Aerosol size distributions and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) number concentrations were measured in spring 2017 over the Yellow Sea on board the research vessel Gisang 1. The average number concentration of particles larger than 10 nm and CCN at 0.65% supersaturation (S) were 7622 ± 4038 cm−3 and 4821 ± 1763 cm−3, respectively. Characteristics of aerosol size distribution data were analyzed using a positive matrix factorization (PMF) method. It was found that only 6 Factors could explain the aerosol size distribution reasonably well. Factors 1 and 2 indicated nucleation mode particles, Factor 3 indicated Aitken mode particles, and Factors 4, 5, and 6 indicated accumulation mode particles. The concentrations of nucleation and Aitken mode particles showed a clear wind direction dependence; high under westerly winds due to the high concentrations of particles and precursor gases in eastern China. Meanwhile, the concentration of larger particles and CCN showed no significant wind direction dependence. Aerosol size distribution was also significantly influenced by meteorology. Small particles were predominant during clear days. In contrast during mist or fog days, the aerosol size distribution shifted to larger sizes. A CCN closure experiment was conducted using results of the PMF analysis. The assumption of internally mixed particles led to overestimation of predicted CCN concentrations but agreement was significantly better when externally mixed particles were considered. The logarithmic curve fit of NCCN(S) = 4825 ∗ log S + 4933 was found to very well explain measured CCN concentrations at a few S over the Yellow Sea, and therefore is recommended as input CCN spectral data for numerical models that explicitly treat CCN activation.
Bibliographical noteFunding Information:
This work was supported by the Korea Meteorological Administration Research and Development Program under Grant KMIPA2015-1030 and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. NRF-2018R1A2B2006965 ). The authors are grateful to the National Institute of Meteorological Sciences for the support of the Gisang 1 research vessel and its crew members. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the NOAA Air Resources Laboratory (ARL) for the provision of the HYSPLIT transport and dispersion model and READY website ( http://www.ready.noaa.gov ) used in this publication.
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Atmospheric Science