Assessment of laparoscopic stomach preserving surgery with sentinel basin dissection versus standard gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy in early gastric cancer-A multicenter randomized phase III clinical trial (SENORITA trial) protocol

Ji Yeon Park, Young Woo Kim, Keun Won Ryu, Byung Ho Nam, Young Joon Lee, Sang Ho Jeong, Ji Ho Park, Hoon Hur, Sang Uk Han, Jae Seok Min, Ji Yeong An, Woo Jin Hyung, Gyu Seok Cho, Gui Ae Jeong, Oh Jeong, Young Kyu Park, Mi Ran Jung, Hong Man Yoon, Bang Wool Eom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Along with the marked increase in early gastric cancer (EGC) in the Eastern countries, there has been an effort to adopt the sentinel node concept in EGC to preserve gastric function and reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications. Based on promising results from a previous quality control study, this prospective multicenter randomized controlled phase III clinical trial aims to elucidate the oncologic safety of laparoscopic stomach-preserving surgery with sentinel basin dissection (SBD) compared to a standard laparoscopic gastrectomy. Methods/Design: This trial is an investigator-initiated, open-label, multicenter randomized controlled phase III trial with a non-inferiority design. Patients diagnosed with a single lesion of clinical stage T1N0M0 gastric adenocarcinoma, with a diameter of 3 cm or less are eligible for the present study. A total of 580 patients (290 per group) will be randomized to either laparoscopic stomach-preserving surgery with SBD or standard surgery. The primary end-point is 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and the secondary endpoints include postoperative morbidity and mortality, quality of life, 5-year DFS, and overall survival. Qualified investigators who completed the prior quality control study are exclusively allowed to participate in this phase III clinical trial. Discussion: The proposed trial is expected to verify whether laparoscopic stomach-preserving surgery with SBD achieves similar oncologic outcomes and improved quality of life compared to a standard gastrectomy in EGC patients. Trial registration: This study was registered at the NIH ClinicalTrial.gov database ( NCT01804998 ) on March 4th, 2013.

Original languageEnglish
Article number340
JournalBMC cancer
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 May 31

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Genetics
  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of laparoscopic stomach preserving surgery with sentinel basin dissection versus standard gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy in early gastric cancer-A multicenter randomized phase III clinical trial (SENORITA trial) protocol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Park, J. Y., Kim, Y. W., Ryu, K. W., Nam, B. H., Lee, Y. J., Jeong, S. H., Park, J. H., Hur, H., Han, S. U., Min, J. S., An, J. Y., Hyung, W. J., Cho, G. S., Jeong, G. A., Jeong, O., Park, Y. K., Jung, M. R., Yoon, H. M., & Eom, B. W. (2016). Assessment of laparoscopic stomach preserving surgery with sentinel basin dissection versus standard gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy in early gastric cancer-A multicenter randomized phase III clinical trial (SENORITA trial) protocol. BMC cancer, 16(1), [340]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2336-8