Biological efficacy of two mineral trioxide aggregate (Mta)-based materials in a canine model of pulpotomy

Myeongyeon Lee, Chung Min Kang, Je Seon Song, Yoo Seok Shin, Seungh Ye Kim, Seong Oh Kim, Hyung Jun Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the biocompatibility of Endocem Zr® and ProRoot MTA® by histopathologic analysis in a canine model of pulpotomy. This study utilized 39 teeth of two beagle dogs. The exposed pulp tissues were treated by pulpotomy using ProRoot MTA (n=19) or Endocem Zr (n=20). After 8 weeks, the teeth were extracted and processed with hematoxylin-eosin staining for histologic evaluation. Most of the specimens in both groups developed a calcific barrier at the pulp amputation site and formed an odontoblast layer. However, some of the Endocem Zr specimens showed less calcific barrier formation with a greater inflammatory response and less odontoblast layer formation when compared with the ProRoot MTA specimens. ProRoot MTA and Endocem Zr specimens developed a calcific barrier; however, ProRoot MTA was more biocompatible than Endocem Zr.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberdmj/2016-121
Pages (from-to)41-47
Number of pages7
JournalDental Materials Journal
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Pemetrexed
Pulpotomy
Pulp
Canidae
Minerals
Odontoblasts
Biocompatibility
Tissue
Tooth
Hematoxylin
Eosine Yellowish-(YS)
Amputation
endocem
mineral trioxide aggregate
Dogs
Staining and Labeling

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ceramics and Composites
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Lee, Myeongyeon ; Kang, Chung Min ; Song, Je Seon ; Shin, Yoo Seok ; Kim, Seungh Ye ; Kim, Seong Oh ; Choi, Hyung Jun. / Biological efficacy of two mineral trioxide aggregate (Mta)-based materials in a canine model of pulpotomy. In: Dental Materials Journal. 2017 ; Vol. 36, No. 1. pp. 41-47.
@article{b1f2b97cc78b464c8eafa674bdb86bdd,
title = "Biological efficacy of two mineral trioxide aggregate (Mta)-based materials in a canine model of pulpotomy",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to compare the biocompatibility of Endocem Zr{\circledR} and ProRoot MTA{\circledR} by histopathologic analysis in a canine model of pulpotomy. This study utilized 39 teeth of two beagle dogs. The exposed pulp tissues were treated by pulpotomy using ProRoot MTA (n=19) or Endocem Zr (n=20). After 8 weeks, the teeth were extracted and processed with hematoxylin-eosin staining for histologic evaluation. Most of the specimens in both groups developed a calcific barrier at the pulp amputation site and formed an odontoblast layer. However, some of the Endocem Zr specimens showed less calcific barrier formation with a greater inflammatory response and less odontoblast layer formation when compared with the ProRoot MTA specimens. ProRoot MTA and Endocem Zr specimens developed a calcific barrier; however, ProRoot MTA was more biocompatible than Endocem Zr.",
author = "Myeongyeon Lee and Kang, {Chung Min} and Song, {Je Seon} and Shin, {Yoo Seok} and Kim, {Seungh Ye} and Kim, {Seong Oh} and Choi, {Hyung Jun}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4012/dmj.2016-121",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "41--47",
journal = "Dental Materials Journal",
issn = "0287-4547",
publisher = "Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices",
number = "1",

}

Biological efficacy of two mineral trioxide aggregate (Mta)-based materials in a canine model of pulpotomy. / Lee, Myeongyeon; Kang, Chung Min; Song, Je Seon; Shin, Yoo Seok; Kim, Seungh Ye; Kim, Seong Oh; Choi, Hyung Jun.

In: Dental Materials Journal, Vol. 36, No. 1, dmj/2016-121, 01.01.2017, p. 41-47.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biological efficacy of two mineral trioxide aggregate (Mta)-based materials in a canine model of pulpotomy

AU - Lee, Myeongyeon

AU - Kang, Chung Min

AU - Song, Je Seon

AU - Shin, Yoo Seok

AU - Kim, Seungh Ye

AU - Kim, Seong Oh

AU - Choi, Hyung Jun

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - The aim of this study was to compare the biocompatibility of Endocem Zr® and ProRoot MTA® by histopathologic analysis in a canine model of pulpotomy. This study utilized 39 teeth of two beagle dogs. The exposed pulp tissues were treated by pulpotomy using ProRoot MTA (n=19) or Endocem Zr (n=20). After 8 weeks, the teeth were extracted and processed with hematoxylin-eosin staining for histologic evaluation. Most of the specimens in both groups developed a calcific barrier at the pulp amputation site and formed an odontoblast layer. However, some of the Endocem Zr specimens showed less calcific barrier formation with a greater inflammatory response and less odontoblast layer formation when compared with the ProRoot MTA specimens. ProRoot MTA and Endocem Zr specimens developed a calcific barrier; however, ProRoot MTA was more biocompatible than Endocem Zr.

AB - The aim of this study was to compare the biocompatibility of Endocem Zr® and ProRoot MTA® by histopathologic analysis in a canine model of pulpotomy. This study utilized 39 teeth of two beagle dogs. The exposed pulp tissues were treated by pulpotomy using ProRoot MTA (n=19) or Endocem Zr (n=20). After 8 weeks, the teeth were extracted and processed with hematoxylin-eosin staining for histologic evaluation. Most of the specimens in both groups developed a calcific barrier at the pulp amputation site and formed an odontoblast layer. However, some of the Endocem Zr specimens showed less calcific barrier formation with a greater inflammatory response and less odontoblast layer formation when compared with the ProRoot MTA specimens. ProRoot MTA and Endocem Zr specimens developed a calcific barrier; however, ProRoot MTA was more biocompatible than Endocem Zr.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011636590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011636590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4012/dmj.2016-121

DO - 10.4012/dmj.2016-121

M3 - Article

C2 - 27928103

AN - SCOPUS:85011636590

VL - 36

SP - 41

EP - 47

JO - Dental Materials Journal

JF - Dental Materials Journal

SN - 0287-4547

IS - 1

M1 - dmj/2016-121

ER -