Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to validate and compare treatment outcomes for endoscopic resection of sinonasal inverted papilloma (IP) with or without the use of a navigation system. Materials and methods: A total of 58 patients who underwent endoscopic resection of sinonasal inverted papilloma by a single surgeon from 2007 to 2016 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Depending on the use of the navigation system, subjects were divided into two groups: a conventional endoscopic resection group without navigation system (CER group) and a navigation-assisted endoscopic resection group (NER group). Results: There were 24 patients (41.4%) in the CER group and 34 patients (58.6%) in the NER group. Treatment outcomes showed that navigation-assisted endoscopic resection was a more beneficial surgical technique than conventional endoscopic resection for sinonasal IP. Post-surgical recurrence was noted in seven cases (29.2%) in the CER group and two cases (5.9%) in the NER group. Accordingly, the recurrence rate was significantly less in the NER group compared to the CER group (p = 0.026). There were two cases of complications (8.3%) in the CER group comprising cerebrospinal fluid leak and periorbital fat exposure, while no complications were noted for the NER group (p = 0.167). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that navigation-assisted endoscopic removal of sinonasal IP is helpful for reducing recurrence and avoiding surgical complications. Therefore, navigation systems should be always considered when performing endoscopic removal of sinonasal IP.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 937-941 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 Jun |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Surgery
- Oral Surgery
- Otorhinolaryngology
Cite this
}
Better surgical outcome by image-guided navigation system in endoscopic removal of sinonasal inverted papilloma. / Ahn, Sang Hyeon; Lee, Eun Jung; Kim, Jin Won; Baek, Kwang Ha; Cho, Hyung Ju; Yoon, Joo Heon; Kim, Chang Hoon.
In: Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol. 46, No. 6, 06.2018, p. 937-941.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Better surgical outcome by image-guided navigation system in endoscopic removal of sinonasal inverted papilloma
AU - Ahn, Sang Hyeon
AU - Lee, Eun Jung
AU - Kim, Jin Won
AU - Baek, Kwang Ha
AU - Cho, Hyung Ju
AU - Yoon, Joo Heon
AU - Kim, Chang Hoon
PY - 2018/6
Y1 - 2018/6
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to validate and compare treatment outcomes for endoscopic resection of sinonasal inverted papilloma (IP) with or without the use of a navigation system. Materials and methods: A total of 58 patients who underwent endoscopic resection of sinonasal inverted papilloma by a single surgeon from 2007 to 2016 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Depending on the use of the navigation system, subjects were divided into two groups: a conventional endoscopic resection group without navigation system (CER group) and a navigation-assisted endoscopic resection group (NER group). Results: There were 24 patients (41.4%) in the CER group and 34 patients (58.6%) in the NER group. Treatment outcomes showed that navigation-assisted endoscopic resection was a more beneficial surgical technique than conventional endoscopic resection for sinonasal IP. Post-surgical recurrence was noted in seven cases (29.2%) in the CER group and two cases (5.9%) in the NER group. Accordingly, the recurrence rate was significantly less in the NER group compared to the CER group (p = 0.026). There were two cases of complications (8.3%) in the CER group comprising cerebrospinal fluid leak and periorbital fat exposure, while no complications were noted for the NER group (p = 0.167). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that navigation-assisted endoscopic removal of sinonasal IP is helpful for reducing recurrence and avoiding surgical complications. Therefore, navigation systems should be always considered when performing endoscopic removal of sinonasal IP.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to validate and compare treatment outcomes for endoscopic resection of sinonasal inverted papilloma (IP) with or without the use of a navigation system. Materials and methods: A total of 58 patients who underwent endoscopic resection of sinonasal inverted papilloma by a single surgeon from 2007 to 2016 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Depending on the use of the navigation system, subjects were divided into two groups: a conventional endoscopic resection group without navigation system (CER group) and a navigation-assisted endoscopic resection group (NER group). Results: There were 24 patients (41.4%) in the CER group and 34 patients (58.6%) in the NER group. Treatment outcomes showed that navigation-assisted endoscopic resection was a more beneficial surgical technique than conventional endoscopic resection for sinonasal IP. Post-surgical recurrence was noted in seven cases (29.2%) in the CER group and two cases (5.9%) in the NER group. Accordingly, the recurrence rate was significantly less in the NER group compared to the CER group (p = 0.026). There were two cases of complications (8.3%) in the CER group comprising cerebrospinal fluid leak and periorbital fat exposure, while no complications were noted for the NER group (p = 0.167). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that navigation-assisted endoscopic removal of sinonasal IP is helpful for reducing recurrence and avoiding surgical complications. Therefore, navigation systems should be always considered when performing endoscopic removal of sinonasal IP.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045583439&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045583439&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.03.012
DO - 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.03.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 29678350
AN - SCOPUS:85045583439
VL - 46
SP - 937
EP - 941
JO - Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery
JF - Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery
SN - 1010-5182
IS - 6
ER -