Assessing the factors influencing continuous quality improvement implementation: Experience in Korean hospitals

Sunhee Lee, Kui Son Choi, Hye Young Kang, Woohyun Cho, Yoo M.I. Chae

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To assess the extent of continuous quality improvement (CQI) implementation in Korean hospitals and to identify its influencing factors. Design. Cross-sectional study by mailed questionnaire survey. Study participants. One hundred and seventeen staff members with responsibility for CQ1 at 67 hospitals with ≥ 400 beds. Main outcome measures. The degree of CQI implementation was measured using the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Criteria (MBNQAC). Factors related to the degree of CQI implementation were the four components of the CQI pyramid, namely the cultural, technical, strategic, and structural attributes of individual hospitals. Results. The average CQI implementation score across the seven dimensions by MBNQAC was 3.34 on a 5-point scale. The highest score was achieved in the dimension of 'customer satisfaction' (3.88), followed by 'information/analysis' (3.59), and 'quality management' (3.35). Regression analysis showed that hospitals which better fulfilled technical requirements, such as improving information systems (P<0.05), using more scientific CQI tools, and adopting systematic problem-solving approaches (P<0.01), tended to achieve higher degrees of CQI implementation. Although statistically insignificant, positive trends were observed for group/developmental culture and the degree of employee empowerment, and the use of prospective strategy. Conclusion. It appears that the most important contributing factors to active CQI implementation in Korean hospitals were the use of scientific skills in decision-making and the adoption of a quality information system capable of producing precise and valid information.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)383-391
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care
Volume14
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002 Oct 1

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
Information Systems
Decision Making
Cross-Sectional Studies
Regression Analysis
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{316afbb788b441c8977086e313811dd6,
title = "Assessing the factors influencing continuous quality improvement implementation: Experience in Korean hospitals",
abstract = "Objective. To assess the extent of continuous quality improvement (CQI) implementation in Korean hospitals and to identify its influencing factors. Design. Cross-sectional study by mailed questionnaire survey. Study participants. One hundred and seventeen staff members with responsibility for CQ1 at 67 hospitals with ≥ 400 beds. Main outcome measures. The degree of CQI implementation was measured using the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Criteria (MBNQAC). Factors related to the degree of CQI implementation were the four components of the CQI pyramid, namely the cultural, technical, strategic, and structural attributes of individual hospitals. Results. The average CQI implementation score across the seven dimensions by MBNQAC was 3.34 on a 5-point scale. The highest score was achieved in the dimension of 'customer satisfaction' (3.88), followed by 'information/analysis' (3.59), and 'quality management' (3.35). Regression analysis showed that hospitals which better fulfilled technical requirements, such as improving information systems (P<0.05), using more scientific CQI tools, and adopting systematic problem-solving approaches (P<0.01), tended to achieve higher degrees of CQI implementation. Although statistically insignificant, positive trends were observed for group/developmental culture and the degree of employee empowerment, and the use of prospective strategy. Conclusion. It appears that the most important contributing factors to active CQI implementation in Korean hospitals were the use of scientific skills in decision-making and the adoption of a quality information system capable of producing precise and valid information.",
author = "Sunhee Lee and Choi, {Kui Son} and Kang, {Hye Young} and Woohyun Cho and Chae, {Yoo M.I.}",
year = "2002",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/intqhc/14.5.383",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "383--391",
journal = "International Journal for Quality in Health Care",
issn = "1353-4505",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "5",

}

Assessing the factors influencing continuous quality improvement implementation : Experience in Korean hospitals. / Lee, Sunhee; Choi, Kui Son; Kang, Hye Young; Cho, Woohyun; Chae, Yoo M.I.

In: International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Vol. 14, No. 5, 01.10.2002, p. 383-391.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the factors influencing continuous quality improvement implementation

T2 - Experience in Korean hospitals

AU - Lee, Sunhee

AU - Choi, Kui Son

AU - Kang, Hye Young

AU - Cho, Woohyun

AU - Chae, Yoo M.I.

PY - 2002/10/1

Y1 - 2002/10/1

N2 - Objective. To assess the extent of continuous quality improvement (CQI) implementation in Korean hospitals and to identify its influencing factors. Design. Cross-sectional study by mailed questionnaire survey. Study participants. One hundred and seventeen staff members with responsibility for CQ1 at 67 hospitals with ≥ 400 beds. Main outcome measures. The degree of CQI implementation was measured using the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Criteria (MBNQAC). Factors related to the degree of CQI implementation were the four components of the CQI pyramid, namely the cultural, technical, strategic, and structural attributes of individual hospitals. Results. The average CQI implementation score across the seven dimensions by MBNQAC was 3.34 on a 5-point scale. The highest score was achieved in the dimension of 'customer satisfaction' (3.88), followed by 'information/analysis' (3.59), and 'quality management' (3.35). Regression analysis showed that hospitals which better fulfilled technical requirements, such as improving information systems (P<0.05), using more scientific CQI tools, and adopting systematic problem-solving approaches (P<0.01), tended to achieve higher degrees of CQI implementation. Although statistically insignificant, positive trends were observed for group/developmental culture and the degree of employee empowerment, and the use of prospective strategy. Conclusion. It appears that the most important contributing factors to active CQI implementation in Korean hospitals were the use of scientific skills in decision-making and the adoption of a quality information system capable of producing precise and valid information.

AB - Objective. To assess the extent of continuous quality improvement (CQI) implementation in Korean hospitals and to identify its influencing factors. Design. Cross-sectional study by mailed questionnaire survey. Study participants. One hundred and seventeen staff members with responsibility for CQ1 at 67 hospitals with ≥ 400 beds. Main outcome measures. The degree of CQI implementation was measured using the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Criteria (MBNQAC). Factors related to the degree of CQI implementation were the four components of the CQI pyramid, namely the cultural, technical, strategic, and structural attributes of individual hospitals. Results. The average CQI implementation score across the seven dimensions by MBNQAC was 3.34 on a 5-point scale. The highest score was achieved in the dimension of 'customer satisfaction' (3.88), followed by 'information/analysis' (3.59), and 'quality management' (3.35). Regression analysis showed that hospitals which better fulfilled technical requirements, such as improving information systems (P<0.05), using more scientific CQI tools, and adopting systematic problem-solving approaches (P<0.01), tended to achieve higher degrees of CQI implementation. Although statistically insignificant, positive trends were observed for group/developmental culture and the degree of employee empowerment, and the use of prospective strategy. Conclusion. It appears that the most important contributing factors to active CQI implementation in Korean hospitals were the use of scientific skills in decision-making and the adoption of a quality information system capable of producing precise and valid information.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036797922&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036797922&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/intqhc/14.5.383

DO - 10.1093/intqhc/14.5.383

M3 - Article

C2 - 12389804

AN - SCOPUS:0036797922

VL - 14

SP - 383

EP - 391

JO - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

JF - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

SN - 1353-4505

IS - 5

ER -