Bipolarity in reactions to operational 'constraints': OM bugs under an OB lens

Elliot Bendoly, Daesik Hur

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the 1980 inaugural issue of the Journal of Operations Management, Powell and Johnson stressed the need to introduce behavioral factors into research models of operational processes and performance. While some progress has been made since then, contemporary authors argue that limited dialogue between operations management and behavioral researchers continues to restrict the interpretability of such studies. Drawing on expertise from both operations and behavioral research, and motivated by a case example, we intend to further this dialogue. In doing so, we outline interdisciplinary commonalities and several methodological pitfalls that those studying the links between resource constraints and operational performance should take into account when developing new research. These issues range from appropriate model conceptualization to operationalization for empirical studies. Recommendations for appropriately confronting methodological concerns related to these issues are provided.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Operations Management
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Lenses
Behavioral research
Operations research
Operations management
Conceptualization
Business performance
Empirical study
Factors
Commonality
Operationalization
Expertise
Resource constraints

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

@article{ff9843c03a314b82924ac62a07912b19,
title = "Bipolarity in reactions to operational 'constraints': OM bugs under an OB lens",
abstract = "In the 1980 inaugural issue of the Journal of Operations Management, Powell and Johnson stressed the need to introduce behavioral factors into research models of operational processes and performance. While some progress has been made since then, contemporary authors argue that limited dialogue between operations management and behavioral researchers continues to restrict the interpretability of such studies. Drawing on expertise from both operations and behavioral research, and motivated by a case example, we intend to further this dialogue. In doing so, we outline interdisciplinary commonalities and several methodological pitfalls that those studying the links between resource constraints and operational performance should take into account when developing new research. These issues range from appropriate model conceptualization to operationalization for empirical studies. Recommendations for appropriately confronting methodological concerns related to these issues are provided.",
author = "Elliot Bendoly and Daesik Hur",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jom.2005.08.004",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "1--13",
journal = "Journal of Operations Management",
issn = "0272-6963",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Bipolarity in reactions to operational 'constraints' : OM bugs under an OB lens. / Bendoly, Elliot; Hur, Daesik.

In: Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 25, No. 1, 01.01.2007, p. 1-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bipolarity in reactions to operational 'constraints'

T2 - OM bugs under an OB lens

AU - Bendoly, Elliot

AU - Hur, Daesik

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - In the 1980 inaugural issue of the Journal of Operations Management, Powell and Johnson stressed the need to introduce behavioral factors into research models of operational processes and performance. While some progress has been made since then, contemporary authors argue that limited dialogue between operations management and behavioral researchers continues to restrict the interpretability of such studies. Drawing on expertise from both operations and behavioral research, and motivated by a case example, we intend to further this dialogue. In doing so, we outline interdisciplinary commonalities and several methodological pitfalls that those studying the links between resource constraints and operational performance should take into account when developing new research. These issues range from appropriate model conceptualization to operationalization for empirical studies. Recommendations for appropriately confronting methodological concerns related to these issues are provided.

AB - In the 1980 inaugural issue of the Journal of Operations Management, Powell and Johnson stressed the need to introduce behavioral factors into research models of operational processes and performance. While some progress has been made since then, contemporary authors argue that limited dialogue between operations management and behavioral researchers continues to restrict the interpretability of such studies. Drawing on expertise from both operations and behavioral research, and motivated by a case example, we intend to further this dialogue. In doing so, we outline interdisciplinary commonalities and several methodological pitfalls that those studying the links between resource constraints and operational performance should take into account when developing new research. These issues range from appropriate model conceptualization to operationalization for empirical studies. Recommendations for appropriately confronting methodological concerns related to these issues are provided.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845416201&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845416201&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jom.2005.08.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jom.2005.08.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33845416201

VL - 25

SP - 1

EP - 13

JO - Journal of Operations Management

JF - Journal of Operations Management

SN - 0272-6963

IS - 1

ER -