Central corneal thickness measurements in unoperated eyes and eyes after PRK for myopia using Pentacam, Orbscan II, and ultrasonic pachymetry

Woong Kim Sun, Jue Byun Yeo, Eungkweon Kim, Tae-im Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare central corneal thickness measurements obtained in unoperated eyes and eyes after myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) using a rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam), a scanning slit corneal topography system (Orbscan II), and ultrasonic pachymetry. METHODS: Corneal thickness was measured using Pentacam, Orbscan II, and ultrasonic pachymetry in 25 unoperated eyes (unoperated group), 24 eyes 1 to 3 months after myopic PRK (early postoperative PRK group), and 21 eyes 4 months or more after myopic PRK (late postoperative PRK group). RESULTS: In the unoperated group, corneal thickness measurements were similar for all three methods (P=.125). In the early postoperative PRK group, Orbscan measurements were thinner than Pentacam and ultrasonic measurements by a mean of 69.4 μm and 63.4 μm (P<.001 and P=.002, respectively). In the late postoperative PRK group, Orbscan measurements were thinner than Pentacam measurements by a mean of 36.0 μm (P=.017). Pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry measurements were similar for all three groups with a mean difference of approximately 10 μm. CONCLUSIONS: Following myopic PRK, Pentacam was comparable to ultrasonic pachymetry in measuring corneal thickness, whereas Orbscan measurements were thinner.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)888-894
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Refractive Surgery
Volume23
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - 2007 Nov 1

Fingerprint

Corneal Pachymetry
Photorefractive Keratectomy
Myopia
Ultrasonics
Corneal Topography

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

@article{d13668ab0d7943188eb49530e15f085d,
title = "Central corneal thickness measurements in unoperated eyes and eyes after PRK for myopia using Pentacam, Orbscan II, and ultrasonic pachymetry",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To compare central corneal thickness measurements obtained in unoperated eyes and eyes after myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) using a rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam), a scanning slit corneal topography system (Orbscan II), and ultrasonic pachymetry. METHODS: Corneal thickness was measured using Pentacam, Orbscan II, and ultrasonic pachymetry in 25 unoperated eyes (unoperated group), 24 eyes 1 to 3 months after myopic PRK (early postoperative PRK group), and 21 eyes 4 months or more after myopic PRK (late postoperative PRK group). RESULTS: In the unoperated group, corneal thickness measurements were similar for all three methods (P=.125). In the early postoperative PRK group, Orbscan measurements were thinner than Pentacam and ultrasonic measurements by a mean of 69.4 μm and 63.4 μm (P<.001 and P=.002, respectively). In the late postoperative PRK group, Orbscan measurements were thinner than Pentacam measurements by a mean of 36.0 μm (P=.017). Pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry measurements were similar for all three groups with a mean difference of approximately 10 μm. CONCLUSIONS: Following myopic PRK, Pentacam was comparable to ultrasonic pachymetry in measuring corneal thickness, whereas Orbscan measurements were thinner.",
author = "Sun, {Woong Kim} and Yeo, {Jue Byun} and Eungkweon Kim and Tae-im Kim",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "888--894",
journal = "Journal of Refractive Surgery",
issn = "1081-597X",
publisher = "Slack Incorporated",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Central corneal thickness measurements in unoperated eyes and eyes after PRK for myopia using Pentacam, Orbscan II, and ultrasonic pachymetry

AU - Sun, Woong Kim

AU - Yeo, Jue Byun

AU - Kim, Eungkweon

AU - Kim, Tae-im

PY - 2007/11/1

Y1 - 2007/11/1

N2 - PURPOSE: To compare central corneal thickness measurements obtained in unoperated eyes and eyes after myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) using a rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam), a scanning slit corneal topography system (Orbscan II), and ultrasonic pachymetry. METHODS: Corneal thickness was measured using Pentacam, Orbscan II, and ultrasonic pachymetry in 25 unoperated eyes (unoperated group), 24 eyes 1 to 3 months after myopic PRK (early postoperative PRK group), and 21 eyes 4 months or more after myopic PRK (late postoperative PRK group). RESULTS: In the unoperated group, corneal thickness measurements were similar for all three methods (P=.125). In the early postoperative PRK group, Orbscan measurements were thinner than Pentacam and ultrasonic measurements by a mean of 69.4 μm and 63.4 μm (P<.001 and P=.002, respectively). In the late postoperative PRK group, Orbscan measurements were thinner than Pentacam measurements by a mean of 36.0 μm (P=.017). Pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry measurements were similar for all three groups with a mean difference of approximately 10 μm. CONCLUSIONS: Following myopic PRK, Pentacam was comparable to ultrasonic pachymetry in measuring corneal thickness, whereas Orbscan measurements were thinner.

AB - PURPOSE: To compare central corneal thickness measurements obtained in unoperated eyes and eyes after myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) using a rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam), a scanning slit corneal topography system (Orbscan II), and ultrasonic pachymetry. METHODS: Corneal thickness was measured using Pentacam, Orbscan II, and ultrasonic pachymetry in 25 unoperated eyes (unoperated group), 24 eyes 1 to 3 months after myopic PRK (early postoperative PRK group), and 21 eyes 4 months or more after myopic PRK (late postoperative PRK group). RESULTS: In the unoperated group, corneal thickness measurements were similar for all three methods (P=.125). In the early postoperative PRK group, Orbscan measurements were thinner than Pentacam and ultrasonic measurements by a mean of 69.4 μm and 63.4 μm (P<.001 and P=.002, respectively). In the late postoperative PRK group, Orbscan measurements were thinner than Pentacam measurements by a mean of 36.0 μm (P=.017). Pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry measurements were similar for all three groups with a mean difference of approximately 10 μm. CONCLUSIONS: Following myopic PRK, Pentacam was comparable to ultrasonic pachymetry in measuring corneal thickness, whereas Orbscan measurements were thinner.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36448970833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36448970833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 18041241

AN - SCOPUS:36448970833

VL - 23

SP - 888

EP - 894

JO - Journal of Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Refractive Surgery

SN - 1081-597X

IS - 9

ER -