selects as a model. This study contributes to the current literature by offering preliminary indications of when and how a firm moves closer to or further away from other competing firms in its strategic position.",
author = "Park, {Kyung Min}",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1287/orsc.1060.0240",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "386--402",
journal = "Organization Science",
issn = "1047-7039",
publisher = "INFORMS Inst.for Operations Res.and the Management Sciences",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Antecedents of convergence and divergence in strategic positioning

T2 - The effects of performance and aspiration on the direction of strategic change

AU - Park, Kyung Min

PY - 2007/5/1

Y1 - 2007/5/1

N2 - This paper investigates drivers of convergence and divergence in strategic positioning in terms of resource-allocation decisions. The study, based on the behavioral theory of the firm, suggests two unexplored kinked-curve relationships between performance gaps and strategic convergence-divergence. First, the study suggests a negative relationship between a focal firm's performance relative to aspiration levels and strategic convergence-divergence, where the slope is steeper when performance is above the aspiration level. Second, it suggests a positive relationship between a target firm's performance relative to a focal firm's performance and strategic convergence-divergence, where the slope is steeper when a target firm's performance is below a focal firm's performance. Empirical analysis of dyad-level data in the U.S. food processing industry reveals that the direction of a firm's strategic change is shaped by its aspiration level, its performance level, and the performance gap between it and the firm it selects as a model. This study contributes to the current literature by offering preliminary indications of when and how a firm moves closer to or further away from other competing firms in its strategic position.

AB - This paper investigates drivers of convergence and divergence in strategic positioning in terms of resource-allocation decisions. The study, based on the behavioral theory of the firm, suggests two unexplored kinked-curve relationships between performance gaps and strategic convergence-divergence. First, the study suggests a negative relationship between a focal firm's performance relative to aspiration levels and strategic convergence-divergence, where the slope is steeper when performance is above the aspiration level. Second, it suggests a positive relationship between a target firm's performance relative to a focal firm's performance and strategic convergence-divergence, where the slope is steeper when a target firm's performance is below a focal firm's performance. Empirical analysis of dyad-level data in the U.S. food processing industry reveals that the direction of a firm's strategic change is shaped by its aspiration level, its performance level, and the performance gap between it and the firm it selects as a model. This study contributes to the current literature by offering preliminary indications of when and how a firm moves closer to or further away from other competing firms in its strategic position.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=55949114426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=55949114426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1287/orsc.1060.0240

DO - 10.1287/orsc.1060.0240

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:55949114426

VL - 18

SP - 386

EP - 402

JO - Organization Science

JF - Organization Science

SN - 1047-7039

IS - 3

ER -