Characterization of microcalcification: Can digital monitor zooming replace magnification mammography in full-field digital mammography?

minjung Kim, Eunkyung Kim, jinyoung kwak, Eun Ju Son, Ji Hyun Youk, Seon Hyeong Choi, Mooyoung Han, Ki Keun Oh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy and image quality of microcalcifications in zoomed digital contact mammography with digital magnification mammography. Three radiologists with different levels of experience in mammography reviewed 120 microcalcification clusters in 111 patients with a full-field digital mammography system relying on digital magnification mammogram (MAG) images and zoomed images from contact mammography (ZOOM) using commercially available zooming systems on monitors. Each radiologist estimated the probability of malignancy and rated the image quality and confidence rate. Performance was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. All three radiologists rated MAG images higher than ZOOM images for sensitivity with statistical significance (average value, 92% vs. 87%, P < 0.05) and performance by ROC analysis improved with MAG imaging. The confidence rate for diagnosis decision and the assessment of lesion characteristics were also better in MAG images than in ZOOM images with statistical significance (P < 0.0001). Digital magnification mammography can enhance diagnostic performance when characterizing microcalcifications. Images zoomed from digital contact mammography cannot serve as an alternative to direct magnification digital mammography.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)310-317
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Radiology
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Calcinosis
Mammography
ROC Curve
Sensitivity and Specificity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{cc287fca2f274837a3fb7fdabb278bcf,
title = "Characterization of microcalcification: Can digital monitor zooming replace magnification mammography in full-field digital mammography?",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy and image quality of microcalcifications in zoomed digital contact mammography with digital magnification mammography. Three radiologists with different levels of experience in mammography reviewed 120 microcalcification clusters in 111 patients with a full-field digital mammography system relying on digital magnification mammogram (MAG) images and zoomed images from contact mammography (ZOOM) using commercially available zooming systems on monitors. Each radiologist estimated the probability of malignancy and rated the image quality and confidence rate. Performance was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. All three radiologists rated MAG images higher than ZOOM images for sensitivity with statistical significance (average value, 92{\%} vs. 87{\%}, P < 0.05) and performance by ROC analysis improved with MAG imaging. The confidence rate for diagnosis decision and the assessment of lesion characteristics were also better in MAG images than in ZOOM images with statistical significance (P < 0.0001). Digital magnification mammography can enhance diagnostic performance when characterizing microcalcifications. Images zoomed from digital contact mammography cannot serve as an alternative to direct magnification digital mammography.",
author = "minjung Kim and Eunkyung Kim and jinyoung kwak and Son, {Eun Ju} and Youk, {Ji Hyun} and Choi, {Seon Hyeong} and Mooyoung Han and Oh, {Ki Keun}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00330-008-1135-2",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "310--317",
journal = "European Radiology",
issn = "0938-7994",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

Characterization of microcalcification : Can digital monitor zooming replace magnification mammography in full-field digital mammography? / Kim, minjung; Kim, Eunkyung; kwak, jinyoung; Son, Eun Ju; Youk, Ji Hyun; Choi, Seon Hyeong; Han, Mooyoung; Oh, Ki Keun.

In: European Radiology, Vol. 19, No. 2, 01.01.2009, p. 310-317.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Characterization of microcalcification

T2 - Can digital monitor zooming replace magnification mammography in full-field digital mammography?

AU - Kim, minjung

AU - Kim, Eunkyung

AU - kwak, jinyoung

AU - Son, Eun Ju

AU - Youk, Ji Hyun

AU - Choi, Seon Hyeong

AU - Han, Mooyoung

AU - Oh, Ki Keun

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy and image quality of microcalcifications in zoomed digital contact mammography with digital magnification mammography. Three radiologists with different levels of experience in mammography reviewed 120 microcalcification clusters in 111 patients with a full-field digital mammography system relying on digital magnification mammogram (MAG) images and zoomed images from contact mammography (ZOOM) using commercially available zooming systems on monitors. Each radiologist estimated the probability of malignancy and rated the image quality and confidence rate. Performance was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. All three radiologists rated MAG images higher than ZOOM images for sensitivity with statistical significance (average value, 92% vs. 87%, P < 0.05) and performance by ROC analysis improved with MAG imaging. The confidence rate for diagnosis decision and the assessment of lesion characteristics were also better in MAG images than in ZOOM images with statistical significance (P < 0.0001). Digital magnification mammography can enhance diagnostic performance when characterizing microcalcifications. Images zoomed from digital contact mammography cannot serve as an alternative to direct magnification digital mammography.

AB - The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy and image quality of microcalcifications in zoomed digital contact mammography with digital magnification mammography. Three radiologists with different levels of experience in mammography reviewed 120 microcalcification clusters in 111 patients with a full-field digital mammography system relying on digital magnification mammogram (MAG) images and zoomed images from contact mammography (ZOOM) using commercially available zooming systems on monitors. Each radiologist estimated the probability of malignancy and rated the image quality and confidence rate. Performance was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. All three radiologists rated MAG images higher than ZOOM images for sensitivity with statistical significance (average value, 92% vs. 87%, P < 0.05) and performance by ROC analysis improved with MAG imaging. The confidence rate for diagnosis decision and the assessment of lesion characteristics were also better in MAG images than in ZOOM images with statistical significance (P < 0.0001). Digital magnification mammography can enhance diagnostic performance when characterizing microcalcifications. Images zoomed from digital contact mammography cannot serve as an alternative to direct magnification digital mammography.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=59249084566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=59249084566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00330-008-1135-2

DO - 10.1007/s00330-008-1135-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 18677486

AN - SCOPUS:59249084566

VL - 19

SP - 310

EP - 317

JO - European Radiology

JF - European Radiology

SN - 0938-7994

IS - 2

ER -