Association between dental implants in the posterior region and traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars: A long-term follow-up clinical and radiographic analysis

Jae Hong Lee, Helen Hye In Kweon, Seong Ho Choi, Young Taek Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the association between dental implants in the posterior region and traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars, using data collected during from 2002 to 2015. Methods: Traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars was assessed by examining clinical parameters (bleeding on probing, probing pocket depth, fremitus, and tooth mobility) and radiographic parameters (loss of supporting bone and widening of the periodontal ligament space) over a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clinical factors (gender, age, implant type, maxillary or mandibular position, opposing teeth, and duration of functional loading) were evaluated statistically in order to characterize the relationship between implants in the posterior region and traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars. Results: The study inclusion criteria were met by 283 patients, who had received 347 implants in the posterior region. The incidence of traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars was significantly higher for splinted implants (P=0.004), implants in the maxillary region (P<0.001), and when implants were present in the opposing teeth (P<0.001). The other clinical factors of gender, age, and duration of functional loading were not significantly associated with traumatic occlusion. Conclusions: This study found that the risk of traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars increased when splinted implants were placed in the maxillary molar region and when the teeth opposing an implant also contained implants.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)396-404
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Periodontal and Implant Science
Volume46
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Dental Implants
Bicuspid
Tooth
Age Factors
Tooth Mobility
Periodontal Ligament
Retrospective Studies
Hemorrhage
Bone and Bones
Incidence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oral Surgery
  • Periodontics

Cite this

@article{dba341e7ad894b4bb2ffd39bc49944eb,
title = "Association between dental implants in the posterior region and traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars: A long-term follow-up clinical and radiographic analysis",
abstract = "Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the association between dental implants in the posterior region and traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars, using data collected during from 2002 to 2015. Methods: Traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars was assessed by examining clinical parameters (bleeding on probing, probing pocket depth, fremitus, and tooth mobility) and radiographic parameters (loss of supporting bone and widening of the periodontal ligament space) over a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clinical factors (gender, age, implant type, maxillary or mandibular position, opposing teeth, and duration of functional loading) were evaluated statistically in order to characterize the relationship between implants in the posterior region and traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars. Results: The study inclusion criteria were met by 283 patients, who had received 347 implants in the posterior region. The incidence of traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars was significantly higher for splinted implants (P=0.004), implants in the maxillary region (P<0.001), and when implants were present in the opposing teeth (P<0.001). The other clinical factors of gender, age, and duration of functional loading were not significantly associated with traumatic occlusion. Conclusions: This study found that the risk of traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars increased when splinted implants were placed in the maxillary molar region and when the teeth opposing an implant also contained implants.",
author = "Lee, {Jae Hong} and Kweon, {Helen Hye In} and Choi, {Seong Ho} and Kim, {Young Taek}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5051/jpis.2016.46.6.396",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "396--404",
journal = "Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science",
issn = "2093-2278",
publisher = "Korean Academy of Periodontology",
number = "6",

}

Association between dental implants in the posterior region and traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars : A long-term follow-up clinical and radiographic analysis. / Lee, Jae Hong; Kweon, Helen Hye In; Choi, Seong Ho; Kim, Young Taek.

In: Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science, Vol. 46, No. 6, 01.01.2016, p. 396-404.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Association between dental implants in the posterior region and traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars

T2 - A long-term follow-up clinical and radiographic analysis

AU - Lee, Jae Hong

AU - Kweon, Helen Hye In

AU - Choi, Seong Ho

AU - Kim, Young Taek

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the association between dental implants in the posterior region and traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars, using data collected during from 2002 to 2015. Methods: Traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars was assessed by examining clinical parameters (bleeding on probing, probing pocket depth, fremitus, and tooth mobility) and radiographic parameters (loss of supporting bone and widening of the periodontal ligament space) over a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clinical factors (gender, age, implant type, maxillary or mandibular position, opposing teeth, and duration of functional loading) were evaluated statistically in order to characterize the relationship between implants in the posterior region and traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars. Results: The study inclusion criteria were met by 283 patients, who had received 347 implants in the posterior region. The incidence of traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars was significantly higher for splinted implants (P=0.004), implants in the maxillary region (P<0.001), and when implants were present in the opposing teeth (P<0.001). The other clinical factors of gender, age, and duration of functional loading were not significantly associated with traumatic occlusion. Conclusions: This study found that the risk of traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars increased when splinted implants were placed in the maxillary molar region and when the teeth opposing an implant also contained implants.

AB - Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the association between dental implants in the posterior region and traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars, using data collected during from 2002 to 2015. Methods: Traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars was assessed by examining clinical parameters (bleeding on probing, probing pocket depth, fremitus, and tooth mobility) and radiographic parameters (loss of supporting bone and widening of the periodontal ligament space) over a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clinical factors (gender, age, implant type, maxillary or mandibular position, opposing teeth, and duration of functional loading) were evaluated statistically in order to characterize the relationship between implants in the posterior region and traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars. Results: The study inclusion criteria were met by 283 patients, who had received 347 implants in the posterior region. The incidence of traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars was significantly higher for splinted implants (P=0.004), implants in the maxillary region (P<0.001), and when implants were present in the opposing teeth (P<0.001). The other clinical factors of gender, age, and duration of functional loading were not significantly associated with traumatic occlusion. Conclusions: This study found that the risk of traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars increased when splinted implants were placed in the maxillary molar region and when the teeth opposing an implant also contained implants.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009465880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009465880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5051/jpis.2016.46.6.396

DO - 10.5051/jpis.2016.46.6.396

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85009465880

VL - 46

SP - 396

EP - 404

JO - Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

JF - Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

SN - 2093-2278

IS - 6

ER -