Automated Pressure-Controlled Discography in Patients Undergoing Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Discogenic Back Pain

Chang Kyu Lee, DongAh Shin, Hyoung Ihl Kim, Seong Yi, Yoon Ha, Keung Nyun Kim, Do Heum Yoon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with or without automated pressure-controlled discography (APCD) before the procedure. Methods Patients (n = 36) who underwent ALIF for lumbar discogenic back pain between 2008 and 2013 and were followed for more than 6 months were enrolled in this study. APCD was performed to identify discogenic back pain. Preoperative x-rays, computed tomography images, and magnetic resonance images were obtained. The intervertebral disc height, type of Modic change, grade of disc degeneration, and fusion rate were determined. Additionally, the presence or absence of high-intensity zone and vacuum disc were checked preoperatively. Clinical evaluation was performed by visual analog scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey before surgery and every 6 months postoperatively. Results The average patient age was 53.3 years (range, 31–73 years). The mean follow-up durations were 19.7 months. Seventeen patients (the APCD-ALIF group) underwent ALIF after APCD, and 19 patients underwent ALIF without APCD. The APCD-ALIF group had significantly improved clinical outcomes compared with the control group (visual analog scale score 1.8 ± 1.6 vs. 3.3 ± 2.4; P = 0.039: ODI score 6.7 ± 6.3 vs. 12.1 ± 6.8; P = 0.019). The surgical improvement rate was significantly associated with ODI score (P = 0.005). Conclusions The results of this study confirm that APCD aids surgical outcomes of ALIF in patients with suspected lumbar discogenic pain. We recommend performing APCD before ALIF to confirm lumbar discogenic pain.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8-15
Number of pages8
JournalWorld Neurosurgery
Volume97
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Back Pain
Pressure
Pain
Visual Analog Scale
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
Intervertebral Disc
Vacuum
Health Surveys
Cohort Studies
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Retrospective Studies
Tomography
X-Rays
Control Groups

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Lee, Chang Kyu ; Shin, DongAh ; Kim, Hyoung Ihl ; Yi, Seong ; Ha, Yoon ; Kim, Keung Nyun ; Yoon, Do Heum. / Automated Pressure-Controlled Discography in Patients Undergoing Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Discogenic Back Pain. In: World Neurosurgery. 2017 ; Vol. 97. pp. 8-15.
@article{2a3892a58dc845c9899f08ce987b884e,
title = "Automated Pressure-Controlled Discography in Patients Undergoing Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Discogenic Back Pain",
abstract = "Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with or without automated pressure-controlled discography (APCD) before the procedure. Methods Patients (n = 36) who underwent ALIF for lumbar discogenic back pain between 2008 and 2013 and were followed for more than 6 months were enrolled in this study. APCD was performed to identify discogenic back pain. Preoperative x-rays, computed tomography images, and magnetic resonance images were obtained. The intervertebral disc height, type of Modic change, grade of disc degeneration, and fusion rate were determined. Additionally, the presence or absence of high-intensity zone and vacuum disc were checked preoperatively. Clinical evaluation was performed by visual analog scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey before surgery and every 6 months postoperatively. Results The average patient age was 53.3 years (range, 31–73 years). The mean follow-up durations were 19.7 months. Seventeen patients (the APCD-ALIF group) underwent ALIF after APCD, and 19 patients underwent ALIF without APCD. The APCD-ALIF group had significantly improved clinical outcomes compared with the control group (visual analog scale score 1.8 ± 1.6 vs. 3.3 ± 2.4; P = 0.039: ODI score 6.7 ± 6.3 vs. 12.1 ± 6.8; P = 0.019). The surgical improvement rate was significantly associated with ODI score (P = 0.005). Conclusions The results of this study confirm that APCD aids surgical outcomes of ALIF in patients with suspected lumbar discogenic pain. We recommend performing APCD before ALIF to confirm lumbar discogenic pain.",
author = "Lee, {Chang Kyu} and DongAh Shin and Kim, {Hyoung Ihl} and Seong Yi and Yoon Ha and Kim, {Keung Nyun} and Yoon, {Do Heum}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.wneu.2016.09.019",
language = "English",
volume = "97",
pages = "8--15",
journal = "World Neurosurgery",
issn = "1878-8750",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

Automated Pressure-Controlled Discography in Patients Undergoing Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Discogenic Back Pain. / Lee, Chang Kyu; Shin, DongAh; Kim, Hyoung Ihl; Yi, Seong; Ha, Yoon; Kim, Keung Nyun; Yoon, Do Heum.

In: World Neurosurgery, Vol. 97, 01.01.2017, p. 8-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Automated Pressure-Controlled Discography in Patients Undergoing Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Discogenic Back Pain

AU - Lee, Chang Kyu

AU - Shin, DongAh

AU - Kim, Hyoung Ihl

AU - Yi, Seong

AU - Ha, Yoon

AU - Kim, Keung Nyun

AU - Yoon, Do Heum

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with or without automated pressure-controlled discography (APCD) before the procedure. Methods Patients (n = 36) who underwent ALIF for lumbar discogenic back pain between 2008 and 2013 and were followed for more than 6 months were enrolled in this study. APCD was performed to identify discogenic back pain. Preoperative x-rays, computed tomography images, and magnetic resonance images were obtained. The intervertebral disc height, type of Modic change, grade of disc degeneration, and fusion rate were determined. Additionally, the presence or absence of high-intensity zone and vacuum disc were checked preoperatively. Clinical evaluation was performed by visual analog scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey before surgery and every 6 months postoperatively. Results The average patient age was 53.3 years (range, 31–73 years). The mean follow-up durations were 19.7 months. Seventeen patients (the APCD-ALIF group) underwent ALIF after APCD, and 19 patients underwent ALIF without APCD. The APCD-ALIF group had significantly improved clinical outcomes compared with the control group (visual analog scale score 1.8 ± 1.6 vs. 3.3 ± 2.4; P = 0.039: ODI score 6.7 ± 6.3 vs. 12.1 ± 6.8; P = 0.019). The surgical improvement rate was significantly associated with ODI score (P = 0.005). Conclusions The results of this study confirm that APCD aids surgical outcomes of ALIF in patients with suspected lumbar discogenic pain. We recommend performing APCD before ALIF to confirm lumbar discogenic pain.

AB - Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with or without automated pressure-controlled discography (APCD) before the procedure. Methods Patients (n = 36) who underwent ALIF for lumbar discogenic back pain between 2008 and 2013 and were followed for more than 6 months were enrolled in this study. APCD was performed to identify discogenic back pain. Preoperative x-rays, computed tomography images, and magnetic resonance images were obtained. The intervertebral disc height, type of Modic change, grade of disc degeneration, and fusion rate were determined. Additionally, the presence or absence of high-intensity zone and vacuum disc were checked preoperatively. Clinical evaluation was performed by visual analog scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey before surgery and every 6 months postoperatively. Results The average patient age was 53.3 years (range, 31–73 years). The mean follow-up durations were 19.7 months. Seventeen patients (the APCD-ALIF group) underwent ALIF after APCD, and 19 patients underwent ALIF without APCD. The APCD-ALIF group had significantly improved clinical outcomes compared with the control group (visual analog scale score 1.8 ± 1.6 vs. 3.3 ± 2.4; P = 0.039: ODI score 6.7 ± 6.3 vs. 12.1 ± 6.8; P = 0.019). The surgical improvement rate was significantly associated with ODI score (P = 0.005). Conclusions The results of this study confirm that APCD aids surgical outcomes of ALIF in patients with suspected lumbar discogenic pain. We recommend performing APCD before ALIF to confirm lumbar discogenic pain.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994049966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994049966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.09.019

DO - 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.09.019

M3 - Article

VL - 97

SP - 8

EP - 15

JO - World Neurosurgery

JF - World Neurosurgery

SN - 1878-8750

ER -