Beyond economic sanctions

Rethinking the North Korean sanctions regime

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In 2010, Taiwan's president, Ma Ying-jeou, explained the rationale for his country signing a major economic cooperation treaty with mainland China with the following statement: "We can handle diplomatic isolation, but economic isolation is fatal." This essay will make the argument that in the case of North Korea, the opposite is true: Economic isolation appears fairly manageable for Pyongyang, but diplomatic sanctions may in fact enhance a broad coercive strategy significantly.This argument will be framed within the broader claim that in particular in the case of North Korea, sanctions have been conceptualized too narrowly-they have been viewed as economic coercion only. Instead, the argument is made that sanctioning states should consider the entire spectrum allowed under Chapter VII, Article 41 of the UN Charter.The discussion in this article will be limited to the case of North Korea for reasons of space and the urgent need to address the deteriorating security situation on the Korean Peninsula, given the country's rise to quasi-nuclear power status. In light of this development, the sanctions regime currently in place needs to be reevaluated. A reorientation towards diplomatic sanctions will allow for a broader coercive strategy that is mindful of nuclear deterrence but goes beyond economic sanctions, which have not been successful in restricting Pyongyang's military-strategic objectives.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-56
Number of pages12
JournalNorth Korean Review
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Sep 1

Fingerprint

economic sanction
sanction
North Korea
social isolation
economics
economic cooperation
nuclear power
deterrence
charter
treaty
UNO
Taiwan
president
Military
China
Economic sanctions
Sanctions
Economics
Isolation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cultural Studies
  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

Cite this

@article{ac02fc88b40f4a1ab10c55a0c6bc878a,
title = "Beyond economic sanctions: Rethinking the North Korean sanctions regime",
abstract = "In 2010, Taiwan's president, Ma Ying-jeou, explained the rationale for his country signing a major economic cooperation treaty with mainland China with the following statement: {"}We can handle diplomatic isolation, but economic isolation is fatal.{"} This essay will make the argument that in the case of North Korea, the opposite is true: Economic isolation appears fairly manageable for Pyongyang, but diplomatic sanctions may in fact enhance a broad coercive strategy significantly.This argument will be framed within the broader claim that in particular in the case of North Korea, sanctions have been conceptualized too narrowly-they have been viewed as economic coercion only. Instead, the argument is made that sanctioning states should consider the entire spectrum allowed under Chapter VII, Article 41 of the UN Charter.The discussion in this article will be limited to the case of North Korea for reasons of space and the urgent need to address the deteriorating security situation on the Korean Peninsula, given the country's rise to quasi-nuclear power status. In light of this development, the sanctions regime currently in place needs to be reevaluated. A reorientation towards diplomatic sanctions will allow for a broader coercive strategy that is mindful of nuclear deterrence but goes beyond economic sanctions, which have not been successful in restricting Pyongyang's military-strategic objectives.",
author = "Matthias Maass",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3172/NKR.7.2.45",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "45--56",
journal = "North Korean Review",
issn = "1551-2789",
publisher = "McFarland and Company, Inc",
number = "2",

}

Beyond economic sanctions : Rethinking the North Korean sanctions regime. / Maass, Matthias.

In: North Korean Review, Vol. 7, No. 2, 01.09.2011, p. 45-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond economic sanctions

T2 - Rethinking the North Korean sanctions regime

AU - Maass, Matthias

PY - 2011/9/1

Y1 - 2011/9/1

N2 - In 2010, Taiwan's president, Ma Ying-jeou, explained the rationale for his country signing a major economic cooperation treaty with mainland China with the following statement: "We can handle diplomatic isolation, but economic isolation is fatal." This essay will make the argument that in the case of North Korea, the opposite is true: Economic isolation appears fairly manageable for Pyongyang, but diplomatic sanctions may in fact enhance a broad coercive strategy significantly.This argument will be framed within the broader claim that in particular in the case of North Korea, sanctions have been conceptualized too narrowly-they have been viewed as economic coercion only. Instead, the argument is made that sanctioning states should consider the entire spectrum allowed under Chapter VII, Article 41 of the UN Charter.The discussion in this article will be limited to the case of North Korea for reasons of space and the urgent need to address the deteriorating security situation on the Korean Peninsula, given the country's rise to quasi-nuclear power status. In light of this development, the sanctions regime currently in place needs to be reevaluated. A reorientation towards diplomatic sanctions will allow for a broader coercive strategy that is mindful of nuclear deterrence but goes beyond economic sanctions, which have not been successful in restricting Pyongyang's military-strategic objectives.

AB - In 2010, Taiwan's president, Ma Ying-jeou, explained the rationale for his country signing a major economic cooperation treaty with mainland China with the following statement: "We can handle diplomatic isolation, but economic isolation is fatal." This essay will make the argument that in the case of North Korea, the opposite is true: Economic isolation appears fairly manageable for Pyongyang, but diplomatic sanctions may in fact enhance a broad coercive strategy significantly.This argument will be framed within the broader claim that in particular in the case of North Korea, sanctions have been conceptualized too narrowly-they have been viewed as economic coercion only. Instead, the argument is made that sanctioning states should consider the entire spectrum allowed under Chapter VII, Article 41 of the UN Charter.The discussion in this article will be limited to the case of North Korea for reasons of space and the urgent need to address the deteriorating security situation on the Korean Peninsula, given the country's rise to quasi-nuclear power status. In light of this development, the sanctions regime currently in place needs to be reevaluated. A reorientation towards diplomatic sanctions will allow for a broader coercive strategy that is mindful of nuclear deterrence but goes beyond economic sanctions, which have not been successful in restricting Pyongyang's military-strategic objectives.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053274534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053274534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3172/NKR.7.2.45

DO - 10.3172/NKR.7.2.45

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 45

EP - 56

JO - North Korean Review

JF - North Korean Review

SN - 1551-2789

IS - 2

ER -