Are the effects of Bloom's uncertainty shocks robust?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper shows that "wait-and-see" dynamics of uncertainty shocks in Bloom (2009) are not necessarily robust over time. Bloom (2009) shows that uncertainty shocks, identified by spikes in stock market volatility from 1962 to 2008, trigger immediate falls in output and employment followed by rapid rebounds after the resolution of uncertainty. This paper finds that if one splits the sample into two sub-samples these findings hold only for the period between 1962 and 1982. Stock market volatility shocks failed to produce "wait-and-see" dynamics after 1983.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)216-220
Number of pages5
JournalEconomics Letters
Volume119
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 May 1

Fingerprint

Uncertainty
Stock market volatility
Rebound
Trigger

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

@article{a1529ae0c22a4ba8b914cdbdf177fd4c,
title = "Are the effects of Bloom's uncertainty shocks robust?",
abstract = "This paper shows that {"}wait-and-see{"} dynamics of uncertainty shocks in Bloom (2009) are not necessarily robust over time. Bloom (2009) shows that uncertainty shocks, identified by spikes in stock market volatility from 1962 to 2008, trigger immediate falls in output and employment followed by rapid rebounds after the resolution of uncertainty. This paper finds that if one splits the sample into two sub-samples these findings hold only for the period between 1962 and 1982. Stock market volatility shocks failed to produce {"}wait-and-see{"} dynamics after 1983.",
author = "Sangyup Choi",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.econlet.2013.02.015",
language = "English",
volume = "119",
pages = "216--220",
journal = "Economics Letters",
issn = "0165-1765",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

Are the effects of Bloom's uncertainty shocks robust? / Choi, Sangyup.

In: Economics Letters, Vol. 119, No. 2, 01.05.2013, p. 216-220.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are the effects of Bloom's uncertainty shocks robust?

AU - Choi, Sangyup

PY - 2013/5/1

Y1 - 2013/5/1

N2 - This paper shows that "wait-and-see" dynamics of uncertainty shocks in Bloom (2009) are not necessarily robust over time. Bloom (2009) shows that uncertainty shocks, identified by spikes in stock market volatility from 1962 to 2008, trigger immediate falls in output and employment followed by rapid rebounds after the resolution of uncertainty. This paper finds that if one splits the sample into two sub-samples these findings hold only for the period between 1962 and 1982. Stock market volatility shocks failed to produce "wait-and-see" dynamics after 1983.

AB - This paper shows that "wait-and-see" dynamics of uncertainty shocks in Bloom (2009) are not necessarily robust over time. Bloom (2009) shows that uncertainty shocks, identified by spikes in stock market volatility from 1962 to 2008, trigger immediate falls in output and employment followed by rapid rebounds after the resolution of uncertainty. This paper finds that if one splits the sample into two sub-samples these findings hold only for the period between 1962 and 1982. Stock market volatility shocks failed to produce "wait-and-see" dynamics after 1983.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875583639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875583639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.econlet.2013.02.015

DO - 10.1016/j.econlet.2013.02.015

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84875583639

VL - 119

SP - 216

EP - 220

JO - Economics Letters

JF - Economics Letters

SN - 0165-1765

IS - 2

ER -