It is important for both academics and practitioners to understand how biases influence auditing opinions, as well as how we might counteract those biases. According to moral seduction theory, auditors' judgments are morally induced by conflicts of interest in an unconscious manner. We combined an auditor ethical decision-making model with an expertise model in a laboratory experiment with European auditors to demonstrate that expertise helps to mitigate unconscious reporting bias in the going-concern setting. Our findings suggest that while problem-solving ability reinforces the auditors' public watchdog function, task-specific experience reduces their fear of provoking the self-fulfilling prophecy effect. Our contribution to the literature is timely since the European Green Paper on Auditing is ignoring auditor education, learning, and training as potentially effective ways to enhance audit quality and increase professional skepticism.
|Number of pages||13|
|Journal||Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation|
|Publication status||Published - 2015 Mar 1|
Bibliographical noteFunding Information:
This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government ( NRF-2012-S1A3A2-2012S1A3A2033412 ). We acknowledge financial contribution from the Spanish Ministry of Innovation and Science (research projects SEJ2004-00791ECON , SEJ2007-62215/ECON/FEDER , SEJ 2006-14021 , ECO2010-17463 ECON-FEDER ).
© 2015 Elsevier Inc.
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes