TY - JOUR
T1 - Characteristics of patients presented with metastases during or after completion of chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer
T2 - A case series
AU - Torky, Radwan
AU - Alessa, Mohammed
AU - Kim, Ho Seung
AU - Sakr, Ahmed
AU - Zakarneh, Eman
AU - Sauri, Fozan
AU - Bae, Heejin
AU - Kim, Nam Kyu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Korean Society of Coloproctology.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Purpose: Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is managed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT), followed by surgery. Herein we reported patients with metastases during or after CRT. Methods: Data of patients with LARC who received CRT from 2008 to 2017 were reviewed. Patients with metastases after CRT were included. Those with metastatic tumors at the initial diagnosis were excluded. Results: Fourteen patients (1.3%) of 1,092 who received CRT presented with metastases. Magnetic resonance circumferential resection margin (mrCRM) and mesorectal lymph nodes (LNs) were positive in 12 patients (85.7%). Meanwhile, magnetic resonance extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI) was positive in 10 patients (71.4%). Magnetic resonance tumor regression grade (mrTRG) 4 and mrTRG5 was detected in 5 and 1 patient respectively. Ten patients (71.4%) underwent combined surgery and 3 (21.4%) received palliative chemotherapy. Conclusion: Patients with metastases after CRT showed a higher rate of positive mrCRM, mrEMVI, mesorectal LNs, and poor tumor response. Further studies with a large number of patients are necessary for better survival outcomes in LARC.
AB - Purpose: Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is managed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT), followed by surgery. Herein we reported patients with metastases during or after CRT. Methods: Data of patients with LARC who received CRT from 2008 to 2017 were reviewed. Patients with metastases after CRT were included. Those with metastatic tumors at the initial diagnosis were excluded. Results: Fourteen patients (1.3%) of 1,092 who received CRT presented with metastases. Magnetic resonance circumferential resection margin (mrCRM) and mesorectal lymph nodes (LNs) were positive in 12 patients (85.7%). Meanwhile, magnetic resonance extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI) was positive in 10 patients (71.4%). Magnetic resonance tumor regression grade (mrTRG) 4 and mrTRG5 was detected in 5 and 1 patient respectively. Ten patients (71.4%) underwent combined surgery and 3 (21.4%) received palliative chemotherapy. Conclusion: Patients with metastases after CRT showed a higher rate of positive mrCRM, mrEMVI, mesorectal LNs, and poor tumor response. Further studies with a large number of patients are necessary for better survival outcomes in LARC.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110263377&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85110263377&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3393/AC.2020.08.10.1
DO - 10.3393/AC.2020.08.10.1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85110263377
SN - 2287-9714
VL - 37
SP - 186
EP - 191
JO - Annals of Coloproctology
JF - Annals of Coloproctology
IS - 3
ER -