Authoritarianism and humanitarian aid: Regime stability and external relief in China and Myanmar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Severe natural disasters encourage the international community to donate humanitarian aid (materials and personnel) to the affected country, which is critical for its human security. Some authoritarian regimes, however, rationally reject such aid despite the dire situation of their people. When an authoritarian regime decides whether to accept foreign humanitarian aid for severe natural disasters or not, it considers two political factors: (1) the risk and (2) the need to accept aid, which is a type of exogenous shock that may threaten the stability of the regime and its survival. This paper considers the factors of risk (regime type, domestic struggle, and international pressure) as inherent and contingent determinants of regime stability, and the need factors by looking at the different types of sources from which the regime gains its legitimacy (electoral mandate, economic development, or ideology). If the risk is less and the need is more, the regime is more likely to accept the aid, otherwise not. The two authoritarian regimes hit by severe natural disasters - the 2008 Sichuan earthquake in China and the 2008 Cyclone Nargis-caused floods in Myanmar - are considered as salient cases for the external variation between authoritarian regimes. This paper also finds some critical internal variation within an authoritarian regime and its differing responses during the 2008 Sichuan earthquake and two other disasters - the 1976 Tangshan earthquake and the 2010 Qinghai earthquake.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)439-462
Number of pages24
JournalPacific Review
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Sep 1

Fingerprint

humanitarian aid
authoritarianism
Myanmar
natural disaster
Sichuan earthquake 2008
aid
relief
regime
Cyclone Nargis 2008
China
Tangshan earthquake 1976
ideology
disaster
economic development
earthquake
human security
political factors
need
personnel
legitimacy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{ca5e78ce58724331a7ad99b2e4403af0,
title = "Authoritarianism and humanitarian aid: Regime stability and external relief in China and Myanmar",
abstract = "Severe natural disasters encourage the international community to donate humanitarian aid (materials and personnel) to the affected country, which is critical for its human security. Some authoritarian regimes, however, rationally reject such aid despite the dire situation of their people. When an authoritarian regime decides whether to accept foreign humanitarian aid for severe natural disasters or not, it considers two political factors: (1) the risk and (2) the need to accept aid, which is a type of exogenous shock that may threaten the stability of the regime and its survival. This paper considers the factors of risk (regime type, domestic struggle, and international pressure) as inherent and contingent determinants of regime stability, and the need factors by looking at the different types of sources from which the regime gains its legitimacy (electoral mandate, economic development, or ideology). If the risk is less and the need is more, the regime is more likely to accept the aid, otherwise not. The two authoritarian regimes hit by severe natural disasters - the 2008 Sichuan earthquake in China and the 2008 Cyclone Nargis-caused floods in Myanmar - are considered as salient cases for the external variation between authoritarian regimes. This paper also finds some critical internal variation within an authoritarian regime and its differing responses during the 2008 Sichuan earthquake and two other disasters - the 1976 Tangshan earthquake and the 2010 Qinghai earthquake.",
author = "Wooyeal Paik",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09512748.2011.596560",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "439--462",
journal = "Pacific Review",
issn = "0951-2748",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Authoritarianism and humanitarian aid : Regime stability and external relief in China and Myanmar. / Paik, Wooyeal.

In: Pacific Review, Vol. 24, No. 4, 01.09.2011, p. 439-462.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Authoritarianism and humanitarian aid

T2 - Regime stability and external relief in China and Myanmar

AU - Paik, Wooyeal

PY - 2011/9/1

Y1 - 2011/9/1

N2 - Severe natural disasters encourage the international community to donate humanitarian aid (materials and personnel) to the affected country, which is critical for its human security. Some authoritarian regimes, however, rationally reject such aid despite the dire situation of their people. When an authoritarian regime decides whether to accept foreign humanitarian aid for severe natural disasters or not, it considers two political factors: (1) the risk and (2) the need to accept aid, which is a type of exogenous shock that may threaten the stability of the regime and its survival. This paper considers the factors of risk (regime type, domestic struggle, and international pressure) as inherent and contingent determinants of regime stability, and the need factors by looking at the different types of sources from which the regime gains its legitimacy (electoral mandate, economic development, or ideology). If the risk is less and the need is more, the regime is more likely to accept the aid, otherwise not. The two authoritarian regimes hit by severe natural disasters - the 2008 Sichuan earthquake in China and the 2008 Cyclone Nargis-caused floods in Myanmar - are considered as salient cases for the external variation between authoritarian regimes. This paper also finds some critical internal variation within an authoritarian regime and its differing responses during the 2008 Sichuan earthquake and two other disasters - the 1976 Tangshan earthquake and the 2010 Qinghai earthquake.

AB - Severe natural disasters encourage the international community to donate humanitarian aid (materials and personnel) to the affected country, which is critical for its human security. Some authoritarian regimes, however, rationally reject such aid despite the dire situation of their people. When an authoritarian regime decides whether to accept foreign humanitarian aid for severe natural disasters or not, it considers two political factors: (1) the risk and (2) the need to accept aid, which is a type of exogenous shock that may threaten the stability of the regime and its survival. This paper considers the factors of risk (regime type, domestic struggle, and international pressure) as inherent and contingent determinants of regime stability, and the need factors by looking at the different types of sources from which the regime gains its legitimacy (electoral mandate, economic development, or ideology). If the risk is less and the need is more, the regime is more likely to accept the aid, otherwise not. The two authoritarian regimes hit by severe natural disasters - the 2008 Sichuan earthquake in China and the 2008 Cyclone Nargis-caused floods in Myanmar - are considered as salient cases for the external variation between authoritarian regimes. This paper also finds some critical internal variation within an authoritarian regime and its differing responses during the 2008 Sichuan earthquake and two other disasters - the 1976 Tangshan earthquake and the 2010 Qinghai earthquake.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860416271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860416271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09512748.2011.596560

DO - 10.1080/09512748.2011.596560

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84860416271

VL - 24

SP - 439

EP - 462

JO - Pacific Review

JF - Pacific Review

SN - 0951-2748

IS - 4

ER -