Benefici degli impianti attivi dell’orecchio medio rispetto alle protesi acustiche tradizionali nei pazienti con perdita dell’udito per le frequenze acute

Translated title of the contribution: Benefits of active middle ear implants over hearing aids in patients with sloping high tone hearing loss: Comparison with hearing aids

J. M. Lee, J. H. Jeon, InSeok Moon, Jae Young Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this retrospective chart review we compared the subjective and objective benefits of active middle ear implants (AMEIs) with conventional hearing aids (HAs) in patients with sloping high tone hearing loss. Thirty-four patients with sensorineural hearing loss were treated with AMEIs. Of these, six had sloping high tone hearing loss and had worn an HA for more than 6 months. Objective assessments, a pure-tone audiogram, as well as a word recognition test, and the Korean version of the Hearing in Noise Test (K-HINT), and a subjective assessment, the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) questionnaire, were performed. Tests were conducted under three circumstances: 1) the unaided state before surgery; 2) the HA-aided state before surgery; and 3) the AMEI-aided state 3 months after surgery. The average high-frequency hearing gain (≥ 2 kHz) was significantly better with AMEIs than with HAs. Although the result had no statistical significance, AMEIs showed a superior word recognition score (WRS) compared to HAs. However, the most comfortable hearing level at which the WRS was tested was significantly decreased with an AMEI compared to an HA. In the K-HINT, patients with an AMEI showed greater recognition than those fitted with an HA under both quiet and noisy conditions. The APAHB scores revealed that patients were more satisfied with an AMEI rather than an HA on all subscales. The use of vibroplasty in patients with sloping high tone loss resulted in positive hearing outcomes when compared to conventional HAs. Based on the data from this study, AMEIs provided better objective and subjective results and could, therefore, be a better alternative for the treatment of sloping hearing loss.

Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)218-223
Number of pages6
JournalActa Otorhinolaryngologica Italica
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Ossicular Prosthesis
Hearing Aids
Hearing Loss
Hearing
Noise
Sensorineural Hearing Loss

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

@article{a371a3fed48243429bdf049f035a47e3,
title = "Benefici degli impianti attivi dell’orecchio medio rispetto alle protesi acustiche tradizionali nei pazienti con perdita dell’udito per le frequenze acute",
abstract = "In this retrospective chart review we compared the subjective and objective benefits of active middle ear implants (AMEIs) with conventional hearing aids (HAs) in patients with sloping high tone hearing loss. Thirty-four patients with sensorineural hearing loss were treated with AMEIs. Of these, six had sloping high tone hearing loss and had worn an HA for more than 6 months. Objective assessments, a pure-tone audiogram, as well as a word recognition test, and the Korean version of the Hearing in Noise Test (K-HINT), and a subjective assessment, the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) questionnaire, were performed. Tests were conducted under three circumstances: 1) the unaided state before surgery; 2) the HA-aided state before surgery; and 3) the AMEI-aided state 3 months after surgery. The average high-frequency hearing gain (≥ 2 kHz) was significantly better with AMEIs than with HAs. Although the result had no statistical significance, AMEIs showed a superior word recognition score (WRS) compared to HAs. However, the most comfortable hearing level at which the WRS was tested was significantly decreased with an AMEI compared to an HA. In the K-HINT, patients with an AMEI showed greater recognition than those fitted with an HA under both quiet and noisy conditions. The APAHB scores revealed that patients were more satisfied with an AMEI rather than an HA on all subscales. The use of vibroplasty in patients with sloping high tone loss resulted in positive hearing outcomes when compared to conventional HAs. Based on the data from this study, AMEIs provided better objective and subjective results and could, therefore, be a better alternative for the treatment of sloping hearing loss.",
author = "Lee, {J. M.} and Jeon, {J. H.} and InSeok Moon and Choi, {Jae Young}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.14639/0392-100X-1146",
language = "Italian",
volume = "37",
pages = "218--223",
journal = "Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica",
issn = "0392-100X",
publisher = "Pacini Editore s.r.l.",
number = "3",

}

Benefici degli impianti attivi dell’orecchio medio rispetto alle protesi acustiche tradizionali nei pazienti con perdita dell’udito per le frequenze acute. / Lee, J. M.; Jeon, J. H.; Moon, InSeok; Choi, Jae Young.

In: Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica, Vol. 37, No. 3, 01.01.2017, p. 218-223.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benefici degli impianti attivi dell’orecchio medio rispetto alle protesi acustiche tradizionali nei pazienti con perdita dell’udito per le frequenze acute

AU - Lee, J. M.

AU - Jeon, J. H.

AU - Moon, InSeok

AU - Choi, Jae Young

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - In this retrospective chart review we compared the subjective and objective benefits of active middle ear implants (AMEIs) with conventional hearing aids (HAs) in patients with sloping high tone hearing loss. Thirty-four patients with sensorineural hearing loss were treated with AMEIs. Of these, six had sloping high tone hearing loss and had worn an HA for more than 6 months. Objective assessments, a pure-tone audiogram, as well as a word recognition test, and the Korean version of the Hearing in Noise Test (K-HINT), and a subjective assessment, the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) questionnaire, were performed. Tests were conducted under three circumstances: 1) the unaided state before surgery; 2) the HA-aided state before surgery; and 3) the AMEI-aided state 3 months after surgery. The average high-frequency hearing gain (≥ 2 kHz) was significantly better with AMEIs than with HAs. Although the result had no statistical significance, AMEIs showed a superior word recognition score (WRS) compared to HAs. However, the most comfortable hearing level at which the WRS was tested was significantly decreased with an AMEI compared to an HA. In the K-HINT, patients with an AMEI showed greater recognition than those fitted with an HA under both quiet and noisy conditions. The APAHB scores revealed that patients were more satisfied with an AMEI rather than an HA on all subscales. The use of vibroplasty in patients with sloping high tone loss resulted in positive hearing outcomes when compared to conventional HAs. Based on the data from this study, AMEIs provided better objective and subjective results and could, therefore, be a better alternative for the treatment of sloping hearing loss.

AB - In this retrospective chart review we compared the subjective and objective benefits of active middle ear implants (AMEIs) with conventional hearing aids (HAs) in patients with sloping high tone hearing loss. Thirty-four patients with sensorineural hearing loss were treated with AMEIs. Of these, six had sloping high tone hearing loss and had worn an HA for more than 6 months. Objective assessments, a pure-tone audiogram, as well as a word recognition test, and the Korean version of the Hearing in Noise Test (K-HINT), and a subjective assessment, the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) questionnaire, were performed. Tests were conducted under three circumstances: 1) the unaided state before surgery; 2) the HA-aided state before surgery; and 3) the AMEI-aided state 3 months after surgery. The average high-frequency hearing gain (≥ 2 kHz) was significantly better with AMEIs than with HAs. Although the result had no statistical significance, AMEIs showed a superior word recognition score (WRS) compared to HAs. However, the most comfortable hearing level at which the WRS was tested was significantly decreased with an AMEI compared to an HA. In the K-HINT, patients with an AMEI showed greater recognition than those fitted with an HA under both quiet and noisy conditions. The APAHB scores revealed that patients were more satisfied with an AMEI rather than an HA on all subscales. The use of vibroplasty in patients with sloping high tone loss resulted in positive hearing outcomes when compared to conventional HAs. Based on the data from this study, AMEIs provided better objective and subjective results and could, therefore, be a better alternative for the treatment of sloping hearing loss.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019618979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019618979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14639/0392-100X-1146

DO - 10.14639/0392-100X-1146

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 218

EP - 223

JO - Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica

JF - Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica

SN - 0392-100X

IS - 3

ER -