Clinical usefulness of cervicogram as a primary screening test for cervical neoplasia

Young Tae Kim, Jae Wook Kim, Sung Hoon Kim, Yu Ri Kim, Jae Hoon Kim, Bo Sung Yoon, Yong Won Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the cervicogram as a primary screening test for cervical neoplasia. A total of 294 women who had undergone a cervicogram and a Pap test between January and July 2003, were selected. The diagnostic accuracy of the Pap test, cervicogram, and the Pap test combined with a cervicogram were compared with the histopathologic diagnosis. Among 294 women, the Pap test was negative in 130 cases and positive in 164 cases. Among patients with positive Pap test, cervicogram were negative in 101 cases (61.6%) and positive in 63 cases (38.4%). The diagnostic accuracy between cervicogram with positive Pap test and histology was as follows; sensitivity 44.9%, specificity 78.3%, positive predictive value 84.1%, negative predictive value 32.7%, false positive rate 15.9%, and false negative rate 67.3%. Although the adjunctive use of cervicogram with the Pap test in the initial screening of cervical neoplasia showed a higher specificity and higher positive predictive value compared to the Pap test alone, consideration in terms of lower sensitivity, lower positive predictive value, higher false positive rate and cost-effectiveness should be given in lieu of clinically applying cervicogram with the pap test as an initial screening test.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)213-220
Number of pages8
JournalYonsei medical journal
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005 Apr 30

Fingerprint

Papanicolaou Test
Neoplasms
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Histology
Sensitivity and Specificity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Kim, Young Tae ; Kim, Jae Wook ; Kim, Sung Hoon ; Kim, Yu Ri ; Kim, Jae Hoon ; Yoon, Bo Sung ; Park, Yong Won. / Clinical usefulness of cervicogram as a primary screening test for cervical neoplasia. In: Yonsei medical journal. 2005 ; Vol. 46, No. 2. pp. 213-220.
@article{497582c13b774e258a8fe29e925c909e,
title = "Clinical usefulness of cervicogram as a primary screening test for cervical neoplasia",
abstract = "The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the cervicogram as a primary screening test for cervical neoplasia. A total of 294 women who had undergone a cervicogram and a Pap test between January and July 2003, were selected. The diagnostic accuracy of the Pap test, cervicogram, and the Pap test combined with a cervicogram were compared with the histopathologic diagnosis. Among 294 women, the Pap test was negative in 130 cases and positive in 164 cases. Among patients with positive Pap test, cervicogram were negative in 101 cases (61.6{\%}) and positive in 63 cases (38.4{\%}). The diagnostic accuracy between cervicogram with positive Pap test and histology was as follows; sensitivity 44.9{\%}, specificity 78.3{\%}, positive predictive value 84.1{\%}, negative predictive value 32.7{\%}, false positive rate 15.9{\%}, and false negative rate 67.3{\%}. Although the adjunctive use of cervicogram with the Pap test in the initial screening of cervical neoplasia showed a higher specificity and higher positive predictive value compared to the Pap test alone, consideration in terms of lower sensitivity, lower positive predictive value, higher false positive rate and cost-effectiveness should be given in lieu of clinically applying cervicogram with the pap test as an initial screening test.",
author = "Kim, {Young Tae} and Kim, {Jae Wook} and Kim, {Sung Hoon} and Kim, {Yu Ri} and Kim, {Jae Hoon} and Yoon, {Bo Sung} and Park, {Yong Won}",
year = "2005",
month = "4",
day = "30",
doi = "10.3349/ymj.2005.46.2.213",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "213--220",
journal = "Yonsei Medical Journal",
issn = "0513-5796",
publisher = "Yonsei University College of Medicine",
number = "2",

}

Clinical usefulness of cervicogram as a primary screening test for cervical neoplasia. / Kim, Young Tae; Kim, Jae Wook; Kim, Sung Hoon; Kim, Yu Ri; Kim, Jae Hoon; Yoon, Bo Sung; Park, Yong Won.

In: Yonsei medical journal, Vol. 46, No. 2, 30.04.2005, p. 213-220.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical usefulness of cervicogram as a primary screening test for cervical neoplasia

AU - Kim, Young Tae

AU - Kim, Jae Wook

AU - Kim, Sung Hoon

AU - Kim, Yu Ri

AU - Kim, Jae Hoon

AU - Yoon, Bo Sung

AU - Park, Yong Won

PY - 2005/4/30

Y1 - 2005/4/30

N2 - The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the cervicogram as a primary screening test for cervical neoplasia. A total of 294 women who had undergone a cervicogram and a Pap test between January and July 2003, were selected. The diagnostic accuracy of the Pap test, cervicogram, and the Pap test combined with a cervicogram were compared with the histopathologic diagnosis. Among 294 women, the Pap test was negative in 130 cases and positive in 164 cases. Among patients with positive Pap test, cervicogram were negative in 101 cases (61.6%) and positive in 63 cases (38.4%). The diagnostic accuracy between cervicogram with positive Pap test and histology was as follows; sensitivity 44.9%, specificity 78.3%, positive predictive value 84.1%, negative predictive value 32.7%, false positive rate 15.9%, and false negative rate 67.3%. Although the adjunctive use of cervicogram with the Pap test in the initial screening of cervical neoplasia showed a higher specificity and higher positive predictive value compared to the Pap test alone, consideration in terms of lower sensitivity, lower positive predictive value, higher false positive rate and cost-effectiveness should be given in lieu of clinically applying cervicogram with the pap test as an initial screening test.

AB - The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the cervicogram as a primary screening test for cervical neoplasia. A total of 294 women who had undergone a cervicogram and a Pap test between January and July 2003, were selected. The diagnostic accuracy of the Pap test, cervicogram, and the Pap test combined with a cervicogram were compared with the histopathologic diagnosis. Among 294 women, the Pap test was negative in 130 cases and positive in 164 cases. Among patients with positive Pap test, cervicogram were negative in 101 cases (61.6%) and positive in 63 cases (38.4%). The diagnostic accuracy between cervicogram with positive Pap test and histology was as follows; sensitivity 44.9%, specificity 78.3%, positive predictive value 84.1%, negative predictive value 32.7%, false positive rate 15.9%, and false negative rate 67.3%. Although the adjunctive use of cervicogram with the Pap test in the initial screening of cervical neoplasia showed a higher specificity and higher positive predictive value compared to the Pap test alone, consideration in terms of lower sensitivity, lower positive predictive value, higher false positive rate and cost-effectiveness should be given in lieu of clinically applying cervicogram with the pap test as an initial screening test.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18644368437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18644368437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3349/ymj.2005.46.2.213

DO - 10.3349/ymj.2005.46.2.213

M3 - Article

C2 - 15861493

AN - SCOPUS:18644368437

VL - 46

SP - 213

EP - 220

JO - Yonsei Medical Journal

JF - Yonsei Medical Journal

SN - 0513-5796

IS - 2

ER -