Asymmetry of power and attention in alliance politics: the US–Republic of Korea case

Gi Wook Shin, Hilary Izatt, Rennie J. Moon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

ABSTRACT: While power asymmetry typically defines security relationships between allies, there exist other forms of asymmetry that influence alliance politics. In order to illustrate how they can shape policy outcomes that cannot be explained solely through the lens of power capabilities, the authors examine the role of relative attention that each side pays to the alliance. It is their central argument that since the client state has a greater vested interest in the alliance and given that attention depends on interest/need, the client state can leverage attention to get its way. By analysing two specific cases, the 2002 South Korean schoolgirls tragedy and the 2008 beef protests—instances where the South Koreans succeeded in compelling US concessions—the authors show that because the alliance was more central to the client state's agendas, there existed an asymmetry of attention that offered leveraging opportunities for the weaker ally. In this study, the authors emphasise the role of media attention as a key variable, and seek to contribute to debates on weaker party leverage in asymmetrical alliances.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)235-255
Number of pages21
JournalAustralian Journal of International Affairs
Volume70
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 May 3

Fingerprint

asymmetry
Korea
politics
allies
need
policy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{03be9a134c7a44d983ce5a73f6595a74,
title = "Asymmetry of power and attention in alliance politics: the US–Republic of Korea case",
abstract = "ABSTRACT: While power asymmetry typically defines security relationships between allies, there exist other forms of asymmetry that influence alliance politics. In order to illustrate how they can shape policy outcomes that cannot be explained solely through the lens of power capabilities, the authors examine the role of relative attention that each side pays to the alliance. It is their central argument that since the client state has a greater vested interest in the alliance and given that attention depends on interest/need, the client state can leverage attention to get its way. By analysing two specific cases, the 2002 South Korean schoolgirls tragedy and the 2008 beef protests—instances where the South Koreans succeeded in compelling US concessions—the authors show that because the alliance was more central to the client state's agendas, there existed an asymmetry of attention that offered leveraging opportunities for the weaker ally. In this study, the authors emphasise the role of media attention as a key variable, and seek to contribute to debates on weaker party leverage in asymmetrical alliances.",
author = "Shin, {Gi Wook} and Hilary Izatt and Moon, {Rennie J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/10357718.2015.1113228",
language = "English",
volume = "70",
pages = "235--255",
journal = "Australian Journal of International Affairs",
issn = "1035-7718",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Asymmetry of power and attention in alliance politics : the US–Republic of Korea case. / Shin, Gi Wook; Izatt, Hilary; Moon, Rennie J.

In: Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 70, No. 3, 03.05.2016, p. 235-255.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Asymmetry of power and attention in alliance politics

T2 - the US–Republic of Korea case

AU - Shin, Gi Wook

AU - Izatt, Hilary

AU - Moon, Rennie J.

PY - 2016/5/3

Y1 - 2016/5/3

N2 - ABSTRACT: While power asymmetry typically defines security relationships between allies, there exist other forms of asymmetry that influence alliance politics. In order to illustrate how they can shape policy outcomes that cannot be explained solely through the lens of power capabilities, the authors examine the role of relative attention that each side pays to the alliance. It is their central argument that since the client state has a greater vested interest in the alliance and given that attention depends on interest/need, the client state can leverage attention to get its way. By analysing two specific cases, the 2002 South Korean schoolgirls tragedy and the 2008 beef protests—instances where the South Koreans succeeded in compelling US concessions—the authors show that because the alliance was more central to the client state's agendas, there existed an asymmetry of attention that offered leveraging opportunities for the weaker ally. In this study, the authors emphasise the role of media attention as a key variable, and seek to contribute to debates on weaker party leverage in asymmetrical alliances.

AB - ABSTRACT: While power asymmetry typically defines security relationships between allies, there exist other forms of asymmetry that influence alliance politics. In order to illustrate how they can shape policy outcomes that cannot be explained solely through the lens of power capabilities, the authors examine the role of relative attention that each side pays to the alliance. It is their central argument that since the client state has a greater vested interest in the alliance and given that attention depends on interest/need, the client state can leverage attention to get its way. By analysing two specific cases, the 2002 South Korean schoolgirls tragedy and the 2008 beef protests—instances where the South Koreans succeeded in compelling US concessions—the authors show that because the alliance was more central to the client state's agendas, there existed an asymmetry of attention that offered leveraging opportunities for the weaker ally. In this study, the authors emphasise the role of media attention as a key variable, and seek to contribute to debates on weaker party leverage in asymmetrical alliances.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958550187&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958550187&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10357718.2015.1113228

DO - 10.1080/10357718.2015.1113228

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84958550187

VL - 70

SP - 235

EP - 255

JO - Australian Journal of International Affairs

JF - Australian Journal of International Affairs

SN - 1035-7718

IS - 3

ER -