Can budget ambiguity crowd out intrinsic motivation? Longitudinal evidence from federal executive departments

Jongmin Shon, Gregory A. Porumbescu, Robert K. Christensen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

While some scholars have assessed how various features of organizational structure shape intrinsic motivation, the role of budgets and, in particular, programme funding has been overlooked. To address this gap in the literature, we examine how programme funding decisions impact employee motivation. Referencing previous work, we hypothesize that funding choices that emphasize some programmes over others signal clearer organizational goals for employees, thereby increasing intrinsic motivation. In contrast, departments that do not use their budgets to signal clear goals can run the risk of reducing their employees’ intrinsic motivation. We empirically investigate this hypothesis within the context of the US Federal executive departments, constructing a longitudinal dataset (2010–15) from multiple sources. Findings support our hypothesis. Employees in departments that more evenly fund their programmes report lower levels of intrinsic motivation.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPublic Administration
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2019 Jan 1

Fingerprint

intrinsic motivation
budget
employee
funding
evidence
organizational goal
organizational structure

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration

Cite this

@article{8f6b5ee16d984511ab988ce0d5c2284d,
title = "Can budget ambiguity crowd out intrinsic motivation? Longitudinal evidence from federal executive departments",
abstract = "While some scholars have assessed how various features of organizational structure shape intrinsic motivation, the role of budgets and, in particular, programme funding has been overlooked. To address this gap in the literature, we examine how programme funding decisions impact employee motivation. Referencing previous work, we hypothesize that funding choices that emphasize some programmes over others signal clearer organizational goals for employees, thereby increasing intrinsic motivation. In contrast, departments that do not use their budgets to signal clear goals can run the risk of reducing their employees’ intrinsic motivation. We empirically investigate this hypothesis within the context of the US Federal executive departments, constructing a longitudinal dataset (2010–15) from multiple sources. Findings support our hypothesis. Employees in departments that more evenly fund their programmes report lower levels of intrinsic motivation.",
author = "Jongmin Shon and Porumbescu, {Gregory A.} and Christensen, {Robert K.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/padm.12618",
language = "English",
journal = "Public Administration",
issn = "0033-3298",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

Can budget ambiguity crowd out intrinsic motivation? Longitudinal evidence from federal executive departments. / Shon, Jongmin; Porumbescu, Gregory A.; Christensen, Robert K.

In: Public Administration, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can budget ambiguity crowd out intrinsic motivation? Longitudinal evidence from federal executive departments

AU - Shon, Jongmin

AU - Porumbescu, Gregory A.

AU - Christensen, Robert K.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - While some scholars have assessed how various features of organizational structure shape intrinsic motivation, the role of budgets and, in particular, programme funding has been overlooked. To address this gap in the literature, we examine how programme funding decisions impact employee motivation. Referencing previous work, we hypothesize that funding choices that emphasize some programmes over others signal clearer organizational goals for employees, thereby increasing intrinsic motivation. In contrast, departments that do not use their budgets to signal clear goals can run the risk of reducing their employees’ intrinsic motivation. We empirically investigate this hypothesis within the context of the US Federal executive departments, constructing a longitudinal dataset (2010–15) from multiple sources. Findings support our hypothesis. Employees in departments that more evenly fund their programmes report lower levels of intrinsic motivation.

AB - While some scholars have assessed how various features of organizational structure shape intrinsic motivation, the role of budgets and, in particular, programme funding has been overlooked. To address this gap in the literature, we examine how programme funding decisions impact employee motivation. Referencing previous work, we hypothesize that funding choices that emphasize some programmes over others signal clearer organizational goals for employees, thereby increasing intrinsic motivation. In contrast, departments that do not use their budgets to signal clear goals can run the risk of reducing their employees’ intrinsic motivation. We empirically investigate this hypothesis within the context of the US Federal executive departments, constructing a longitudinal dataset (2010–15) from multiple sources. Findings support our hypothesis. Employees in departments that more evenly fund their programmes report lower levels of intrinsic motivation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070711071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070711071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/padm.12618

DO - 10.1111/padm.12618

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85070711071

JO - Public Administration

JF - Public Administration

SN - 0033-3298

ER -