Author credit-assignment schemas

A comparison and analysis

Jian Xu, Ying Ding, Min Song, Tamy Chambers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Credit assignment to multiple authors of a publication is a challenging task owing to the conventions followed within different areas of research. In this study, we present a review of different author credit-assignment schemas, which are designed mainly based on author position and the total number of coauthors on the publication. We implemented, tested, and classified 15 author credit-assignment schemas into 3 types: linear, curve, and “other” assignment schemas. Further investigation and analysis revealed that most of the methods provide reasonable credit-assignment results, even though the credit-assignment distribution approaches are quite different among different types. The evaluation of each schema based on PubMed articles published in 2013 shows that there exist positive correlations among different schemas and that the similarity of credit-assignment distributions can be derived from the similar design principles that stress the number of coauthors or the author position, or consider both. We provide a summary about the features of each credit-assignment schema to facilitate the selection of the appropriate one, depending on the different conditions required to meet diverse needs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1973-1989
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Volume67
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Aug 1

Fingerprint

credit
Assignment
Credit
evaluation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Information Systems
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

@article{ee23027a6e454e939c6ae5f803f86984,
title = "Author credit-assignment schemas: A comparison and analysis",
abstract = "Credit assignment to multiple authors of a publication is a challenging task owing to the conventions followed within different areas of research. In this study, we present a review of different author credit-assignment schemas, which are designed mainly based on author position and the total number of coauthors on the publication. We implemented, tested, and classified 15 author credit-assignment schemas into 3 types: linear, curve, and “other” assignment schemas. Further investigation and analysis revealed that most of the methods provide reasonable credit-assignment results, even though the credit-assignment distribution approaches are quite different among different types. The evaluation of each schema based on PubMed articles published in 2013 shows that there exist positive correlations among different schemas and that the similarity of credit-assignment distributions can be derived from the similar design principles that stress the number of coauthors or the author position, or consider both. We provide a summary about the features of each credit-assignment schema to facilitate the selection of the appropriate one, depending on the different conditions required to meet diverse needs.",
author = "Jian Xu and Ying Ding and Min Song and Tamy Chambers",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/asi.23495",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "1973--1989",
journal = "Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology",
issn = "2330-1635",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "8",

}

Author credit-assignment schemas : A comparison and analysis. / Xu, Jian; Ding, Ying; Song, Min; Chambers, Tamy.

In: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 67, No. 8, 01.08.2016, p. 1973-1989.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Author credit-assignment schemas

T2 - A comparison and analysis

AU - Xu, Jian

AU - Ding, Ying

AU - Song, Min

AU - Chambers, Tamy

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - Credit assignment to multiple authors of a publication is a challenging task owing to the conventions followed within different areas of research. In this study, we present a review of different author credit-assignment schemas, which are designed mainly based on author position and the total number of coauthors on the publication. We implemented, tested, and classified 15 author credit-assignment schemas into 3 types: linear, curve, and “other” assignment schemas. Further investigation and analysis revealed that most of the methods provide reasonable credit-assignment results, even though the credit-assignment distribution approaches are quite different among different types. The evaluation of each schema based on PubMed articles published in 2013 shows that there exist positive correlations among different schemas and that the similarity of credit-assignment distributions can be derived from the similar design principles that stress the number of coauthors or the author position, or consider both. We provide a summary about the features of each credit-assignment schema to facilitate the selection of the appropriate one, depending on the different conditions required to meet diverse needs.

AB - Credit assignment to multiple authors of a publication is a challenging task owing to the conventions followed within different areas of research. In this study, we present a review of different author credit-assignment schemas, which are designed mainly based on author position and the total number of coauthors on the publication. We implemented, tested, and classified 15 author credit-assignment schemas into 3 types: linear, curve, and “other” assignment schemas. Further investigation and analysis revealed that most of the methods provide reasonable credit-assignment results, even though the credit-assignment distribution approaches are quite different among different types. The evaluation of each schema based on PubMed articles published in 2013 shows that there exist positive correlations among different schemas and that the similarity of credit-assignment distributions can be derived from the similar design principles that stress the number of coauthors or the author position, or consider both. We provide a summary about the features of each credit-assignment schema to facilitate the selection of the appropriate one, depending on the different conditions required to meet diverse needs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979082308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979082308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/asi.23495

DO - 10.1002/asi.23495

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 1973

EP - 1989

JO - Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

JF - Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

SN - 2330-1635

IS - 8

ER -