Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of flap and mini-flap implant surgeries on crestal bone changes around dental implants. Study design: A total of 286 implants were placed in 129 patients: 142 implants were placed in 58 patients by using a conventional flap procedure, and 144 implants were placed in 71 patients by using a mini-flap procedure. The 2 groups were evaluated radiographically for postoperative changes in the crestal bone level from the time of placement to the time of exposure (3 to 4 months later). Results: The mean crestal bone loss was 0.26 mm in the flap group and 0.20 mm in the mini-flap group (P > .05). The success rate was 96.5% in the flap group and 100% in the mini-flap group (P < .05). Conclusion: The results indicate that when implants are placed using a mini-flap procedure, the mini-flap procedure may increase the success rate.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 293-296 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology |
| Volume | 105 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 Mar 1 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Surgery
- Oral Surgery
- Otorhinolaryngology
- Dentistry(all)
Cite this
}
Bone healing around implants following flap and mini-flap surgeries : a radiographic evaluation between stage I and stage II surgery. / Jeong, Seung Mi; Choi, Byung Ho; Li, Jingxu; Ahn, Kang Min; Lee, Seoung Ho; Xuan, Feng.
In: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology, Vol. 105, No. 3, 01.03.2008, p. 293-296.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Bone healing around implants following flap and mini-flap surgeries
T2 - a radiographic evaluation between stage I and stage II surgery
AU - Jeong, Seung Mi
AU - Choi, Byung Ho
AU - Li, Jingxu
AU - Ahn, Kang Min
AU - Lee, Seoung Ho
AU - Xuan, Feng
PY - 2008/3/1
Y1 - 2008/3/1
N2 - Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of flap and mini-flap implant surgeries on crestal bone changes around dental implants. Study design: A total of 286 implants were placed in 129 patients: 142 implants were placed in 58 patients by using a conventional flap procedure, and 144 implants were placed in 71 patients by using a mini-flap procedure. The 2 groups were evaluated radiographically for postoperative changes in the crestal bone level from the time of placement to the time of exposure (3 to 4 months later). Results: The mean crestal bone loss was 0.26 mm in the flap group and 0.20 mm in the mini-flap group (P > .05). The success rate was 96.5% in the flap group and 100% in the mini-flap group (P < .05). Conclusion: The results indicate that when implants are placed using a mini-flap procedure, the mini-flap procedure may increase the success rate.
AB - Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of flap and mini-flap implant surgeries on crestal bone changes around dental implants. Study design: A total of 286 implants were placed in 129 patients: 142 implants were placed in 58 patients by using a conventional flap procedure, and 144 implants were placed in 71 patients by using a mini-flap procedure. The 2 groups were evaluated radiographically for postoperative changes in the crestal bone level from the time of placement to the time of exposure (3 to 4 months later). Results: The mean crestal bone loss was 0.26 mm in the flap group and 0.20 mm in the mini-flap group (P > .05). The success rate was 96.5% in the flap group and 100% in the mini-flap group (P < .05). Conclusion: The results indicate that when implants are placed using a mini-flap procedure, the mini-flap procedure may increase the success rate.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38949133070&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38949133070&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.07.004
DO - 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.07.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 18280961
AN - SCOPUS:38949133070
VL - 105
SP - 293
EP - 296
JO - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
JF - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
SN - 2212-4403
IS - 3
ER -