Buyer Power and Supplier Relationship Commitment: A Cognitive Evaluation Theory Perspective

Sangho Chae, Thomas Y. Choi, Dae Sik Hur

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Our study investigates how buyer power affects supplier relationship commitment. When a buyer exerts power on a supplier, the supplier response can be either simple compliance or commitment at a deeper level. Theoretically, the latter pertains to a supplier's intrinsic motivation. Building on cognitive evaluation theory, our model proposes the distinctive yet interactive nature of reward power and coercive power, commonly considered together as mediated powers. It also posits that nonmediated powers (expert, referent, and legitimate) amplify the influences of reward and coercive powers. An empirical investigation, based on large-scale multinational survey data, provides support for our theoretical arguments. We discuss the practical implications for how buyers can use reward and coercive powers to improve supplier relationship commitment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-60
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Supply Chain Management
Volume53
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Apr 1

Fingerprint

Supplier relationships
Evaluation theory
Buyer power
Relationship commitment
Compliance
Reward
Suppliers
Intrinsic motivation
Survey data
Buyers
Multinationals
Empirical investigation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Management Information Systems
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
  • Marketing

Cite this

@article{44d0f4d3153847698b9536d705b05e4b,
title = "Buyer Power and Supplier Relationship Commitment: A Cognitive Evaluation Theory Perspective",
abstract = "Our study investigates how buyer power affects supplier relationship commitment. When a buyer exerts power on a supplier, the supplier response can be either simple compliance or commitment at a deeper level. Theoretically, the latter pertains to a supplier's intrinsic motivation. Building on cognitive evaluation theory, our model proposes the distinctive yet interactive nature of reward power and coercive power, commonly considered together as mediated powers. It also posits that nonmediated powers (expert, referent, and legitimate) amplify the influences of reward and coercive powers. An empirical investigation, based on large-scale multinational survey data, provides support for our theoretical arguments. We discuss the practical implications for how buyers can use reward and coercive powers to improve supplier relationship commitment.",
author = "Sangho Chae and Choi, {Thomas Y.} and Hur, {Dae Sik}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jscm.12138",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "39--60",
journal = "Journal of Supply Chain Management",
issn = "1523-2409",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Buyer Power and Supplier Relationship Commitment : A Cognitive Evaluation Theory Perspective. / Chae, Sangho; Choi, Thomas Y.; Hur, Dae Sik.

In: Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 53, No. 2, 01.04.2017, p. 39-60.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Buyer Power and Supplier Relationship Commitment

T2 - A Cognitive Evaluation Theory Perspective

AU - Chae, Sangho

AU - Choi, Thomas Y.

AU - Hur, Dae Sik

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Our study investigates how buyer power affects supplier relationship commitment. When a buyer exerts power on a supplier, the supplier response can be either simple compliance or commitment at a deeper level. Theoretically, the latter pertains to a supplier's intrinsic motivation. Building on cognitive evaluation theory, our model proposes the distinctive yet interactive nature of reward power and coercive power, commonly considered together as mediated powers. It also posits that nonmediated powers (expert, referent, and legitimate) amplify the influences of reward and coercive powers. An empirical investigation, based on large-scale multinational survey data, provides support for our theoretical arguments. We discuss the practical implications for how buyers can use reward and coercive powers to improve supplier relationship commitment.

AB - Our study investigates how buyer power affects supplier relationship commitment. When a buyer exerts power on a supplier, the supplier response can be either simple compliance or commitment at a deeper level. Theoretically, the latter pertains to a supplier's intrinsic motivation. Building on cognitive evaluation theory, our model proposes the distinctive yet interactive nature of reward power and coercive power, commonly considered together as mediated powers. It also posits that nonmediated powers (expert, referent, and legitimate) amplify the influences of reward and coercive powers. An empirical investigation, based on large-scale multinational survey data, provides support for our theoretical arguments. We discuss the practical implications for how buyers can use reward and coercive powers to improve supplier relationship commitment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017288257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017288257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jscm.12138

DO - 10.1111/jscm.12138

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85017288257

VL - 53

SP - 39

EP - 60

JO - Journal of Supply Chain Management

JF - Journal of Supply Chain Management

SN - 1523-2409

IS - 2

ER -