Clinical outcomes of SMILE with a triple centration technique and corneal wavefront- guided transepithelial PRK in high astigmatism

Ikhyun Jun, David Sung Yong Kang, Dan Z. Reinstein, Samuel Arba-Mosquera, Timothy J. Archer, KyoungYul Seo, Tae-im Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To comparatively investigate the clinical outcomes, vector parameters, and corneal aberrations of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) with a triple centration technique and corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for the correction of high astigmatism. METHODS: This retrospective, comparative case series study included 89 eyes (89 patients) that received treatment for myopia with high astigmatism (≥ 2.50 diopters) using SMILE with a triple centration technique (SMILE group; 45 eyes) and corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK (transepithelial PRK group; 44 eyes). Visual acuity measurement, manifest refraction, slit-lamp examination, autokeratometry, corneal topography, and evaluation of corneal wavefront aberration were performed preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. The safety, efficacy, vector parameters, and corneal aberrations at 6 months after surgery were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: At 6 months after surgery, the transepithelial PRK and SMILE groups exhibited comparable mean uncorrected distance visual acuities (-0.06 ± 0.07 and -0.05 ± 0.07 logMAR, respectively), safety, efficacy, and predictability of refractive and visual outcomes. There was a slight but statistically significant difference in the correction index between the transepithelial PRK and SMILE groups (0.96 ± 0.11 and 0.91 ± 0.10, respectively). Whereas the transepithelial PRK group exhibited increased corneal spherical aberration and significantly reduced corneal coma and trefoil, no changes in aberrometric values were noted in the SMILE group. CONCLUSIONS: Both SMILE with a triple centration technique and corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK are effective and provide predictable outcomes for the correction of high myopic astigmatism, although slight undercorrection was observed in the SMILE group. The triple centration technique was helpful in astigmatism correction by SMILE.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)156-163
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Refractive Surgery
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Mar 1

Fingerprint

Photorefractive Keratectomy
Astigmatism
Corneal Wavefront Aberration
Visual Acuity
Corneal Topography
Safety
Myopia
Coma

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Jun, Ikhyun ; Kang, David Sung Yong ; Reinstein, Dan Z. ; Arba-Mosquera, Samuel ; Archer, Timothy J. ; Seo, KyoungYul ; Kim, Tae-im. / Clinical outcomes of SMILE with a triple centration technique and corneal wavefront- guided transepithelial PRK in high astigmatism. In: Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2018 ; Vol. 34, No. 3. pp. 156-163.
@article{8ee4dee938f3485c85d9b39dae45ae0b,
title = "Clinical outcomes of SMILE with a triple centration technique and corneal wavefront- guided transepithelial PRK in high astigmatism",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To comparatively investigate the clinical outcomes, vector parameters, and corneal aberrations of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) with a triple centration technique and corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for the correction of high astigmatism. METHODS: This retrospective, comparative case series study included 89 eyes (89 patients) that received treatment for myopia with high astigmatism (≥ 2.50 diopters) using SMILE with a triple centration technique (SMILE group; 45 eyes) and corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK (transepithelial PRK group; 44 eyes). Visual acuity measurement, manifest refraction, slit-lamp examination, autokeratometry, corneal topography, and evaluation of corneal wavefront aberration were performed preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. The safety, efficacy, vector parameters, and corneal aberrations at 6 months after surgery were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: At 6 months after surgery, the transepithelial PRK and SMILE groups exhibited comparable mean uncorrected distance visual acuities (-0.06 ± 0.07 and -0.05 ± 0.07 logMAR, respectively), safety, efficacy, and predictability of refractive and visual outcomes. There was a slight but statistically significant difference in the correction index between the transepithelial PRK and SMILE groups (0.96 ± 0.11 and 0.91 ± 0.10, respectively). Whereas the transepithelial PRK group exhibited increased corneal spherical aberration and significantly reduced corneal coma and trefoil, no changes in aberrometric values were noted in the SMILE group. CONCLUSIONS: Both SMILE with a triple centration technique and corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK are effective and provide predictable outcomes for the correction of high myopic astigmatism, although slight undercorrection was observed in the SMILE group. The triple centration technique was helpful in astigmatism correction by SMILE.",
author = "Ikhyun Jun and Kang, {David Sung Yong} and Reinstein, {Dan Z.} and Samuel Arba-Mosquera and Archer, {Timothy J.} and KyoungYul Seo and Tae-im Kim",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3928/1081597X-20180104-03",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "156--163",
journal = "Journal of Refractive Surgery",
issn = "1081-597X",
publisher = "Slack Incorporated",
number = "3",

}

Clinical outcomes of SMILE with a triple centration technique and corneal wavefront- guided transepithelial PRK in high astigmatism. / Jun, Ikhyun; Kang, David Sung Yong; Reinstein, Dan Z.; Arba-Mosquera, Samuel; Archer, Timothy J.; Seo, KyoungYul; Kim, Tae-im.

In: Journal of Refractive Surgery, Vol. 34, No. 3, 01.03.2018, p. 156-163.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical outcomes of SMILE with a triple centration technique and corneal wavefront- guided transepithelial PRK in high astigmatism

AU - Jun, Ikhyun

AU - Kang, David Sung Yong

AU - Reinstein, Dan Z.

AU - Arba-Mosquera, Samuel

AU - Archer, Timothy J.

AU - Seo, KyoungYul

AU - Kim, Tae-im

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - PURPOSE: To comparatively investigate the clinical outcomes, vector parameters, and corneal aberrations of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) with a triple centration technique and corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for the correction of high astigmatism. METHODS: This retrospective, comparative case series study included 89 eyes (89 patients) that received treatment for myopia with high astigmatism (≥ 2.50 diopters) using SMILE with a triple centration technique (SMILE group; 45 eyes) and corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK (transepithelial PRK group; 44 eyes). Visual acuity measurement, manifest refraction, slit-lamp examination, autokeratometry, corneal topography, and evaluation of corneal wavefront aberration were performed preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. The safety, efficacy, vector parameters, and corneal aberrations at 6 months after surgery were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: At 6 months after surgery, the transepithelial PRK and SMILE groups exhibited comparable mean uncorrected distance visual acuities (-0.06 ± 0.07 and -0.05 ± 0.07 logMAR, respectively), safety, efficacy, and predictability of refractive and visual outcomes. There was a slight but statistically significant difference in the correction index between the transepithelial PRK and SMILE groups (0.96 ± 0.11 and 0.91 ± 0.10, respectively). Whereas the transepithelial PRK group exhibited increased corneal spherical aberration and significantly reduced corneal coma and trefoil, no changes in aberrometric values were noted in the SMILE group. CONCLUSIONS: Both SMILE with a triple centration technique and corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK are effective and provide predictable outcomes for the correction of high myopic astigmatism, although slight undercorrection was observed in the SMILE group. The triple centration technique was helpful in astigmatism correction by SMILE.

AB - PURPOSE: To comparatively investigate the clinical outcomes, vector parameters, and corneal aberrations of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) with a triple centration technique and corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for the correction of high astigmatism. METHODS: This retrospective, comparative case series study included 89 eyes (89 patients) that received treatment for myopia with high astigmatism (≥ 2.50 diopters) using SMILE with a triple centration technique (SMILE group; 45 eyes) and corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK (transepithelial PRK group; 44 eyes). Visual acuity measurement, manifest refraction, slit-lamp examination, autokeratometry, corneal topography, and evaluation of corneal wavefront aberration were performed preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. The safety, efficacy, vector parameters, and corneal aberrations at 6 months after surgery were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: At 6 months after surgery, the transepithelial PRK and SMILE groups exhibited comparable mean uncorrected distance visual acuities (-0.06 ± 0.07 and -0.05 ± 0.07 logMAR, respectively), safety, efficacy, and predictability of refractive and visual outcomes. There was a slight but statistically significant difference in the correction index between the transepithelial PRK and SMILE groups (0.96 ± 0.11 and 0.91 ± 0.10, respectively). Whereas the transepithelial PRK group exhibited increased corneal spherical aberration and significantly reduced corneal coma and trefoil, no changes in aberrometric values were noted in the SMILE group. CONCLUSIONS: Both SMILE with a triple centration technique and corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK are effective and provide predictable outcomes for the correction of high myopic astigmatism, although slight undercorrection was observed in the SMILE group. The triple centration technique was helpful in astigmatism correction by SMILE.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044288598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044288598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3928/1081597X-20180104-03

DO - 10.3928/1081597X-20180104-03

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 156

EP - 163

JO - Journal of Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Refractive Surgery

SN - 1081-597X

IS - 3

ER -