Avoiding design errors: A case study of redesigning an architectural studio

G. Lee, C. M. Eastman, C. Zimring

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most design problems have multiple interacting constraints and levels of analysis. Some designers are able to reduce errors by developing heuristics and rules of thumb that lighten the cognitive load that such design problems impose. In this study we explore these heuristics by studying three groups of experienced architects solving a one-hour design problem that involves issues of multiple levels of spatial organization. Only one group was able to solve the problem. A special coding scheme was developed to explore the use of several kinds of heuristics such as problem decomposition into design units, rules of thumb from domain knowledge and strategic design moves. The differences in heuristics were examined to identify possible causes for these errors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)411-435
Number of pages25
JournalDesign Studies
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003 Sep 1

Fingerprint

Studios
heuristics
architect
coding
Group
Decomposition
organization
cause
Heuristics
knowledge

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Architecture
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Engineering(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this

Lee, G. ; Eastman, C. M. ; Zimring, C. / Avoiding design errors : A case study of redesigning an architectural studio. In: Design Studies. 2003 ; Vol. 24, No. 5. pp. 411-435.
@article{1ddca58017b544b8a1ba833e44f84d98,
title = "Avoiding design errors: A case study of redesigning an architectural studio",
abstract = "Most design problems have multiple interacting constraints and levels of analysis. Some designers are able to reduce errors by developing heuristics and rules of thumb that lighten the cognitive load that such design problems impose. In this study we explore these heuristics by studying three groups of experienced architects solving a one-hour design problem that involves issues of multiple levels of spatial organization. Only one group was able to solve the problem. A special coding scheme was developed to explore the use of several kinds of heuristics such as problem decomposition into design units, rules of thumb from domain knowledge and strategic design moves. The differences in heuristics were examined to identify possible causes for these errors.",
author = "G. Lee and Eastman, {C. M.} and C. Zimring",
year = "2003",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0142-694X(03)00002-4",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "411--435",
journal = "Design Studies",
issn = "0142-694X",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "5",

}

Avoiding design errors : A case study of redesigning an architectural studio. / Lee, G.; Eastman, C. M.; Zimring, C.

In: Design Studies, Vol. 24, No. 5, 01.09.2003, p. 411-435.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Avoiding design errors

T2 - A case study of redesigning an architectural studio

AU - Lee, G.

AU - Eastman, C. M.

AU - Zimring, C.

PY - 2003/9/1

Y1 - 2003/9/1

N2 - Most design problems have multiple interacting constraints and levels of analysis. Some designers are able to reduce errors by developing heuristics and rules of thumb that lighten the cognitive load that such design problems impose. In this study we explore these heuristics by studying three groups of experienced architects solving a one-hour design problem that involves issues of multiple levels of spatial organization. Only one group was able to solve the problem. A special coding scheme was developed to explore the use of several kinds of heuristics such as problem decomposition into design units, rules of thumb from domain knowledge and strategic design moves. The differences in heuristics were examined to identify possible causes for these errors.

AB - Most design problems have multiple interacting constraints and levels of analysis. Some designers are able to reduce errors by developing heuristics and rules of thumb that lighten the cognitive load that such design problems impose. In this study we explore these heuristics by studying three groups of experienced architects solving a one-hour design problem that involves issues of multiple levels of spatial organization. Only one group was able to solve the problem. A special coding scheme was developed to explore the use of several kinds of heuristics such as problem decomposition into design units, rules of thumb from domain knowledge and strategic design moves. The differences in heuristics were examined to identify possible causes for these errors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037864262&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037864262&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0142-694X(03)00002-4

DO - 10.1016/S0142-694X(03)00002-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0037864262

VL - 24

SP - 411

EP - 435

JO - Design Studies

JF - Design Studies

SN - 0142-694X

IS - 5

ER -